Effects of stocking densities on growth, organ index, serum biochemistry, gut morphology and microbiota of young ducks in a rice-duck-crayfish coculture system.

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Xiao Long He, Zhen Hua Liang, Ze Heng Huang, Yan Wu, Jia Liu, Tao Huang, Jing Bo Liu, Jin Song Pi, Hao Zhang
{"title":"Effects of stocking densities on growth, organ index, serum biochemistry, gut morphology and microbiota of young ducks in a rice-duck-crayfish coculture system.","authors":"Xiao Long He, Zhen Hua Liang, Ze Heng Huang, Yan Wu, Jia Liu, Tao Huang, Jing Bo Liu, Jin Song Pi, Hao Zhang","doi":"10.5713/ab.24.0488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The rice-duck-crayfish (RDC) coculture system, an ecologically efficient breeding method, supports ducks' natural habits and enhances duck welfare. However, the optimal stocking density and its influence on duck health in this system remains undetermined. The study examined the effects of stocking densities on growth, organ index, serum biochemistry, gut morphology and microbiota of ducks in RDC system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of five hundred and forty 20-day-old Nonghu No. 2 ducks were randomly divided into low-density (8 birds/666.67 m2, LD), medium-density (12 birds/666.67 m2, MD) and high-density (16 birds/666.67 m2, HD) groups, with three replicates in each group, and the symbiosis period was up to 40 days until rice tasselling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in final body weight, average daily gain, or feed:gain ratio between groups (p>0.05); the liver and spleen indices of ducks in HD group were significantly greater than in LD group (p<0.05); the serum albumin concentration in HD group decreased, whereas creatine kinase activity increased (p<0.05); the ileal crypt depth significantly increased; and the ileal villus height and villus/crypt ratio significantly decreased in ducks in MD and HD groups than in LD group (p<0.05). Additionally, the abundance of cecal Deferribacterota and Spirochaetota increased significantly (p<0.05), while the abundance of Firmicutes decreased significantly (p<0.05) with increasing stocking density. Moreover, the increase in stocking density significantly decreased the abundance of some beneficial bacteria (Faecalibacterium and Fournierella) and increased the abundance of some harmful bacteria (Mucispirillum and Brachyspira) (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These preliminary results suggest that moderately high-density breeding doesn't significantly affect duck growth, but increased stocking density led to changes in cecal microbiota and dysbiosis. Reducing stocking density positively affects immune parameters and ileum morphology.However, due to the limited number of total replicates of the study, further research is needed to validate the reliability of the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":7825,"journal":{"name":"Animal Bioscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Bioscience","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.24.0488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The rice-duck-crayfish (RDC) coculture system, an ecologically efficient breeding method, supports ducks' natural habits and enhances duck welfare. However, the optimal stocking density and its influence on duck health in this system remains undetermined. The study examined the effects of stocking densities on growth, organ index, serum biochemistry, gut morphology and microbiota of ducks in RDC system.

Methods: A total of five hundred and forty 20-day-old Nonghu No. 2 ducks were randomly divided into low-density (8 birds/666.67 m2, LD), medium-density (12 birds/666.67 m2, MD) and high-density (16 birds/666.67 m2, HD) groups, with three replicates in each group, and the symbiosis period was up to 40 days until rice tasselling.

Results: There were no significant differences in final body weight, average daily gain, or feed:gain ratio between groups (p>0.05); the liver and spleen indices of ducks in HD group were significantly greater than in LD group (p<0.05); the serum albumin concentration in HD group decreased, whereas creatine kinase activity increased (p<0.05); the ileal crypt depth significantly increased; and the ileal villus height and villus/crypt ratio significantly decreased in ducks in MD and HD groups than in LD group (p<0.05). Additionally, the abundance of cecal Deferribacterota and Spirochaetota increased significantly (p<0.05), while the abundance of Firmicutes decreased significantly (p<0.05) with increasing stocking density. Moreover, the increase in stocking density significantly decreased the abundance of some beneficial bacteria (Faecalibacterium and Fournierella) and increased the abundance of some harmful bacteria (Mucispirillum and Brachyspira) (p<0.05).

Conclusion: These preliminary results suggest that moderately high-density breeding doesn't significantly affect duck growth, but increased stocking density led to changes in cecal microbiota and dysbiosis. Reducing stocking density positively affects immune parameters and ileum morphology.However, due to the limited number of total replicates of the study, further research is needed to validate the reliability of the results.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Bioscience
Animal Bioscience AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
223
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信