Untapped capacity of place-based peer-to-peer resource sharing for community resilience

Zhengyang Li, Katherine Idziorek, Anthony Chen, Cynthia Chen
{"title":"Untapped capacity of place-based peer-to-peer resource sharing for community resilience","authors":"Zhengyang Li, Katherine Idziorek, Anthony Chen, Cynthia Chen","doi":"10.1038/s44284-024-00175-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During and after a disaster, people share resources with family, friends and neighbors to tide them over difficult times. The conventional top-down approach for disaster relief overlooks the wealth of critical resources that exist within communities. Here we explicitly model place-based peer-to-peer (P2P) resource sharing and evaluate its impact on community resilience to disasters. Using data from two urban communities in Seattle, Washington State, we confirm substantial untapped capacity for enhanced community resilience through place-based P2P resource sharing. Under a 5-day isolation scenario, place-based P2P sharing can reduce a community’s resilience loss by 13.4–100%; on average, 22–44 social ties per household support an 80% sharing rate of surplus resources. These findings suggest that place-based P2P sharing could be a viable strategy for disaster response across US communities, in addition to the current, government-led effort. Our methodological framework is transferable to other urban communities interested in enhancing disaster resilience. Using two socioeconomically different neighborhoods in Seattle, this study shows that place-based peer-to-peer resource sharing can substantially improve community resilience in both types of neighborhoods. Strong ties were about 1.5–3 times as effective as weak ties, and the neighborhood with lower socioeconomic status (SES) required more ties to achieve an optimal sharing rate than the neighborhood with higher SES.","PeriodicalId":501700,"journal":{"name":"Nature Cities","volume":"2 1","pages":"47-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-024-00175-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During and after a disaster, people share resources with family, friends and neighbors to tide them over difficult times. The conventional top-down approach for disaster relief overlooks the wealth of critical resources that exist within communities. Here we explicitly model place-based peer-to-peer (P2P) resource sharing and evaluate its impact on community resilience to disasters. Using data from two urban communities in Seattle, Washington State, we confirm substantial untapped capacity for enhanced community resilience through place-based P2P resource sharing. Under a 5-day isolation scenario, place-based P2P sharing can reduce a community’s resilience loss by 13.4–100%; on average, 22–44 social ties per household support an 80% sharing rate of surplus resources. These findings suggest that place-based P2P sharing could be a viable strategy for disaster response across US communities, in addition to the current, government-led effort. Our methodological framework is transferable to other urban communities interested in enhancing disaster resilience. Using two socioeconomically different neighborhoods in Seattle, this study shows that place-based peer-to-peer resource sharing can substantially improve community resilience in both types of neighborhoods. Strong ties were about 1.5–3 times as effective as weak ties, and the neighborhood with lower socioeconomic status (SES) required more ties to achieve an optimal sharing rate than the neighborhood with higher SES.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信