New Option for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Practice: Performance Evaluation of AutoMic-i600 Automatic System Based on Broth Microdilution Method.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infection and Drug Resistance Pub Date : 2025-01-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IDR.S499486
Chenyao Lin, Hui Zhang, Qiaoping Wu, Xuedan Qiu, Qingcao Li, Guangliang Wu
{"title":"New Option for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing in Clinical Practice: Performance Evaluation of AutoMic-i600 Automatic System Based on Broth Microdilution Method.","authors":"Chenyao Lin, Hui Zhang, Qiaoping Wu, Xuedan Qiu, Qingcao Li, Guangliang Wu","doi":"10.2147/IDR.S499486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria limits antibiotic efficacy, making accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) essential for clinical decisions. Broth microdilution (BMD) is the gold standard but is impractical for routine application. Current automated AST systems improve efficiency but face accuracy or operational challenges, highlighting the need for reliable and user-friendly solutions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the performance of a novel automated AST system (AutoMic-i600) based on the BMD method for AST of common clinical bacteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 229 clinical isolates (150 Gram-negative and 79 Gram-positive) were prospectively collected from microbiology laboratory between June 2023 and August 2023. We reported the comparison of the AutoMic-i600 and Vitek 2 systems for routine antibiotics, and also validated the detection performance of AutoMic-i600 for novel antibiotics, based on the BMD method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall essential agreement (EA) and categorical agreement (CA) between AutoMic-i600 and BMD were 93.2% and 93.5% for Gram-negative bacteria and 98.5% and 97.8% for Gram-positive bacteria, respectively. The overall EA and CA between Vitek 2 and BMD were 92.6% and 93.5% for Gram-negative bacteria and 97.9% and 97.4% for Gram-positive bacteria. Importantly, for drug-resistant bacteria, AutoMic-i600 demonstrated a higher overall agreement than Vitek 2 (EA: 98.1% vs 94.8%, CA: 97.5% vs 92.0%), especially in Gram-negative bacteria (EA: 97.7% vs 93.5%, CA: 97.7% vs 89.3%). The VME rate for Gram-negative bacteria using AutoMic-i600 was significantly lower than that of Vitek 2 (1.0% vs 2.9%). Novel antibiotics detected by AutoMic-i600 exhibited EA and CA rates exceeding 90.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these findings, we recommend that the AutoMic-i600 system could be a new option for routine AST testing in a clinical setting. Particularly for drug-resistant bacteria and novel antibiotics, detection with AutoMic-i600 may be more reliable, which could further contribute to the prevention and treatment of drug-resistant bacteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":13577,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Drug Resistance","volume":"18 ","pages":"543-556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Drug Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S499486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria limits antibiotic efficacy, making accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) essential for clinical decisions. Broth microdilution (BMD) is the gold standard but is impractical for routine application. Current automated AST systems improve efficiency but face accuracy or operational challenges, highlighting the need for reliable and user-friendly solutions.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the performance of a novel automated AST system (AutoMic-i600) based on the BMD method for AST of common clinical bacteria.

Methods: A total of 229 clinical isolates (150 Gram-negative and 79 Gram-positive) were prospectively collected from microbiology laboratory between June 2023 and August 2023. We reported the comparison of the AutoMic-i600 and Vitek 2 systems for routine antibiotics, and also validated the detection performance of AutoMic-i600 for novel antibiotics, based on the BMD method.

Results: The overall essential agreement (EA) and categorical agreement (CA) between AutoMic-i600 and BMD were 93.2% and 93.5% for Gram-negative bacteria and 98.5% and 97.8% for Gram-positive bacteria, respectively. The overall EA and CA between Vitek 2 and BMD were 92.6% and 93.5% for Gram-negative bacteria and 97.9% and 97.4% for Gram-positive bacteria. Importantly, for drug-resistant bacteria, AutoMic-i600 demonstrated a higher overall agreement than Vitek 2 (EA: 98.1% vs 94.8%, CA: 97.5% vs 92.0%), especially in Gram-negative bacteria (EA: 97.7% vs 93.5%, CA: 97.7% vs 89.3%). The VME rate for Gram-negative bacteria using AutoMic-i600 was significantly lower than that of Vitek 2 (1.0% vs 2.9%). Novel antibiotics detected by AutoMic-i600 exhibited EA and CA rates exceeding 90.0%.

Conclusion: Based on these findings, we recommend that the AutoMic-i600 system could be a new option for routine AST testing in a clinical setting. Particularly for drug-resistant bacteria and novel antibiotics, detection with AutoMic-i600 may be more reliable, which could further contribute to the prevention and treatment of drug-resistant bacteria.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection and Drug Resistance
Infection and Drug Resistance Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
826
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: About Journal Editors Peer Reviewers Articles Article Publishing Charges Aims and Scope Call For Papers ISSN: 1178-6973 Editor-in-Chief: Professor Suresh Antony An international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the optimal treatment of infection (bacterial, fungal and viral) and the development and institution of preventative strategies to minimize the development and spread of resistance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信