Marcello Di Martino, Ángela de la Hoz Rodriguez, Andrea Saibanti, Guillermo Salvador Camarmo, Nico Pagano, Elena Martín-Pérez, Matteo Donadon
{"title":"Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreatic resection: a systematic review.","authors":"Marcello Di Martino, Ángela de la Hoz Rodriguez, Andrea Saibanti, Guillermo Salvador Camarmo, Nico Pagano, Elena Martín-Pérez, Matteo Donadon","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02787-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) is a condition defined by a reduction in pancreatic exocrine activity that impairs normal digestion. Despite established guidelines recommendations, precise diagnosis of PEI after pancreatic resection are infrequently achieved. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the methodology and accuracy of diagnostic tools available for evaluating PEI after pancreatic resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of PEI diagnostic tests was conducted using a combined text and MeSH search strategy to identify relevant articles focused on post-pancreatectomy PEI diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search yielded 4,874 records, and 30 studies were included in the analysis, with a total of 2,305 patients. The reported frequency of PEI across the included studies varied widely, though more than two-thirds of included papers reported an incidence of PEI above 65% in patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy. The faecal elastase-1 (FE-1) test was the most frequently used test for diagnosing post-pancreatectomy PEI. Six studies compared the diagnostic accuracy of FE-1 with faecal fat tests or 13 C breath tests, finding no significant differences. Five studies reported on micronutrient deficiencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FE-1 test is the most commonly used diagnostic tool for post-pancreatectomy PEI; however, well-designed studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of various tests for PEI are lacking. Additionally, few studies report on micronutrient deficiencies, variations in anthropometric data or PEI-related patient-reported outcomes. Future studies should aim to establish a gold standard for diagnosis and severity assessment of post-pancreatectomy PEI and provide guidance for tailored pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02787-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) is a condition defined by a reduction in pancreatic exocrine activity that impairs normal digestion. Despite established guidelines recommendations, precise diagnosis of PEI after pancreatic resection are infrequently achieved. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the methodology and accuracy of diagnostic tools available for evaluating PEI after pancreatic resection.
Methods: A review of PEI diagnostic tests was conducted using a combined text and MeSH search strategy to identify relevant articles focused on post-pancreatectomy PEI diagnosis.
Results: The literature search yielded 4,874 records, and 30 studies were included in the analysis, with a total of 2,305 patients. The reported frequency of PEI across the included studies varied widely, though more than two-thirds of included papers reported an incidence of PEI above 65% in patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy. The faecal elastase-1 (FE-1) test was the most frequently used test for diagnosing post-pancreatectomy PEI. Six studies compared the diagnostic accuracy of FE-1 with faecal fat tests or 13 C breath tests, finding no significant differences. Five studies reported on micronutrient deficiencies.
Conclusion: The FE-1 test is the most commonly used diagnostic tool for post-pancreatectomy PEI; however, well-designed studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of various tests for PEI are lacking. Additionally, few studies report on micronutrient deficiencies, variations in anthropometric data or PEI-related patient-reported outcomes. Future studies should aim to establish a gold standard for diagnosis and severity assessment of post-pancreatectomy PEI and provide guidance for tailored pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy.