An action research study on the needs and perspectives of medical students and junior residents on peer physical examination guidelines to respect medical students' autonomy and privacy in Japan.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Emily Suzuki, Nobutoshi Nawa, Eriko Okada, Yu Akaishi, Ayako Kashimada, Mitsuyuki Numasawa, Kumiko Yamaguchi, Kazuki Takada, Masanaga Yamawaki
{"title":"An action research study on the needs and perspectives of medical students and junior residents on peer physical examination guidelines to respect medical students' autonomy and privacy in Japan.","authors":"Emily Suzuki, Nobutoshi Nawa, Eriko Okada, Yu Akaishi, Ayako Kashimada, Mitsuyuki Numasawa, Kumiko Yamaguchi, Kazuki Takada, Masanaga Yamawaki","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06649-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study is to develop and refine PPE guidelines that address students' needs and concerns for the Peer Physical Examination (PPE) guidelines and to assess the feasibility of a Japanese version of such guidelines for managing PPE classes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An action research approach was employed. Firstly, we sent a Questionnaire Survey 1 to the 5th and 6th year undergraduate medical students and junior residents to gather participants' expectations and suggested improvements for PPEs and their opinion about having a set of PPE guidelines. We drafted a set of PPE guidelines with reference to PPE policies overseas by reflecting participants' needs as identified through Questionnaire Survey 1. We then conducted interviews of 16 participants and revised our guidelines accordingly. Finally, we asked 632 medical students and 191 junior residents to fill out the form for obtaining informed consent (Questionnaire Survey 2) in order to check the feasibility of our PPE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The majority of the participants supported the development of the PPE guidelines. The interviews identified 5 themes relating to participants' needs and concerns. In a pilot survey, students' refusal rate for being a model patient varied depending on body region and 74.2% had a desire to be informed of any abnormal findings confidentially. Additionally, the need to take a balance between respecting students' autonomy and securing model patients was noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Medical students and junior residents generally supported the PPE guidelines. The right to refuse the model patient role and management of incidental findings should be included in the guidelines. In addition, informing students of educational benefits in being a model patient may be necessary to address the shortage of model patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06649-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to develop and refine PPE guidelines that address students' needs and concerns for the Peer Physical Examination (PPE) guidelines and to assess the feasibility of a Japanese version of such guidelines for managing PPE classes.

Method: An action research approach was employed. Firstly, we sent a Questionnaire Survey 1 to the 5th and 6th year undergraduate medical students and junior residents to gather participants' expectations and suggested improvements for PPEs and their opinion about having a set of PPE guidelines. We drafted a set of PPE guidelines with reference to PPE policies overseas by reflecting participants' needs as identified through Questionnaire Survey 1. We then conducted interviews of 16 participants and revised our guidelines accordingly. Finally, we asked 632 medical students and 191 junior residents to fill out the form for obtaining informed consent (Questionnaire Survey 2) in order to check the feasibility of our PPE guidelines.

Result: The majority of the participants supported the development of the PPE guidelines. The interviews identified 5 themes relating to participants' needs and concerns. In a pilot survey, students' refusal rate for being a model patient varied depending on body region and 74.2% had a desire to be informed of any abnormal findings confidentially. Additionally, the need to take a balance between respecting students' autonomy and securing model patients was noted.

Conclusion: Medical students and junior residents generally supported the PPE guidelines. The right to refuse the model patient role and management of incidental findings should be included in the guidelines. In addition, informing students of educational benefits in being a model patient may be necessary to address the shortage of model patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信