Asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 infection in women prior to oocyte retrieval has no impact on embryo laboratory outcomes: a retrospective study.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
Yanhong Wu, Shenghao Wu, Weijue Su, Junzhao Zhao, Liangliang Ma
{"title":"Asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 infection in women prior to oocyte retrieval has no impact on embryo laboratory outcomes: a retrospective study.","authors":"Yanhong Wu, Shenghao Wu, Weijue Su, Junzhao Zhao, Liangliang Ma","doi":"10.1186/s13048-025-01601-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few previous studies have addressed the impact of COVID-19 infection status on assisted reproductive technology outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess whether COVID-19 infection affects ovulation induction outcomes and the laboratory outcomes of women undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 363 patients were divided into three groups: the COVID-19 infection group (group A, n = 49), the COVID-19 recovery group (group B, n = 119) and the COVID-19 non-infection group (group C, n = 195). Intergroup comparisons of baseline characteristics, stimulation characteristics and laboratory outcomes were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Gn dosage in group A was significantly higher than those in groups B and C. The duration of Gn treatment was longer in group A than in group B. In group B, the number of high-quality blastocysts was lower than that in group C. The rates of blastocyst formation (42.56%) and high-quality blastocyst formation (12.05%) in group B were significantly lower than those in group A (51.51%; P = 0.003, 16.58%; P = 0.026) and C (48.20%; P = 0.005, 16.49%; P = 0.002). The high-quality blastocyst rate in group C (34.20%) was the highest and was different from that in group B (28.33%). The main risk factor for high-quality blastocyst formation according to multivariate logistic regression analysis was recovery from COVID-19 (0.599, 95% CI: 0.360-0.996; P = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 infection prior to oocyte retrieval may not has a significant negative effect on ovulation induction outcomes or laboratory outcomes, although the number of Gn days and dose of Gn may increase. In addition, we should pay attention to infertile women recovering from COVID-19 infection and be aware of the significant reduction in the number of high-quality blastocysts in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ovarian Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ovarian Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-025-01601-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few previous studies have addressed the impact of COVID-19 infection status on assisted reproductive technology outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess whether COVID-19 infection affects ovulation induction outcomes and the laboratory outcomes of women undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment.

Methods: In total, 363 patients were divided into three groups: the COVID-19 infection group (group A, n = 49), the COVID-19 recovery group (group B, n = 119) and the COVID-19 non-infection group (group C, n = 195). Intergroup comparisons of baseline characteristics, stimulation characteristics and laboratory outcomes were performed.

Results: The Gn dosage in group A was significantly higher than those in groups B and C. The duration of Gn treatment was longer in group A than in group B. In group B, the number of high-quality blastocysts was lower than that in group C. The rates of blastocyst formation (42.56%) and high-quality blastocyst formation (12.05%) in group B were significantly lower than those in group A (51.51%; P = 0.003, 16.58%; P = 0.026) and C (48.20%; P = 0.005, 16.49%; P = 0.002). The high-quality blastocyst rate in group C (34.20%) was the highest and was different from that in group B (28.33%). The main risk factor for high-quality blastocyst formation according to multivariate logistic regression analysis was recovery from COVID-19 (0.599, 95% CI: 0.360-0.996; P = 0.048).

Conclusion: Asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 infection prior to oocyte retrieval may not has a significant negative effect on ovulation induction outcomes or laboratory outcomes, although the number of Gn days and dose of Gn may increase. In addition, we should pay attention to infertile women recovering from COVID-19 infection and be aware of the significant reduction in the number of high-quality blastocysts in this population.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ovarian Research
Journal of Ovarian Research REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
125
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ovarian Research is an open access, peer reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a forum for high-quality basic and clinical research on ovarian function, abnormalities, and cancer. The journal focuses on research that provides new insights into ovarian functions as well as prevention and treatment of diseases afflicting the organ. Topical areas include, but are not restricted to: Ovary development, hormone secretion and regulation Follicle growth and ovulation Infertility and Polycystic ovarian syndrome Regulation of pituitary and other biological functions by ovarian hormones Ovarian cancer, its prevention, diagnosis and treatment Drug development and screening Role of stem cells in ovary development and function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信