Malena Chiaborelli, Camila Volij, Karin S Kopitowski, Sergio A Terrasa
{"title":"[Excessive use of vitamin D testing in the private health system].","authors":"Malena Chiaborelli, Camila Volij, Karin S Kopitowski, Sergio A Terrasa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given the importance of reducing lowvalue care practices and acknowledging that vitamin D testing in the general population is rising despite the absence of evidence to support such conduct, we decided to investigate its overuse.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Design: cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>patients aged between 18 and 64 on the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Health Maintenance Organization membership list, to whom at least one test of vitamin D had been performed between July 1st and December 31st 2022. A sample of electronic medical records was manually analyzed. In the presence/suspicion of a clinical condition that counts with recommendation for Vitamin D testing, its indication was considered appropriate; however, in its absence, it was considered inappropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 095 vitamin D tests were performed on 9623 patients (mean age 47, 78.1% female). These patients were 10% of the 97 584 HMO members aged between 18 and 64 in 2022. A hundred and sixty of the 242 patients whose electronic medical records were analyzed (66%, CI 95% 60 - 72), did not have a clinical condition that justified vitamin D testing. The most frequent clinical conditions found for testing were osteopenia in 37/242 patients (15%); osteoporosis, 13/242 (5%) and chronic kidney disease 11/242 (5%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Two-thirds of the vitamin D tests performed did not have a clinical condition that justified the practice. These findings represent an opportunity to design strategies to institutionally reduce this low-value care practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":18419,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-buenos Aires","volume":"85 1","pages":"56-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-buenos Aires","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Given the importance of reducing lowvalue care practices and acknowledging that vitamin D testing in the general population is rising despite the absence of evidence to support such conduct, we decided to investigate its overuse.
Materials and methods: Design: cross-sectional study.
Data source: electronic medical records.
Population: patients aged between 18 and 64 on the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Health Maintenance Organization membership list, to whom at least one test of vitamin D had been performed between July 1st and December 31st 2022. A sample of electronic medical records was manually analyzed. In the presence/suspicion of a clinical condition that counts with recommendation for Vitamin D testing, its indication was considered appropriate; however, in its absence, it was considered inappropriate.
Results: A total of 10 095 vitamin D tests were performed on 9623 patients (mean age 47, 78.1% female). These patients were 10% of the 97 584 HMO members aged between 18 and 64 in 2022. A hundred and sixty of the 242 patients whose electronic medical records were analyzed (66%, CI 95% 60 - 72), did not have a clinical condition that justified vitamin D testing. The most frequent clinical conditions found for testing were osteopenia in 37/242 patients (15%); osteoporosis, 13/242 (5%) and chronic kidney disease 11/242 (5%).
Discussion: Two-thirds of the vitamin D tests performed did not have a clinical condition that justified the practice. These findings represent an opportunity to design strategies to institutionally reduce this low-value care practice.