Literature-Guided 6-Gene Signature for the Stratification of High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.4143/crt.2024.1114
Jong Keon Song, Dong Hyeok Lee, Hyery Kim, Sang-Hyun Hwang
{"title":"Literature-Guided 6-Gene Signature for the Stratification of High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia.","authors":"Jong Keon Song, Dong Hyeok Lee, Hyery Kim, Sang-Hyun Hwang","doi":"10.4143/crt.2024.1114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) shows significant heterogeneity in therapeutic responses. We aimed to develop a gene signature for the stratification of high-risk pediatric AML using publicly available AML datasets, with a focus on literature-based prognostic gene sets.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We identified 300 genes from 12 well-validated studies on AML-related gene signatures. Clinical and gene expression data were obtained from three datasets: TCGA-LAML, TARGET-AML, and BeatAML. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-Cox regression analysis was used to perform the initial gene selection and to construct a prognostic model using the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (n=132). The final gene signature was validated with two independent cohorts: BeatAML (n=411) and TARGET-AML (n=187).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a six-gene signature (ETFB, ARL6IP5, PTP4A3, CSK, HS3ST3B1, PLA2G4A), referred to as the literature-based signature 6 (LBS6), that was significantly associated with lower overall survival rates across the TCGA (high-risk [HR], 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.59 to 6.81; p < 0.001), BeatAML (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.96; p=0.001), and TARGET (HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.36 to 3.08; p < 0.001) datasets. The high-LBS6 score group exhibited significantly poorer five-year event-free survival compared to the low-LBS6 score group (HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.38 to 3.15; p < 0.001). After adjusting for key risk factors, including gene mutations (WT1, FLT3, and NPM1), protocol-based risk group, white blood cell count, and age, the LBS6 score was independently associated with worse survival rates in validation cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our literature-driven approach identified a robust gene signature that stratifies AML patients into distinct risk groups. The LBS6 score shows promise in redefining initial risk stratification and identifying high-risk AML patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49094,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1207-1217"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2024.1114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) shows significant heterogeneity in therapeutic responses. We aimed to develop a gene signature for the stratification of high-risk pediatric AML using publicly available AML datasets, with a focus on literature-based prognostic gene sets.

Materials and methods: We identified 300 genes from 12 well-validated studies on AML-related gene signatures. Clinical and gene expression data were obtained from three datasets: TCGA-LAML, TARGET-AML, and BeatAML. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-Cox regression analysis was used to perform the initial gene selection and to construct a prognostic model using the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (n=132). The final gene signature was validated with two independent cohorts: BeatAML (n=411) and TARGET-AML (n=187).

Results: We identified a six-gene signature (ETFB, ARL6IP5, PTP4A3, CSK, HS3ST3B1, PLA2G4A), referred to as the literature-based signature 6 (LBS6), that was significantly associated with lower overall survival rates across the TCGA (high-risk [HR], 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.59 to 6.81; p < 0.001), BeatAML (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.96; p=0.001), and TARGET (HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.36 to 3.08; p < 0.001) datasets. The high-LBS6 score group exhibited significantly poorer five-year event-free survival compared to the low-LBS6 score group (HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.38 to 3.15; p < 0.001). After adjusting for key risk factors, including gene mutations (WT1, FLT3, and NPM1), protocol-based risk group, white blood cell count, and age, the LBS6 score was independently associated with worse survival rates in validation cohorts.

Conclusion: Our literature-driven approach identified a robust gene signature that stratifies AML patients into distinct risk groups. The LBS6 score shows promise in redefining initial risk stratification and identifying high-risk AML patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

文献引导的6基因标记用于高危急性髓性白血病的分层。
目的:急性髓性白血病(AML)在治疗反应上表现出显著的异质性。我们的目标是利用公开可用的AML数据集开发一种用于高危儿童AML分层的基因标记,重点关注基于文献的预后基因集。材料和方法:我们从12个经过验证的aml相关基因签名研究中鉴定了300个基因。临床和基因表达数据来自三个数据集:TCGA-LAML、TARGET-AML和BeatAML。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)-Cox回归分析进行初始基因选择,并使用TCGA数据库构建预后模型(n=132)。最终的基因标记通过两个独立的队列进行验证:BeatAML (n=411)和TARGET-AML (n=187)。结果:我们发现了一个6基因特征(ETFB, ARL6IP5, PTP4A3, CSK, HS3ST3B1, PLA2G4A),被称为基于文献的特征6 (LBS6),它与TCGA总体生存率较低显著相关(HR=4.2, 95% CI: 2.59-6.81)。结论:我们的文献驱动方法发现了一个强大的基因特征,将AML患者分为不同的风险组。LBS6评分在重新定义初始风险分层和识别高风险AML患者方面显示出希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
126
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Research and Treatment is a peer-reviewed open access publication of the Korean Cancer Association. It is published quarterly, one volume per year. Abbreviated title is Cancer Res Treat. It accepts manuscripts relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research. Subjects include carcinogenesis, tumor biology, molecular oncology, cancer genetics, tumor immunology, epidemiology, predictive markers and cancer prevention, pathology, cancer diagnosis, screening and therapies including chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, gene therapy, multimodality treatment and palliative care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信