Evaluating the Protective Effects of a Dispersive Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device Versus Balanced Salt Solution on the Cornea During Cataract Surgery.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Justin Hanson, Roxana Khorrami, Kellie Kanamoto, Jason Strawbridge, Kevin M Miller, Shawn R Lin
{"title":"Evaluating the Protective Effects of a Dispersive Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device Versus Balanced Salt Solution on the Cornea During Cataract Surgery.","authors":"Justin Hanson, Roxana Khorrami, Kellie Kanamoto, Jason Strawbridge, Kevin M Miller, Shawn R Lin","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare intraoperative and postoperative effects of applying a viscosurgical device versus balanced salt solution (BSS) during cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective case-control pilot study. Reviewed 27 patients who received Viscoat (Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Fort Worth, TX) or BSS on the cornea during uncomplicated cataract surgery. Surgeries were analyzed for time when the microscope light reflection was indistinct on the cornea while instruments were in the eye. Postoperative data included patient pain ratings, National Eye Institute score, and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with BSS, Viscoat application resulted in a significant increase in time with a clear light reflex during surgery (P<0.001). With BSS, average time without a clear light reflex while instruments were in the eye was 82.69±50.14 sec, or 17.56%±12.00% of the surgery, compared with 0% with Viscoat. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain and National Eye Institute score between groups. However, OSDI score two about grittiness was significantly lower with Viscoat application (P=0.01) and approaching significance for OSDI score three, about painful or sore eyes (P=0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Viscoat provided greater optical clarity during surgery with a single application and was associated with less sensation of grittiness compared with BSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":50457,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare intraoperative and postoperative effects of applying a viscosurgical device versus balanced salt solution (BSS) during cataract surgery.

Methods: Single-center retrospective case-control pilot study. Reviewed 27 patients who received Viscoat (Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Fort Worth, TX) or BSS on the cornea during uncomplicated cataract surgery. Surgeries were analyzed for time when the microscope light reflection was indistinct on the cornea while instruments were in the eye. Postoperative data included patient pain ratings, National Eye Institute score, and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores.

Results: Compared with BSS, Viscoat application resulted in a significant increase in time with a clear light reflex during surgery (P<0.001). With BSS, average time without a clear light reflex while instruments were in the eye was 82.69±50.14 sec, or 17.56%±12.00% of the surgery, compared with 0% with Viscoat. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain and National Eye Institute score between groups. However, OSDI score two about grittiness was significantly lower with Viscoat application (P=0.01) and approaching significance for OSDI score three, about painful or sore eyes (P=0.09).

Conclusions: Viscoat provided greater optical clarity during surgery with a single application and was associated with less sensation of grittiness compared with BSS.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye & Contact Lens: Science and Clinical Practice is the official journal of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO), an international educational association for anterior segment research and clinical practice of interest to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and other vision care providers and researchers. Focusing especially on contact lenses, it also covers dry eye disease, MGD, infections, toxicity of drops and contact lens care solutions, topography, cornea surgery and post-operative care, optics, refractive surgery and corneal stability (eg, UV cross-linking). Peer-reviewed and published six times annually, it is a highly respected scientific journal in its field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信