Confirming the Primacy of Light Controlling Ammonium Removal in Response to Biofilm Colonization and Shade Using Experimental Streams

IF 3.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Anna E. S. Vincent, Jennifer L. Tank, Shannon L. Speir, Elise D. Snyder, Abagael N. Pruitt, Ursula H. Mahl, Robert O. Hall Jr.
{"title":"Confirming the Primacy of Light Controlling Ammonium Removal in Response to Biofilm Colonization and Shade Using Experimental Streams","authors":"Anna E. S. Vincent,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Tank,&nbsp;Shannon L. Speir,&nbsp;Elise D. Snyder,&nbsp;Abagael N. Pruitt,&nbsp;Ursula H. Mahl,&nbsp;Robert O. Hall Jr.","doi":"10.1029/2024JG008259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The removal of riparian shading alters stream biogeochemical cycling by stimulating algal biofilms through the release of light limitation. Few studies have examined the combined effects of shading and biofilm growth on ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N) and nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N) removal in the same experiment. We quantified water column NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N removal using <i>n</i> = 176 short-term additions in four experimental streams over 2 years and assessed the influence of shading (shaded vs. open canopy) and biofilm colonization (early vs. late) on removal using a Bayesian three-level hierarchical model. First, we assessed the roles of biofilm and shade on NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N removal. Shading lowered NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N uptake velocity [<i>V</i><sub><i>f</i></sub>; slope: −0.45 (−0.69, −0.22)], while the effect of biofilm was too small to detect [0.06 (−0.18, 0.29)]. The following season, we compared NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N removal, and added night releases to estimate autotrophic and heterotrophic contributions to removal. Shading reduced NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N <i>V</i><sub><i>f</i></sub>, while the effect of biofilm often depended on shading. NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N <i>V</i><sub><i>f</i></sub> was higher than NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N <i>V</i><sub><i>f</i></sub> by 51% during the day and 38% at night, confirming preferential NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N removal. NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N <i>V</i><sub><i>f</i></sub> declined more between the Late-Open and Late-Shade phases compared to NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N, suggesting a stronger decline in NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N demand than for NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N with shade during late biofilm colonization. We found no strong diel shift in NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N or NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N demand. Results demonstrate the primacy of light on NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>–N removal in streams. Understanding how shading and biofilm colonization alter removal is critical as streams are vulnerable to the impacts of land use change.</p>","PeriodicalId":16003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","volume":"130 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JG008259","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JG008259","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The removal of riparian shading alters stream biogeochemical cycling by stimulating algal biofilms through the release of light limitation. Few studies have examined the combined effects of shading and biofilm growth on ammonium (NH4+–N) and nitrate (NO3–N) removal in the same experiment. We quantified water column NH4+–N and NO3–N removal using n = 176 short-term additions in four experimental streams over 2 years and assessed the influence of shading (shaded vs. open canopy) and biofilm colonization (early vs. late) on removal using a Bayesian three-level hierarchical model. First, we assessed the roles of biofilm and shade on NH4+–N removal. Shading lowered NH4+–N uptake velocity [Vf; slope: −0.45 (−0.69, −0.22)], while the effect of biofilm was too small to detect [0.06 (−0.18, 0.29)]. The following season, we compared NH4+–N and NO3–N removal, and added night releases to estimate autotrophic and heterotrophic contributions to removal. Shading reduced NH4+–N and NO3–N Vf, while the effect of biofilm often depended on shading. NH4+–N Vf was higher than NO3–N Vf by 51% during the day and 38% at night, confirming preferential NH4+–N removal. NO3–N Vf declined more between the Late-Open and Late-Shade phases compared to NH4+–N, suggesting a stronger decline in NO3–N demand than for NH4+–N with shade during late biofilm colonization. We found no strong diel shift in NH4+–N or NO3–N demand. Results demonstrate the primacy of light on NH4+–N and NO3–N removal in streams. Understanding how shading and biofilm colonization alter removal is critical as streams are vulnerable to the impacts of land use change.

Abstract Image

利用实验流确认光控制生物膜定植和遮荫对氨氮去除的首要作用
去除河岸遮荫通过释放光限制刺激藻类生物膜改变溪流生物地球化学循环。很少有研究在同一实验中考察遮荫和生物膜生长对铵态氮(NH4+ -N)和硝态氮(NO3−-N)去除的联合影响。我们在4条实验溪流中使用n = 176短期添加物,在2年内量化了水柱NH4+ -N和NO3−-N的去除,并使用贝叶斯三层分层模型评估了遮荫(遮荫vs开放式树冠)和生物膜定殖(早期vs晚期)对去除的影响。首先,我们评估了生物膜和阴影对NH4+ -N去除的作用。遮荫降低NH4+ -N吸收速率[Vf];斜率:−0.45(−0.69,−0.22)],而生物膜的影响太小而无法检测[0.06(−0.18,0.29)]。接下来的季节,我们比较了NH4+ -N和NO3−-N的去除率,并添加了夜间释放量来估计自养和异养对去除率的贡献。遮荫降低了NH4+ -N和NO3−-N Vf,而生物膜的作用往往依赖于遮荫。NH4+ -N Vf白天比NO3−-N Vf高51%,夜间比NO3−-N Vf高38%,说明NH4+ -N优先去除。与NH4+ -N相比,NO3−-N Vf在开放后期和遮荫后期之间的下降幅度更大,表明在生物膜定植后期,NO3−-N需求的下降幅度大于遮荫后期对NH4+ -N的下降幅度。我们发现对NH4+ -N或NO3−-N的需求没有强烈的日变化。结果表明,光对河流中NH4+ -N和NO3−-N的去除起主要作用。了解遮荫和生物膜定植如何改变迁移是至关重要的,因为溪流容易受到土地利用变化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: JGR-Biogeosciences focuses on biogeosciences of the Earth system in the past, present, and future and the extension of this research to planetary studies. The emerging field of biogeosciences spans the intellectual interface between biology and the geosciences and attempts to understand the functions of the Earth system across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Studies in biogeosciences may use multiple lines of evidence drawn from diverse fields to gain a holistic understanding of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems and extreme environments. Specific topics within the scope of the section include process-based theoretical, experimental, and field studies of biogeochemistry, biogeophysics, atmosphere-, land-, and ocean-ecosystem interactions, biomineralization, life in extreme environments, astrobiology, microbial processes, geomicrobiology, and evolutionary geobiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信