Development and Validation of the Patient Experience Assessment Scale (PXAS) in Tertiary Care Hospital - Oman.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2025-02-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735241311090
Naima Khamis Al-Bulushi, Zainab Ali Al-Mukhaini, Jehan Al Fannah, Afaf Ali Al Zadjali, Huda Al Zidi, Zubaida Mahmood Al-Balushi, Aida Khalfan Al-Hadidi, Samir Al-Adawi
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Patient Experience Assessment Scale (PXAS) in Tertiary Care Hospital - Oman.","authors":"Naima Khamis Al-Bulushi, Zainab Ali Al-Mukhaini, Jehan Al Fannah, Afaf Ali Al Zadjali, Huda Al Zidi, Zubaida Mahmood Al-Balushi, Aida Khalfan Al-Hadidi, Samir Al-Adawi","doi":"10.1177/23743735241311090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Evaluating the patient's perspective is crucial for high-quality healthcare. Traditional satisfaction surveys have limitations due to subjectivity. Valid ecological measures are lacking in non-western populations. <b>Objective:</b> Validate <i>Patient Experience Assessment Scale</i> (PXAS) for tertiary care hospital. <b>Methods:</b> The development of PXAS involved domain identification, scale creation, language review, and validity assessment. Experts crafted a 12-question scale with a net promoter score (NPS). Language experts reviewed for clarity and equivalence. The content and face validity were evaluated using the content validity index (CVI) and the face validity index. SPSS analyzed data for reliability and test-retest over 3 to 4 weeks. <b>Results:</b> 464 participants were included, mainly aged 31 to 40, participated. PXAS showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88) and test-retest (r = 0.72). The content validity (I-CVI: 0.83-1.0; S-CVI = 0.93) and the validity of the face (98.3% agreement) were excellent. Most were satisfied (45% excellent and 41.2% very good), and 37% would highly recommend the hospital. <b>Conclusions:</b> PXAS is reliable and valid scale to assess the patient experience in tertiary hospitals. Further studies of its properties are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"12 ","pages":"23743735241311090"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241311090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluating the patient's perspective is crucial for high-quality healthcare. Traditional satisfaction surveys have limitations due to subjectivity. Valid ecological measures are lacking in non-western populations. Objective: Validate Patient Experience Assessment Scale (PXAS) for tertiary care hospital. Methods: The development of PXAS involved domain identification, scale creation, language review, and validity assessment. Experts crafted a 12-question scale with a net promoter score (NPS). Language experts reviewed for clarity and equivalence. The content and face validity were evaluated using the content validity index (CVI) and the face validity index. SPSS analyzed data for reliability and test-retest over 3 to 4 weeks. Results: 464 participants were included, mainly aged 31 to 40, participated. PXAS showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88) and test-retest (r = 0.72). The content validity (I-CVI: 0.83-1.0; S-CVI = 0.93) and the validity of the face (98.3% agreement) were excellent. Most were satisfied (45% excellent and 41.2% very good), and 37% would highly recommend the hospital. Conclusions: PXAS is reliable and valid scale to assess the patient experience in tertiary hospitals. Further studies of its properties are warranted.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信