Stronger Evidence of a Subsurface Ocean Within Callisto From a Multifrequency Investigation of Its Induced Magnetic Field

IF 8.3 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
AGU Advances Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1029/2024AV001237
Corey J. Cochrane, Steven D. Vance, Julie C. Castillo-Rogez, Marshall J. Styczinski, Lucas Liuzzo
{"title":"Stronger Evidence of a Subsurface Ocean Within Callisto From a Multifrequency Investigation of Its Induced Magnetic Field","authors":"Corey J. Cochrane,&nbsp;Steven D. Vance,&nbsp;Julie C. Castillo-Rogez,&nbsp;Marshall J. Styczinski,&nbsp;Lucas Liuzzo","doi":"10.1029/2024AV001237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The magnetometer investigation of the Galileo mission used the phenomenon of magnetic induction to produce the most compelling evidence that subsurface oceans exist within our solar system. Although there is high certainty that the induced field measured at Europa is attributed to a global-scale subsurface ocean, there is still uncertainty around the possibility that the induced field measured at Callisto is evidence of an ocean. This uncertainty is due to the presence of a conductive ionosphere, which will also produce an induction signal in response to Jupiter's strong time-varying magnetic field. Therefore, it is not yet known whether the observed induced field is attributable to the ionosphere, an ocean, or a combination of both. In this work, we use previously published simulations of Callisto's plasma interaction in combination with both an inverse and an ensemble forward modeling method to highlight the plausible range of interior properties of Callisto. We further constrain the ocean thickness and conductivity, ice shell thickness, and ionospheric conductivity that are required to explain the Galileo magnetometer observations. This is the first study to jointly consider all flybys to constrain the driving field and three flybys (C03, C09, and C10) to assess the induction response. Our results suggest that Callisto's response more likely arises from the combination of a thick conductive ocean and an ionosphere rather than from an ionosphere alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":100067,"journal":{"name":"AGU Advances","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024AV001237","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AGU Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024AV001237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The magnetometer investigation of the Galileo mission used the phenomenon of magnetic induction to produce the most compelling evidence that subsurface oceans exist within our solar system. Although there is high certainty that the induced field measured at Europa is attributed to a global-scale subsurface ocean, there is still uncertainty around the possibility that the induced field measured at Callisto is evidence of an ocean. This uncertainty is due to the presence of a conductive ionosphere, which will also produce an induction signal in response to Jupiter's strong time-varying magnetic field. Therefore, it is not yet known whether the observed induced field is attributable to the ionosphere, an ocean, or a combination of both. In this work, we use previously published simulations of Callisto's plasma interaction in combination with both an inverse and an ensemble forward modeling method to highlight the plausible range of interior properties of Callisto. We further constrain the ocean thickness and conductivity, ice shell thickness, and ionospheric conductivity that are required to explain the Galileo magnetometer observations. This is the first study to jointly consider all flybys to constrain the driving field and three flybys (C03, C09, and C10) to assess the induction response. Our results suggest that Callisto's response more likely arises from the combination of a thick conductive ocean and an ionosphere rather than from an ionosphere alone.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

从对木卫四感应磁场的多频调查中获得了木卫四地下海洋存在的更有力证据
伽利略号任务的磁力计研究利用磁感应现象得出了太阳系中存在地下海洋的最令人信服的证据。尽管在木卫二上测量到的感应场可以高度肯定地归因于全球尺度的地下海洋,但在木卫四上测量到的感应场是否可能是海洋存在的证据,仍然存在不确定性。这种不确定性是由于导电电离层的存在,电离层也会产生感应信号,以响应木星强大的时变磁场。因此,目前尚不清楚观测到的感应场是归因于电离层、海洋还是两者的结合。在这项工作中,我们使用了先前发表的木卫四等离子体相互作用的模拟,结合了反演和集合正演建模方法,以突出木卫四内部特性的合理范围。我们进一步限制海洋厚度和电导率,冰壳厚度,电离层电导率,这需要解释伽利略磁力计观测。这是第一个联合考虑所有飞掠来约束驱动场和三个飞掠(C03、C09和C10)来评估感应响应的研究。我们的研究结果表明,木卫四的响应更可能是由厚厚的导电海洋和电离层的结合而不是电离层单独产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信