Efficacy of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation in populations with psychiatric and/or substance use problems: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Pub Date : 2025-02-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tpc/199473
Stéphanie Baggio, Philip Bruggmann, Anna Schoeni, Nazanin Abolhassani, Kali Tal, Susanne Pohle, Anja Frei, Jean-Paul Humair, Isabelle Jacot-Sadowski, Janine Vetsch, Luca Lehner, Anna Rihs, Laurent Gétaz, Aurélie Berthet, Moa Haller, Mirah Stuber, Julian Jakob, Reto Auer
{"title":"Efficacy of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation in populations with psychiatric and/or substance use problems: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Stéphanie Baggio, Philip Bruggmann, Anna Schoeni, Nazanin Abolhassani, Kali Tal, Susanne Pohle, Anja Frei, Jean-Paul Humair, Isabelle Jacot-Sadowski, Janine Vetsch, Luca Lehner, Anna Rihs, Laurent Gétaz, Aurélie Berthet, Moa Haller, Mirah Stuber, Julian Jakob, Reto Auer","doi":"10.18332/tpc/199473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People with psychiatric and substance use disorders are more likely to smoke and less likely to quit than smokers in the general population. We evaluated the efficacy of e-cigarettes for abstinence from tobacco smoking in people with psychiatric and substance use problems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data collected in the larger 'Efficacy, Safety, and Toxicology of ENDS as an Aid for Smoking Cessation' (ESTxENDS) trial (n=1246): the intervention group received e-cigarettes and e-liquids, plus standard-of-care smoking cessation counseling (SOC) for 6 months; the control group received SOC and a voucher. The primary outcome was biochemically validated continuous self-reported abstinence at 6 months; secondary outcomes included 6-month and 7-day self-reported abstinence. We calculated adjusted relative risks (ARR) for two subsamples meeting these conditions at the baseline visit: 1) psychotropic medication use; and 2) problematic substance or polysubstance use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the participants using psychotropic medications (n=239), the ARR for validated abstinence was 2.62 (95% CI: 1.40-4.90) in the intervention group versus the control group, 2.95 (95% CI: 1.72-5.07) for 6-month and 2.96 (95% CI: 1.92-4.55) for 7-day self-reported abstinence, while among participants with problematic substance or polysubstance use (n=818), the ARR was 1.57 (95% CI: 1.20-2.04), 1.42 (95% CI: 1.15-1.74), and 1.53 (95% CI: 1.31-1.79), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding e-cigarettes to standard-of-care counseling increased the likelihood that participants with psychiatric and substance use problems would abstain from smoking, but larger studies should test the efficacy and safety of smoking cessation interventions in this often-marginalized population.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":"11 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/199473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: People with psychiatric and substance use disorders are more likely to smoke and less likely to quit than smokers in the general population. We evaluated the efficacy of e-cigarettes for abstinence from tobacco smoking in people with psychiatric and substance use problems.

Methods: We analyzed data collected in the larger 'Efficacy, Safety, and Toxicology of ENDS as an Aid for Smoking Cessation' (ESTxENDS) trial (n=1246): the intervention group received e-cigarettes and e-liquids, plus standard-of-care smoking cessation counseling (SOC) for 6 months; the control group received SOC and a voucher. The primary outcome was biochemically validated continuous self-reported abstinence at 6 months; secondary outcomes included 6-month and 7-day self-reported abstinence. We calculated adjusted relative risks (ARR) for two subsamples meeting these conditions at the baseline visit: 1) psychotropic medication use; and 2) problematic substance or polysubstance use.

Results: Among the participants using psychotropic medications (n=239), the ARR for validated abstinence was 2.62 (95% CI: 1.40-4.90) in the intervention group versus the control group, 2.95 (95% CI: 1.72-5.07) for 6-month and 2.96 (95% CI: 1.92-4.55) for 7-day self-reported abstinence, while among participants with problematic substance or polysubstance use (n=818), the ARR was 1.57 (95% CI: 1.20-2.04), 1.42 (95% CI: 1.15-1.74), and 1.53 (95% CI: 1.31-1.79), respectively.

Conclusions: Adding e-cigarettes to standard-of-care counseling increased the likelihood that participants with psychiatric and substance use problems would abstain from smoking, but larger studies should test the efficacy and safety of smoking cessation interventions in this often-marginalized population.

电子烟对有精神和/或物质使用问题人群戒烟的疗效:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
与一般人群中的吸烟者相比,患有精神疾病和物质使用障碍的人吸烟的可能性更大,戒烟的可能性更小。我们评估了电子烟对有精神和物质使用问题的人戒烟的功效。方法:我们分析了更大规模的“ENDS作为戒烟辅助工具的有效性、安全性和毒理学”(ESTxENDS)试验(n=1246)中收集的数据:干预组接受电子烟和电子烟液,外加6个月的标准护理戒烟咨询(SOC);对照组收到SOC和代金券。主要终点是生化验证的6个月时持续自我报告禁欲;次要结果包括6个月和7天的自我报告禁欲。我们计算了基线就诊时满足以下条件的两个子样本的调整相对风险(ARR): 1)精神药物使用;2)问题物质或多种物质的使用。结果:在使用精神药物的参与者(n=239)中,干预组与对照组相比,有效戒断的ARR为2.62 (95% CI: 1.40-4.90), 6个月的ARR为2.95 (95% CI: 1.72-5.07), 7天自我报告戒断的ARR为2.96 (95% CI: 1.92-4.55),而在有问题物质或多种物质使用的参与者(n=818)中,ARR分别为1.57 (95% CI: 1.20-2.04), 1.42 (95% CI: 1.15-1.74)和1.53 (95% CI: 1.31-1.79)。结论:将电子烟添加到标准护理咨询中增加了有精神和物质使用问题的参与者戒烟的可能性,但更大规模的研究应该测试戒烟干预措施在这一经常被边缘化的人群中的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信