Seismic Safety Evaluation of a Full-Size Reinforced Concrete Frame Infilled With Precast Modular Reinforced Blocks Using Pseudo-Dynamic Testing and Nonlinear Dynamic Finite Element Analysis

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Ju-Seong Jung, Kang-Seok Lee
{"title":"Seismic Safety Evaluation of a Full-Size Reinforced Concrete Frame Infilled With Precast Modular Reinforced Blocks Using Pseudo-Dynamic Testing and Nonlinear Dynamic Finite Element Analysis","authors":"Ju-Seong Jung,&nbsp;Kang-Seok Lee","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study proposes a novel seismic retrofitting method involving a reinforced concrete (R/C) frame infilled with precast modular reinforced blocks (PMRBs) to address the limitations of conventional infilling techniques. The retrofitting system for the R/C frame infilled with PMRB maximizes the advantages of factory-produced modular reinforcement blocks, considerably improving the constructability and joint integrity between the existing frame and the reinforcement, without substantially increasing the structural weight. Moreover, this approach uses a typical frame-infilling method to enhance lateral load capacity, simplifying the calculation of the required amount of seismic reinforcement; thus, it is ideal for R/C buildings with non-seismic detailing dominated by shear failure because it helps secure the necessary strength. A pseudo-dynamic test was conducted using a full-scale two-story frame test specimen, based on an existing R/C building with non-seismic detailing, to verify the restoring force characteristics, strength-increasing effects, reinforcement strain and seismic response control capabilities of the PMRB frame-infilling system. Nonlinear dynamic finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to compare and estimate the results of the pseudo-dynamic test. The study results showed that the average deviation ratio for the seismic response load and displacement between the nonlinear dynamic FEA and the pseudo-dynamic test was approximately 10%, indicating similar outcomes. Under a design basis earthquake of 200 cm/s<sup>2</sup> in seismic intensity, the unreinforced R/C frame experienced shear failure, whereas the PMRB-reinforced frame sustained only minor earthquake damage, even under seismic accelerations of a maximum considered earthquake of 300 cm/s<sup>2</sup> and a large-scale earthquake of 400 cm/s<sup>2</sup>. Thus, the newly developed PMRB frame-infilling system shows great promise for seismic reinforcement.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 2","pages":"724-746"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes a novel seismic retrofitting method involving a reinforced concrete (R/C) frame infilled with precast modular reinforced blocks (PMRBs) to address the limitations of conventional infilling techniques. The retrofitting system for the R/C frame infilled with PMRB maximizes the advantages of factory-produced modular reinforcement blocks, considerably improving the constructability and joint integrity between the existing frame and the reinforcement, without substantially increasing the structural weight. Moreover, this approach uses a typical frame-infilling method to enhance lateral load capacity, simplifying the calculation of the required amount of seismic reinforcement; thus, it is ideal for R/C buildings with non-seismic detailing dominated by shear failure because it helps secure the necessary strength. A pseudo-dynamic test was conducted using a full-scale two-story frame test specimen, based on an existing R/C building with non-seismic detailing, to verify the restoring force characteristics, strength-increasing effects, reinforcement strain and seismic response control capabilities of the PMRB frame-infilling system. Nonlinear dynamic finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to compare and estimate the results of the pseudo-dynamic test. The study results showed that the average deviation ratio for the seismic response load and displacement between the nonlinear dynamic FEA and the pseudo-dynamic test was approximately 10%, indicating similar outcomes. Under a design basis earthquake of 200 cm/s2 in seismic intensity, the unreinforced R/C frame experienced shear failure, whereas the PMRB-reinforced frame sustained only minor earthquake damage, even under seismic accelerations of a maximum considered earthquake of 300 cm/s2 and a large-scale earthquake of 400 cm/s2. Thus, the newly developed PMRB frame-infilling system shows great promise for seismic reinforcement.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信