Cognitive Risk Stratification Score in Middle-aged and Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: a Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Jinghua Zhang, Wilson Wai San Tam, Jinhua Lu, Junjie Chen, Joji Kusuyama, Yanhong Dong, Xin Yi Yap, Wentao Zhou, Na Wang, Hui Nan Yeo, Frena Jia Sy Lee, Vivien Xi Wu
{"title":"Cognitive Risk Stratification Score in Middle-aged and Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: a Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Jinghua Zhang, Wilson Wai San Tam, Jinhua Lu, Junjie Chen, Joji Kusuyama, Yanhong Dong, Xin Yi Yap, Wentao Zhou, Na Wang, Hui Nan Yeo, Frena Jia Sy Lee, Vivien Xi Wu","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Cognitive impairment (CI) affects approximately 45% of middle-aged and older adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) globally. Although formal comprehensive neuropsychological tests are the gold standard for diagnosing CI, they are often time-intensive and may not be feasible in primary care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a novel Risk Stratification Score (RSS) to rapidly and comprehensively predict CI risk among middle-aged and older adults with T2DM, offering a streamlined alternative in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2023 to February 2024 in a primary care polyclinic in Singapore's western region. Participants aged between 40 and 85 diagnosed with T2DM (n=150) were included in a convenience sampling. The primary outcome was CI status and assessed using formal neuropsychological tests, which including Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CI was identified in 49.3% of participants (n=74). The RSS, incorporating the MoCA, Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), demonstrated excellent discrimination, achieving an area under the ROC curve of 0.802 (p < 0.001). With an optimal cutoff of 0.3, the model showed a sensitivity of 63.5% and specificity of 86.8%, effectively differentiating high- and low-risk CI groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RSS in clinical practice, exemplified by the Integrated Metabolic Cognitive Risk Stratification Pathway (imCRSP), is a promising tool for rapid CI risk assessment in primary care. Its robust predictive accuracy and ease of use support its application for early intervention in middle-aged and older adults with T2DM. Future studies should validate its use longitudinally and across diverse populations to enhance generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Cognitive impairment (CI) affects approximately 45% of middle-aged and older adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) globally. Although formal comprehensive neuropsychological tests are the gold standard for diagnosing CI, they are often time-intensive and may not be feasible in primary care.

Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a novel Risk Stratification Score (RSS) to rapidly and comprehensively predict CI risk among middle-aged and older adults with T2DM, offering a streamlined alternative in clinical practice.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2023 to February 2024 in a primary care polyclinic in Singapore's western region. Participants aged between 40 and 85 diagnosed with T2DM (n=150) were included in a convenience sampling. The primary outcome was CI status and assessed using formal neuropsychological tests, which including Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

Results: CI was identified in 49.3% of participants (n=74). The RSS, incorporating the MoCA, Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), demonstrated excellent discrimination, achieving an area under the ROC curve of 0.802 (p < 0.001). With an optimal cutoff of 0.3, the model showed a sensitivity of 63.5% and specificity of 86.8%, effectively differentiating high- and low-risk CI groups.

Conclusion: RSS in clinical practice, exemplified by the Integrated Metabolic Cognitive Risk Stratification Pathway (imCRSP), is a promising tool for rapid CI risk assessment in primary care. Its robust predictive accuracy and ease of use support its application for early intervention in middle-aged and older adults with T2DM. Future studies should validate its use longitudinally and across diverse populations to enhance generalizability.

2 型糖尿病中老年人认知风险分层评分:一项横断面研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信