Contemporary contrast media dosing during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with pre-existing renal impairment.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Devika Aggarwal, Rebecca Young, Milan Seth, Daniel M Wojdyla, Devraj Sukul, Tracy Y Wang, Simon R Dixon, Michael R Rudnick, Shweta Bansal, Carlo Briguori, Hitinder S Gurm
{"title":"Contemporary contrast media dosing during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with pre-existing renal impairment.","authors":"Devika Aggarwal, Rebecca Young, Milan Seth, Daniel M Wojdyla, Devraj Sukul, Tracy Y Wang, Simon R Dixon, Michael R Rudnick, Shweta Bansal, Carlo Briguori, Hitinder S Gurm","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Contrast volume minimization can mitigate acute kidney injury (AKI) risk following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but national data regarding contemporary contrast volume dosing patterns are lacking. The authors analyzed data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI registry to assess the prevalence and outcomes of renal function-based contrast dosing during PCI in patients with pre-existing renal impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors analyzed data from 463 753 patients with an eGFR ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and categorized patients based on contrast volume/eGFR: high (> 3), low (1-3), and ultra-low (less than 1). eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine equation. The primary outcome was occurrence of AKI. Outcomes were adjusted based on covariates derived from a validated AKI prediction model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority (51.4%) of patients received high contrast volume. Compared with patients who received low contrast volume, patients with high contrast volume use had a significantly higher incidence of AKI (adjusted OR 1.36 [1.28 to 1.45]) and a higher stage of AKI (adjusted OR 1.90 [1.80 to 2.00]). The incidence of AKI was similar between low and ultra-low contrast volume use. The development of new need for dialysis was higher in patients who received high contrast volume (2.8%) compared with those who received low contrast volume (0.8%) and ultra-low contrast volume (0.8%) (P less than .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High contrast volume during PCI is associated with worse outcomes including AKI and new need for dialysis. Our study provides further support for the use of contrast volume less than 3 times the eGFR as a target to guide contrast dosing during PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Contrast volume minimization can mitigate acute kidney injury (AKI) risk following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but national data regarding contemporary contrast volume dosing patterns are lacking. The authors analyzed data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI registry to assess the prevalence and outcomes of renal function-based contrast dosing during PCI in patients with pre-existing renal impairment.

Methods: The authors analyzed data from 463 753 patients with an eGFR ≤ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and categorized patients based on contrast volume/eGFR: high (> 3), low (1-3), and ultra-low (less than 1). eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine equation. The primary outcome was occurrence of AKI. Outcomes were adjusted based on covariates derived from a validated AKI prediction model.

Results: The majority (51.4%) of patients received high contrast volume. Compared with patients who received low contrast volume, patients with high contrast volume use had a significantly higher incidence of AKI (adjusted OR 1.36 [1.28 to 1.45]) and a higher stage of AKI (adjusted OR 1.90 [1.80 to 2.00]). The incidence of AKI was similar between low and ultra-low contrast volume use. The development of new need for dialysis was higher in patients who received high contrast volume (2.8%) compared with those who received low contrast volume (0.8%) and ultra-low contrast volume (0.8%) (P less than .001).

Conclusions: High contrast volume during PCI is associated with worse outcomes including AKI and new need for dialysis. Our study provides further support for the use of contrast volume less than 3 times the eGFR as a target to guide contrast dosing during PCI.

已有肾脏损害患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间的当代对比剂剂量。
目的:造影剂体积最小化可以减轻经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后急性肾损伤(AKI)的风险,但缺乏有关当代造影剂剂量模式的国家数据。作者分析了国家心血管数据登记处(NCDR) CathPCI登记处的数据,以评估先前存在肾功能损害的患者在PCI期间基于肾功能的对比剂剂量的流行程度和结果。方法:作者分析了463 753例eGFR≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2的患者的数据,并根据造反差量/eGFR将患者分为高(bb0.3)、低(1-3)和超低(小于1)。eGFR使用慢性肾脏疾病流行病学协作肌酐方程计算。主要终点是AKI的发生。结果根据来自验证AKI预测模型的协变量进行调整。结果:绝大多数(51.4%)患者接受了高造影剂。与使用低造影剂的患者相比,使用高造影剂的患者AKI发生率明显更高(调整OR为1.36 [1.28 ~ 1.45]),AKI分期也更高(调整OR为1.90[1.80 ~ 2.00])。低对比度和超低对比度的AKI发生率相似。与低对比剂组(0.8%)和超低对比剂组(0.8%)相比,高对比剂组(2.8%)患者出现新的透析需求(P < 0.001)。结论:PCI期间高造影剂与包括AKI和新透析需求在内的较差结果相关。我们的研究进一步支持使用造影剂体积小于eGFR的3倍作为PCI期间指导造影剂剂量的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Invasive Cardiology
Journal of Invasive Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
214
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Invasive Cardiology will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the invasive treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信