A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between dimensional psychopathology, gray matter structure, and dementia status in older adulthood.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Nicholas Hoy, Monika Waszczuk, Matthew Sunderland, Samantha J Lynch, Perminder S Sachdev, Henry Brodaty, Simone Reppermund, Louise Mewton
{"title":"A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between dimensional psychopathology, gray matter structure, and dementia status in older adulthood.","authors":"Nicholas Hoy, Monika Waszczuk, Matthew Sunderland, Samantha J Lynch, Perminder S Sachdev, Henry Brodaty, Simone Reppermund, Louise Mewton","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724003490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The structure of psychopathology can be organized hierarchically into a set of transdiagnostic dimensional phenotypes. No studies have examined whether these phenotypes are associated with brain structure or dementia in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from a longitudinal study of older adults aged 70-90 years at baseline (<i>N</i> = 1072; 44.8% male). Confirmatory factor models were fit to baseline psychiatric symptoms, with model fit assessed via traditional fit indices, model-based reliability estimates, and evaluation of model parameters. Bayesian plausible values were generated from the best-fitting model for use in subsequent analyses. Linear mixed models examined intraindividual change in global and regional gray matter volume (GMV) and cortical thickness over 6 years. Logistic regression examined whether symptom dimensions predicted incident dementia over 12 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A higher-order model showed a good fit to the data (BIC = 28,691.85; ssaBIC = 28,396.47; CFI = 0.926; TLI = 0.92; RMSEA = 0.047), including a general factor and lower-order dimensions of internalizing, disinhibited externalizing, and substance use. Baseline symptom dimensions did not predict change over time in total cortical and subcortical GMV or average cortical thickness; regional GMV or cortical thickness in the frontal, parietal, temporal, or occipital lobes; or regional GMV in the hippocampus and cerebellum (all <i>p</i>-values >0.5). Finally, baseline symptom dimensions did not predict incident dementia across follow-ups (all <i>p</i>-values >0.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no evidence that transdiagnostic dimensions are associated with gray matter structure or dementia in older adults. Future research should examine these relationships using psychiatric indicators capturing past history of chronic mental illness rather than current symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e5"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724003490","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The structure of psychopathology can be organized hierarchically into a set of transdiagnostic dimensional phenotypes. No studies have examined whether these phenotypes are associated with brain structure or dementia in older adults.

Methods: Data were drawn from a longitudinal study of older adults aged 70-90 years at baseline (N = 1072; 44.8% male). Confirmatory factor models were fit to baseline psychiatric symptoms, with model fit assessed via traditional fit indices, model-based reliability estimates, and evaluation of model parameters. Bayesian plausible values were generated from the best-fitting model for use in subsequent analyses. Linear mixed models examined intraindividual change in global and regional gray matter volume (GMV) and cortical thickness over 6 years. Logistic regression examined whether symptom dimensions predicted incident dementia over 12 years.

Results: A higher-order model showed a good fit to the data (BIC = 28,691.85; ssaBIC = 28,396.47; CFI = 0.926; TLI = 0.92; RMSEA = 0.047), including a general factor and lower-order dimensions of internalizing, disinhibited externalizing, and substance use. Baseline symptom dimensions did not predict change over time in total cortical and subcortical GMV or average cortical thickness; regional GMV or cortical thickness in the frontal, parietal, temporal, or occipital lobes; or regional GMV in the hippocampus and cerebellum (all p-values >0.5). Finally, baseline symptom dimensions did not predict incident dementia across follow-ups (all p-values >0.5).

Conclusions: We found no evidence that transdiagnostic dimensions are associated with gray matter structure or dementia in older adults. Future research should examine these relationships using psychiatric indicators capturing past history of chronic mental illness rather than current symptoms.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信