Patient-Generated Collections for Organizing Electronic Health Record Data to Elevate Personal Meaning, Improve Actionability, and Support Patient-Health Care Provider Communication: Think-Aloud Evaluation Study.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.2196/50331
Drashko Nakikj, David Kreda, Karan Luthria, Nils Gehlenborg
{"title":"Patient-Generated Collections for Organizing Electronic Health Record Data to Elevate Personal Meaning, Improve Actionability, and Support Patient-Health Care Provider Communication: Think-Aloud Evaluation Study.","authors":"Drashko Nakikj, David Kreda, Karan Luthria, Nils Gehlenborg","doi":"10.2196/50331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Through third party applications, patients in the United States have access to their electronic health record (EHR) data from multiple health care providers. However, these applications offer only a predefined organization of these records by type, time stamp, or provider, leaving out meaningful connections between them. This prevents patients from efficiently reviewing, exploring, and making sense of their EHR data based on current or ongoing health issues. The lack of personalized organization and important connections can limit patients' ability to use their data and make informed health decisions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To address these challenges, we created Discovery, an experimental app that enables patients to organize their medical records into collections, analogous to placing pictures in photo albums. These collections are based on the evolving understanding of the patients' past and ongoing health issues. The app also allows patients to add text notes to collections and their constituent records. By observing how patients used features to select records and assemble them into collections, our goal was to learn about their preferred mechanisms to complete these tasks and the challenges they would face in the wild. We also intended to become more informed about the various ways in which patients could and would like to use collections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a think-aloud evaluation study with 14 participants on synthetic data. In session 1, we obtained feedback on the mechanics for creating and assembling collections and adding notes. In session 2, we focused on reviewing collections, finding data patterns within them, and retaining insights, as well as exploring use cases. We conducted reflexive thematic analysis on the transcribed feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Collections were useful for personal use (quick access to information, reflection on medical history, tracking health, journaling, and learning from past experiences) and clinical visits (preparation and raising physicians' awareness). Assembling EHR data into reliable collections could be difficult for typical patients due to considerable manual work and lack of medical knowledge. However, automated collection building could alleviate this issue. Furthermore, having EHR data organized in collections may have limited use. However, augmenting them with patient-generated data, which are entered with flexible richness and structure, could add context, elevate meaning, and improve actionability. Finally, collections might produce a misconstrued health picture, but bringing the physician in the loop for verification could increase their clinical validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collections can be a powerful tool for advancing patients' proactivity, awareness, and self-advocacy, potentially facilitating patient-centered care. However, patients need better support for incorporating their own everyday data and adding meaningful annotations for future reference. Improvements in the comprehensiveness, efficiency, and reliability of the collection assembly process through automation are also necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"12 ","pages":"e50331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/50331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Through third party applications, patients in the United States have access to their electronic health record (EHR) data from multiple health care providers. However, these applications offer only a predefined organization of these records by type, time stamp, or provider, leaving out meaningful connections between them. This prevents patients from efficiently reviewing, exploring, and making sense of their EHR data based on current or ongoing health issues. The lack of personalized organization and important connections can limit patients' ability to use their data and make informed health decisions.

Objective: To address these challenges, we created Discovery, an experimental app that enables patients to organize their medical records into collections, analogous to placing pictures in photo albums. These collections are based on the evolving understanding of the patients' past and ongoing health issues. The app also allows patients to add text notes to collections and their constituent records. By observing how patients used features to select records and assemble them into collections, our goal was to learn about their preferred mechanisms to complete these tasks and the challenges they would face in the wild. We also intended to become more informed about the various ways in which patients could and would like to use collections.

Methods: We conducted a think-aloud evaluation study with 14 participants on synthetic data. In session 1, we obtained feedback on the mechanics for creating and assembling collections and adding notes. In session 2, we focused on reviewing collections, finding data patterns within them, and retaining insights, as well as exploring use cases. We conducted reflexive thematic analysis on the transcribed feedback.

Results: Collections were useful for personal use (quick access to information, reflection on medical history, tracking health, journaling, and learning from past experiences) and clinical visits (preparation and raising physicians' awareness). Assembling EHR data into reliable collections could be difficult for typical patients due to considerable manual work and lack of medical knowledge. However, automated collection building could alleviate this issue. Furthermore, having EHR data organized in collections may have limited use. However, augmenting them with patient-generated data, which are entered with flexible richness and structure, could add context, elevate meaning, and improve actionability. Finally, collections might produce a misconstrued health picture, but bringing the physician in the loop for verification could increase their clinical validity.

Conclusions: Collections can be a powerful tool for advancing patients' proactivity, awareness, and self-advocacy, potentially facilitating patient-centered care. However, patients need better support for incorporating their own everyday data and adding meaningful annotations for future reference. Improvements in the comprehensiveness, efficiency, and reliability of the collection assembly process through automation are also necessary.

组织电子健康记录数据以提高个人意义、提高可操作性和支持患者-医疗保健提供者沟通的患者生成集合:有声思考评估研究。
背景:通过第三方应用程序,美国的患者可以从多个医疗保健提供者那里访问他们的电子健康记录(EHR)数据。但是,这些应用程序仅按类型、时间戳或提供者提供这些记录的预定义组织,而忽略了它们之间有意义的连接。这使患者无法根据当前或正在进行的健康问题有效地审查、探索和理解他们的EHR数据。缺乏个性化的组织和重要的联系可能会限制患者使用他们的数据并做出明智的健康决定的能力。目的:为了应对这些挑战,我们创建了Discovery,这是一款实验性应用程序,可以让患者将他们的医疗记录整理成收藏,类似于将照片放入相册。这些收集是基于对患者过去和正在进行的健康问题的不断发展的理解。该应用程序还允许患者将文本注释添加到集合及其组成记录中。通过观察患者如何使用特征来选择记录并将其组合成集合,我们的目标是了解他们完成这些任务的首选机制以及他们在野外将面临的挑战。我们还打算更多地了解患者可以和愿意使用收藏品的各种方式。方法:我们对14名参与者进行了一项合成数据的有声思维评估研究。在会话1中,我们获得了关于创建和组装集合以及添加注释的机制的反馈。在第2部分中,我们关注于审查集合,在其中查找数据模式,保留见解,以及探索用例。我们对转录的反馈进行反思性专题分析。结果:收集的资料可用于个人使用(快速获取信息、反思病史、跟踪健康状况、记录日志和吸取过去的经验)和临床访问(准备和提高医生的认识)。由于大量的手工工作和缺乏医学知识,对典型患者来说,将电子病历数据收集成可靠的数据可能很困难。但是,自动收集构建可以缓解这个问题。此外,将EHR数据组织在集合中可能用途有限。然而,用患者生成的数据来增强它们,这些数据以灵活的丰富性和结构输入,可以增加上下文,提升意义,并提高可操作性。最后,采集数据可能会产生一种误解的健康状况,但让医生参与核实可以提高他们的临床有效性。结论:收集可以是一个强大的工具,提高患者的主动性,意识和自我倡导,潜在地促进以患者为中心的护理。然而,患者需要更好的支持来整合他们自己的日常数据,并添加有意义的注释以供将来参考。通过自动化提高收集装配过程的全面性、效率和可靠性也是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信