Anna E. S. Vincent, Jennifer L. Tank, Shannon L. Speir, Elise D. Snyder, Abagael N. Pruitt, Ursula H. Mahl, Robert O. Hall Jr.
{"title":"Confirming the Primacy of Light Controlling Ammonium Removal in Response to Biofilm Colonization and Shade Using Experimental Streams","authors":"Anna E. S. Vincent, Jennifer L. Tank, Shannon L. Speir, Elise D. Snyder, Abagael N. Pruitt, Ursula H. Mahl, Robert O. Hall Jr.","doi":"10.1029/2024JG008259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The removal of riparian shading alters stream biogeochemical cycling by stimulating algal biofilms through the release of light limitation. Few studies have examined the combined effects of shading and biofilm growth on ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N) and nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N) removal in the same experiment. We quantified water column NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N removal using <i>n</i> = 176 short-term additions in four experimental streams over 2 years and assessed the influence of shading (shaded vs. open canopy) and biofilm colonization (early vs. late) on removal using a Bayesian three-level hierarchical model. First, we assessed the roles of biofilm and shade on NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N removal. Shading lowered NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N uptake velocity [<i>V</i><sub><i>f</i></sub>; slope: −0.45 (−0.69, −0.22)], while the effect of biofilm was too small to detect [0.06 (−0.18, 0.29)]. The following season, we compared NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N removal, and added night releases to estimate autotrophic and heterotrophic contributions to removal. Shading reduced NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N <i>V</i><sub><i>f</i></sub>, while the effect of biofilm often depended on shading. NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N <i>V</i><sub><i>f</i></sub> was higher than NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N <i>V</i><sub><i>f</i></sub> by 51% during the day and 38% at night, confirming preferential NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N removal. NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N <i>V</i><sub><i>f</i></sub> declined more between the Late-Open and Late-Shade phases compared to NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N, suggesting a stronger decline in NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N demand than for NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N with shade during late biofilm colonization. We found no strong diel shift in NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N or NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N demand. Results demonstrate the primacy of light on NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N removal in streams. Understanding how shading and biofilm colonization alter removal is critical as streams are vulnerable to the impacts of land use change.</p>","PeriodicalId":16003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","volume":"130 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JG008259","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JG008259","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The removal of riparian shading alters stream biogeochemical cycling by stimulating algal biofilms through the release of light limitation. Few studies have examined the combined effects of shading and biofilm growth on ammonium (NH4+–N) and nitrate (NO3−–N) removal in the same experiment. We quantified water column NH4+–N and NO3−–N removal using n = 176 short-term additions in four experimental streams over 2 years and assessed the influence of shading (shaded vs. open canopy) and biofilm colonization (early vs. late) on removal using a Bayesian three-level hierarchical model. First, we assessed the roles of biofilm and shade on NH4+–N removal. Shading lowered NH4+–N uptake velocity [Vf; slope: −0.45 (−0.69, −0.22)], while the effect of biofilm was too small to detect [0.06 (−0.18, 0.29)]. The following season, we compared NH4+–N and NO3−–N removal, and added night releases to estimate autotrophic and heterotrophic contributions to removal. Shading reduced NH4+–N and NO3−–N Vf, while the effect of biofilm often depended on shading. NH4+–N Vf was higher than NO3−–N Vf by 51% during the day and 38% at night, confirming preferential NH4+–N removal. NO3−–N Vf declined more between the Late-Open and Late-Shade phases compared to NH4+–N, suggesting a stronger decline in NO3−–N demand than for NH4+–N with shade during late biofilm colonization. We found no strong diel shift in NH4+–N or NO3−–N demand. Results demonstrate the primacy of light on NH4+–N and NO3−–N removal in streams. Understanding how shading and biofilm colonization alter removal is critical as streams are vulnerable to the impacts of land use change.
期刊介绍:
JGR-Biogeosciences focuses on biogeosciences of the Earth system in the past, present, and future and the extension of this research to planetary studies. The emerging field of biogeosciences spans the intellectual interface between biology and the geosciences and attempts to understand the functions of the Earth system across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Studies in biogeosciences may use multiple lines of evidence drawn from diverse fields to gain a holistic understanding of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems and extreme environments. Specific topics within the scope of the section include process-based theoretical, experimental, and field studies of biogeochemistry, biogeophysics, atmosphere-, land-, and ocean-ecosystem interactions, biomineralization, life in extreme environments, astrobiology, microbial processes, geomicrobiology, and evolutionary geobiology