Muscular Injury is a Risk Factor for Post-Entire Circumferential Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Stricture.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Daisuke Azuma, Kingo Hirasawa, Reo Atsusaka, Yuichiro Ozeki, Atsushi Sawada, Masafumi Nshio, Ryosuke Kobayashi, Chiko Sato, Shin Maeda
{"title":"Muscular Injury is a Risk Factor for Post-Entire Circumferential Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Stricture.","authors":"Daisuke Azuma, Kingo Hirasawa, Reo Atsusaka, Yuichiro Ozeki, Atsushi Sawada, Masafumi Nshio, Ryosuke Kobayashi, Chiko Sato, Shin Maeda","doi":"10.1159/000543846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a widely adopted treatment for early esophageal cancer. However, extensive mucosal defects resulting from ESD pose a significant risk of post-procedural strictures. Despite efforts to prevent strictures through various means, including steroid administration, they remain a challenge, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and healthcare costs. Thus, identifying risk factors for refractory strictures following entire circumferential esophageal ESD (EC-E-ESD) is imperative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between July 2013 and September 2023, 49 patients who underwent EC-E-ESD were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified based on the presence of refractory or non-refractory strictures. A refractory stricture was defined as requiring six or more endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) procedures before stricture improvement. Clinicopathological features and outcomes were examined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Refractory strictures were observed in 51% of patients. A comparison showed that the refractory group had a significantly higher percentage of muscular injury (52% vs. 8%, p=0.002) and mucosal defect length ≥50 mm (68% vs. 37%, p=0.047) than the non-refractory group. Multivariate analysis showed that muscular injury (odds ratio 16.2; 95% confidence interval: 2.04-129.1) was an independent risk factor for refractory strictures after EC-E-ESD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Muscular injury during EC-E-ESD is a risk factor for refractory strictures. Strategies to prevent injury, such as meticulous dissection techniques, and effective steroid administration, may mitigate this risk. However, current prophylactic measures are inadequate, highlighting the need for further research into preventive strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11294,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543846","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a widely adopted treatment for early esophageal cancer. However, extensive mucosal defects resulting from ESD pose a significant risk of post-procedural strictures. Despite efforts to prevent strictures through various means, including steroid administration, they remain a challenge, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and healthcare costs. Thus, identifying risk factors for refractory strictures following entire circumferential esophageal ESD (EC-E-ESD) is imperative.

Methods: Between July 2013 and September 2023, 49 patients who underwent EC-E-ESD were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified based on the presence of refractory or non-refractory strictures. A refractory stricture was defined as requiring six or more endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) procedures before stricture improvement. Clinicopathological features and outcomes were examined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: Refractory strictures were observed in 51% of patients. A comparison showed that the refractory group had a significantly higher percentage of muscular injury (52% vs. 8%, p=0.002) and mucosal defect length ≥50 mm (68% vs. 37%, p=0.047) than the non-refractory group. Multivariate analysis showed that muscular injury (odds ratio 16.2; 95% confidence interval: 2.04-129.1) was an independent risk factor for refractory strictures after EC-E-ESD.

Conclusions: Muscular injury during EC-E-ESD is a risk factor for refractory strictures. Strategies to prevent injury, such as meticulous dissection techniques, and effective steroid administration, may mitigate this risk. However, current prophylactic measures are inadequate, highlighting the need for further research into preventive strategies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases
Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Each issue of this journal is dedicated to a special topic of current interest, covering both clinical and basic science topics in gastrointestinal function and disorders. The contents of each issue are comprehensive and reflect the state of the art, featuring editorials, reviews, mini reviews and original papers. These individual contributions encompass a variety of disciplines including all fields of gastroenterology. ''Digestive Diseases'' bridges the communication gap between advances made in the academic setting and their application in patient care. The journal is a valuable service for clinicians, specialists and physicians-in-training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信