Investigation of impact of split treatment on finished water quality for the Ames water treatment plant.

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Nicole Martindale, Timothy G Ellis, Matthew Jacob, Lyle Hammes, Gary Eshelman
{"title":"Investigation of impact of split treatment on finished water quality for the Ames water treatment plant.","authors":"Nicole Martindale, Timothy G Ellis, Matthew Jacob, Lyle Hammes, Gary Eshelman","doi":"10.1002/wer.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In response to limited carbon dioxide availability and increasing costs during the COVID-19 pandemic, an investigation into split treatment was performed. A 2020 pilot study showed that a 5% raw water bypass and target caustic alkalinity range of 26-36 mg/L as CaCO<sub>3</sub> resulted in 25% and 7% carbon dioxide and lime savings, respectively. Considering this promising outcome, the potential for scaling and corrosion within the plant was evaluated during a subsequent split treatment trial in this study. Mild steel scale coupons were assessed for scaling and corrosion at four different treatment conditions. These results found that a 5% raw water bypass is predicted to have a minimal impact of scaling and corrosion on the water plant infrastructure when compared to full lime softening. Results are significant since split treatment can save over $150,000 annually with no apparent change in water quality, improving the plant's resilience and sustainability. PRACTITIONER POINTS: A 5% raw water bypass produced scale and corrosion similar to full lime softening. Localized build-up results in surface corrosion. Relocation of SHMP did not show appreciable sequestration of hardness ions. Adjusting dosage and/or using a polyphosphate blend is recommended. A 5% raw water bypass can be implemented at a lime softening facility to reduce chemical usage and cost. A similar procedure can be conducted to analyze the impacts of a larger percent bypass for additional chemical savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23621,"journal":{"name":"Water Environment Research","volume":"97 2","pages":"e70019"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Environment Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.70019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In response to limited carbon dioxide availability and increasing costs during the COVID-19 pandemic, an investigation into split treatment was performed. A 2020 pilot study showed that a 5% raw water bypass and target caustic alkalinity range of 26-36 mg/L as CaCO3 resulted in 25% and 7% carbon dioxide and lime savings, respectively. Considering this promising outcome, the potential for scaling and corrosion within the plant was evaluated during a subsequent split treatment trial in this study. Mild steel scale coupons were assessed for scaling and corrosion at four different treatment conditions. These results found that a 5% raw water bypass is predicted to have a minimal impact of scaling and corrosion on the water plant infrastructure when compared to full lime softening. Results are significant since split treatment can save over $150,000 annually with no apparent change in water quality, improving the plant's resilience and sustainability. PRACTITIONER POINTS: A 5% raw water bypass produced scale and corrosion similar to full lime softening. Localized build-up results in surface corrosion. Relocation of SHMP did not show appreciable sequestration of hardness ions. Adjusting dosage and/or using a polyphosphate blend is recommended. A 5% raw water bypass can be implemented at a lime softening facility to reduce chemical usage and cost. A similar procedure can be conducted to analyze the impacts of a larger percent bypass for additional chemical savings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Environment Research
Water Environment Research 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
11 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1928, Water Environment Research (WER) is an international multidisciplinary water resource management journal for the dissemination of fundamental and applied research in all scientific and technical areas related to water quality and resource recovery. WER''s goal is to foster communication and interdisciplinary research between water sciences and related fields such as environmental toxicology, agriculture, public and occupational health, microbiology, and ecology. In addition to original research articles, short communications, case studies, reviews, and perspectives are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信