Suitability of Measures of Pharmacy-Based Medication Adherence for Routine Clinical Use Among Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S492461
Wardatul Jannah, Qisty A Khoiry, Sofa D Alfian, Rizky Abdulah
{"title":"Suitability of Measures of Pharmacy-Based Medication Adherence for Routine Clinical Use Among Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Wardatul Jannah, Qisty A Khoiry, Sofa D Alfian, Rizky Abdulah","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S492461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify the suitability of pharmacy-based measures for determining medication adherence in routine clinical use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained through PubMed and Scopus databases up to December 2023 without publication year restrictions. This review included English studies on assessing medication adherence for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes, using pharmacy databases and providing full-text access. We investigated evidence quality utilizing the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomized studies (cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional) and the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomized Studies-2 and JADAD scales for quasi-experiments and randomized control trials, respectively. We determined validity characteristics (completeness, accuracy, reliability, objectivity, continuous adherence history, non-intrusiveness, sensitivity, and specificity) and applicability (cost-effectiveness, ease of use, and interpretability) to evaluate the suitability of pharmacy-based medication adherence measures in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review retrieved 1513 studies, of which 74 met the inclusion criteria. All of the studies, which were published from 2000 to 2023 and mostly utilized a retrospective cohort design (n = 53), included 17.6 million patients. Of the 74 studies, 50 were conducted in the United States. Diabetes mellitus (n = 40) was the most prevalent disease, whereas the medication possession ratio (n = 46) and prescription days covered (n = 31) were the most prevalent pharmacy-based matrix. According to the results, 73 articles demonstrated validity characteristics, whereas 1 article lacked these characteristics. All 74 (100%) articles had applicability characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review demonstrates that pharmacy-based measures possess valid characteristics, including comprehensive, accurate, objective, reliable, and continuously updated adherence history records. These measures are designed to minimize disruption while offering high sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, they are characterized by their practicality, being cost-effective, easy to implement, and easy to interpret. These findings suggest that pharmacy-based measures are potentially suitable to assess medication adherence for routine clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"265-278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S492461","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To identify the suitability of pharmacy-based measures for determining medication adherence in routine clinical use.

Methods: Data were obtained through PubMed and Scopus databases up to December 2023 without publication year restrictions. This review included English studies on assessing medication adherence for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes, using pharmacy databases and providing full-text access. We investigated evidence quality utilizing the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomized studies (cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional) and the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomized Studies-2 and JADAD scales for quasi-experiments and randomized control trials, respectively. We determined validity characteristics (completeness, accuracy, reliability, objectivity, continuous adherence history, non-intrusiveness, sensitivity, and specificity) and applicability (cost-effectiveness, ease of use, and interpretability) to evaluate the suitability of pharmacy-based medication adherence measures in clinical settings.

Results: This review retrieved 1513 studies, of which 74 met the inclusion criteria. All of the studies, which were published from 2000 to 2023 and mostly utilized a retrospective cohort design (n = 53), included 17.6 million patients. Of the 74 studies, 50 were conducted in the United States. Diabetes mellitus (n = 40) was the most prevalent disease, whereas the medication possession ratio (n = 46) and prescription days covered (n = 31) were the most prevalent pharmacy-based matrix. According to the results, 73 articles demonstrated validity characteristics, whereas 1 article lacked these characteristics. All 74 (100%) articles had applicability characteristics.

Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrates that pharmacy-based measures possess valid characteristics, including comprehensive, accurate, objective, reliable, and continuously updated adherence history records. These measures are designed to minimize disruption while offering high sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, they are characterized by their practicality, being cost-effective, easy to implement, and easy to interpret. These findings suggest that pharmacy-based measures are potentially suitable to assess medication adherence for routine clinical use.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信