Preferences and Attitudes Towards Digital Communication and Symptom Reporting Methods in Clinical Trials.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S474535
Bryan McDowell, Kelly M Dumais, Sarah Tressel Gary, Ingeborg de Gooijer, Tomás Ward
{"title":"Preferences and Attitudes Towards Digital Communication and Symptom Reporting Methods in Clinical Trials.","authors":"Bryan McDowell, Kelly M Dumais, Sarah Tressel Gary, Ingeborg de Gooijer, Tomás Ward","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S474535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the growing use of digital health technologies (DHT) in clinical trials, the opportunity to use technology to promote greater patient centricity and inclusivity has emerged. Current technology provides various mechanisms for communication, eg, through voice or text, however, participant familiarity and preference for them is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to understand participants' communication preferences, their comfort with and use of messaging methods and their attitudes towards different communication and technology-driven symptom reporting methods in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Participants and methods: </strong>Fifty-five participants, with any form of chronic health condition or recent intervention causing daily pain or discomfort were recruited by way of convenience sample for a single-centre, non-interventional, single-visit study, conducted in Ireland. Participants completed a questionnaire on communications preferences via an app on the participants' own electronic device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In communication with friends and family, 69.6% of participants most preferred to use a messaging service. In communication with their healthcare provider, 72.7% preferred phone calls. Respondents preferred to communicate with friends/family via text messages (80.4%) over other methods. In clinical trial settings, participants are willing to use messaging methods to communicate with their physician. When reporting symptoms, most preferred a phone/video call to physicians (50.9%) and touch screen on device/smartphone (47.3%). 72.7% preferred to report symptoms using their own phone. Some respondents were interested in having the device read the questions/answers aloud (36.4%) and answer questions verbally (41.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants were familiar with various communication methods but showed different preferences to communicate with friends and family versus healthcare professionals. For reporting symptoms in a clinical trial while at home, split results suggested a preference for independent reporting as well as live communication with physician, perhaps reflecting the rising use of telehealth. Further exploration is needed for the use of questions read aloud or answered verbally when reporting symptoms in a clinical trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"255-263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S474535","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: With the growing use of digital health technologies (DHT) in clinical trials, the opportunity to use technology to promote greater patient centricity and inclusivity has emerged. Current technology provides various mechanisms for communication, eg, through voice or text, however, participant familiarity and preference for them is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to understand participants' communication preferences, their comfort with and use of messaging methods and their attitudes towards different communication and technology-driven symptom reporting methods in clinical trials.

Participants and methods: Fifty-five participants, with any form of chronic health condition or recent intervention causing daily pain or discomfort were recruited by way of convenience sample for a single-centre, non-interventional, single-visit study, conducted in Ireland. Participants completed a questionnaire on communications preferences via an app on the participants' own electronic device.

Results: In communication with friends and family, 69.6% of participants most preferred to use a messaging service. In communication with their healthcare provider, 72.7% preferred phone calls. Respondents preferred to communicate with friends/family via text messages (80.4%) over other methods. In clinical trial settings, participants are willing to use messaging methods to communicate with their physician. When reporting symptoms, most preferred a phone/video call to physicians (50.9%) and touch screen on device/smartphone (47.3%). 72.7% preferred to report symptoms using their own phone. Some respondents were interested in having the device read the questions/answers aloud (36.4%) and answer questions verbally (41.8%).

Conclusion: Participants were familiar with various communication methods but showed different preferences to communicate with friends and family versus healthcare professionals. For reporting symptoms in a clinical trial while at home, split results suggested a preference for independent reporting as well as live communication with physician, perhaps reflecting the rising use of telehealth. Further exploration is needed for the use of questions read aloud or answered verbally when reporting symptoms in a clinical trial.

临床试验中对数字通信和症状报告方法的偏好和态度。
目的:随着在临床试验中越来越多地使用数字卫生技术(DHT),利用技术促进更大程度上以患者为中心和包容性的机会已经出现。目前的技术提供了多种沟通机制,例如通过语音或文本,然而,参与者对它们的熟悉程度和偏好知之甚少。本研究的目的是了解参与者的沟通偏好,他们对信息传递方法的舒适度和使用情况,以及他们对临床试验中不同的沟通和技术驱动的症状报告方法的态度。参与者和方法:在爱尔兰进行了一项单中心、非介入性、单次访问研究,以方便抽样的方式招募了55名参与者,他们有任何形式的慢性健康状况或最近的干预措施,导致每天疼痛或不适。参与者通过自己的电子设备上的应用程序完成了一份关于通信偏好的调查问卷。结果:在与朋友和家人的交流中,69.6%的参与者最喜欢使用短信服务。在与医疗保健提供者沟通时,72.7%的人更喜欢打电话。受访者更喜欢用短信与朋友/家人沟通(80.4%)。在临床试验环境中,参与者愿意使用消息传递方法与他们的医生沟通。在报告症状时,大多数人倾向于电话/视频通话(50.9%)和设备/智能手机触摸屏(47.3%)。72.7%的人更喜欢用自己的手机报告症状。一些受访者对让设备大声读出问题/答案(36.4%)和口头回答问题(41.8%)感兴趣。结论:参与者熟悉各种沟通方式,但与医疗保健专业人员相比,他们对朋友和家人的沟通方式有不同的偏好。对于在家报告临床试验症状的问题,不同的结果表明,人们更倾向于独立报告以及与医生实时沟通,这可能反映了远程医疗的使用越来越多。在临床试验中报告症状时,大声朗读或口头回答问题的使用需要进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信