Navigating the dual role of physician and clinician investigator in end-of-life research.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Robert Deiss, Sara Gianella, Cheryl Dullano, Stephanie Solso, Susan J Little, Andy Kaytes, Jeff Taylor, Patricia K Riggs, Elizabeth Hastie, Davey Smith, Karine Dubé
{"title":"Navigating the dual role of physician and clinician investigator in end-of-life research.","authors":"Robert Deiss, Sara Gianella, Cheryl Dullano, Stephanie Solso, Susan J Little, Andy Kaytes, Jeff Taylor, Patricia K Riggs, Elizabeth Hastie, Davey Smith, Karine Dubé","doi":"10.1080/09540121.2025.2458629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The challenges of recruiting participants for end-of-life (EOL) research are multifaceted. The Last Gift study at the University of California San Diego, an observational study for people with HIV (PWH) with terminal illness, appeals to the altruism of potential participants and community of allied health providers. Involvement of the latter group highlights a potential ethical conundrum of a \"dual role\", as primary care providers (PCPs) navigate between clinical responsibilities to their patients, along with opportunities to discuss clinical research. To explore this conundrum and better understand study recruitment dynamics of the Last Gift study, we analyzed screening and enrollment data for a 12-month period (2022-2023). We found that PCPs can play an important role in the recruitment of PWH into EOL research, as having PCPs discuss the study with potential participants yielded more successful enrollments than contact by the study team alone. Our manuscript proposes considerations to mitigate dual role conflicts, including ensuring ethical awareness, prioritizing clinical care and offering strategies to involve PCPs in recruitment without causing unnecessary burden or coercion. These insights aim to guide similar EOL research efforts, emphasizing the need for balanced, ethical recruitment processes in the sensitive context of terminal illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48370,"journal":{"name":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2025.2458629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The challenges of recruiting participants for end-of-life (EOL) research are multifaceted. The Last Gift study at the University of California San Diego, an observational study for people with HIV (PWH) with terminal illness, appeals to the altruism of potential participants and community of allied health providers. Involvement of the latter group highlights a potential ethical conundrum of a "dual role", as primary care providers (PCPs) navigate between clinical responsibilities to their patients, along with opportunities to discuss clinical research. To explore this conundrum and better understand study recruitment dynamics of the Last Gift study, we analyzed screening and enrollment data for a 12-month period (2022-2023). We found that PCPs can play an important role in the recruitment of PWH into EOL research, as having PCPs discuss the study with potential participants yielded more successful enrollments than contact by the study team alone. Our manuscript proposes considerations to mitigate dual role conflicts, including ensuring ethical awareness, prioritizing clinical care and offering strategies to involve PCPs in recruitment without causing unnecessary burden or coercion. These insights aim to guide similar EOL research efforts, emphasizing the need for balanced, ethical recruitment processes in the sensitive context of terminal illness.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
172
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信