Measuring Well-Being Influencers: Development and Validation of the WISH Inventory.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
K Elliott Higgins, Theodora Wingert, Elizabeth W Duggan, Maxwell Mansolf, Jose Hernandez Carcamo, Christine Park
{"title":"Measuring Well-Being Influencers: Development and Validation of the WISH Inventory.","authors":"K Elliott Higgins, Theodora Wingert, Elizabeth W Duggan, Maxwell Mansolf, Jose Hernandez Carcamo, Christine Park","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improving healthcare professional well-being and reducing burnout requires improving work ecosystems and cultures. Current well-being metrics focus on distal outcomes within individuals (e.g., professional fulfillment or burnout). In this study, we developed and evaluated the performance of an inventory measuring perceptions of modifiable workplace dimensions-termed influencers-that shape healthcare professionals' well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A core team developed the Well-Being Influencers Survey for Healthcare (WISH), an inventory designed to measure these systemic, occupational well-being influencers (e.g., leadership support, psychological safety, working conditions). Following content validation and refinement, 223 healthcare professionals from an academic department of anesthesiology completed WISH alongside established well-being measures, including the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), PROMIS short forms for meaning, purpose, and life satisfaction, as well as standard items of affective commitment (AC, a measure of engagement) and a standard item assessing intention to leave (ITL). Factor analysis was used to assess WISH's internal structure, while correlation and regression analyses assessed its criterion-related validity using the above established measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WISH showed expected relationships with established well-being measures, and outperformed established metrics in predicting AC and ITL after adjusting for those measures and/or covariates. Factor analysis indicated that most WISH variance reflects a single common factor, supporting the use of an instrument-level score. Unique variance at the influencer level highlights the added value of examining influencer scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>WISH fills a key gap in healthcare professional well-being improvement science by assessing causal factors of well-being and burnout, rather than the conditions themselves. Here, we established initial validity of this unique inventory and further reinforce the relevance of system-level and cultural factors in influencing healthcare professionals' well-being. WISH is well suited to assist healthcare professional well-being improvement efforts driven by system-improvement mindsets.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005401","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Improving healthcare professional well-being and reducing burnout requires improving work ecosystems and cultures. Current well-being metrics focus on distal outcomes within individuals (e.g., professional fulfillment or burnout). In this study, we developed and evaluated the performance of an inventory measuring perceptions of modifiable workplace dimensions-termed influencers-that shape healthcare professionals' well-being.

Methods: A core team developed the Well-Being Influencers Survey for Healthcare (WISH), an inventory designed to measure these systemic, occupational well-being influencers (e.g., leadership support, psychological safety, working conditions). Following content validation and refinement, 223 healthcare professionals from an academic department of anesthesiology completed WISH alongside established well-being measures, including the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), PROMIS short forms for meaning, purpose, and life satisfaction, as well as standard items of affective commitment (AC, a measure of engagement) and a standard item assessing intention to leave (ITL). Factor analysis was used to assess WISH's internal structure, while correlation and regression analyses assessed its criterion-related validity using the above established measures.

Results: WISH showed expected relationships with established well-being measures, and outperformed established metrics in predicting AC and ITL after adjusting for those measures and/or covariates. Factor analysis indicated that most WISH variance reflects a single common factor, supporting the use of an instrument-level score. Unique variance at the influencer level highlights the added value of examining influencer scores.

Conclusions: WISH fills a key gap in healthcare professional well-being improvement science by assessing causal factors of well-being and burnout, rather than the conditions themselves. Here, we established initial validity of this unique inventory and further reinforce the relevance of system-level and cultural factors in influencing healthcare professionals' well-being. WISH is well suited to assist healthcare professional well-being improvement efforts driven by system-improvement mindsets.

衡量幸福的影响因素:WISH调查表的开发与验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信