A. M. Freitas, V. D. Nair, L. E. Sollenberger, W. G. Harris, A. N. Rodriguez
{"title":"Application and residual effects of poultry litter biochar on cropping system yields","authors":"A. M. Freitas, V. D. Nair, L. E. Sollenberger, W. G. Harris, A. N. Rodriguez","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Animal manures such as poultry litter supply plant-available phosphorus (P), but P loss can occur following manure application to crops, particularly in sandy soils. The transformation of poultry litter biochar (PLB) reduces P losses upon application to crops while providing essential plant nutrients. Our objectives were to evaluate: (1) the effects of PLB on crop yields when applied at the same total P rate as inorganic P fertilizer and (2) the residual effect of previous-year PLB and inorganic P fertilization on crop yield at two locations with different soil types (Entisols and Spodosols). Inorganic P, PLB, and no-P treatments were allocated to six replicates of a randomized complete block design at each location. The cropping system was sequential plantings of rye, corn, and sorghum each year for 2 years. The residual effect of P application was quantified in Year 2 when first-year PLB and inorganic P plots were subdivided, with half receiving no additional P and half receiving the same P application as the previous year. After each crop was harvested, crop yield, nitrogen (N) and P levels in plant tissue, and the soil phosphorus storage capacity were determined. PLB supported either similar or significantly greater cumulative biomass yields compared with inorganic P fertilization at the two locations. The effect of residual PLB on yield varied with the location and crop, highlighting the importance of soil type and management practices in optimizing the benefits of this amendment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21745","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Animal manures such as poultry litter supply plant-available phosphorus (P), but P loss can occur following manure application to crops, particularly in sandy soils. The transformation of poultry litter biochar (PLB) reduces P losses upon application to crops while providing essential plant nutrients. Our objectives were to evaluate: (1) the effects of PLB on crop yields when applied at the same total P rate as inorganic P fertilizer and (2) the residual effect of previous-year PLB and inorganic P fertilization on crop yield at two locations with different soil types (Entisols and Spodosols). Inorganic P, PLB, and no-P treatments were allocated to six replicates of a randomized complete block design at each location. The cropping system was sequential plantings of rye, corn, and sorghum each year for 2 years. The residual effect of P application was quantified in Year 2 when first-year PLB and inorganic P plots were subdivided, with half receiving no additional P and half receiving the same P application as the previous year. After each crop was harvested, crop yield, nitrogen (N) and P levels in plant tissue, and the soil phosphorus storage capacity were determined. PLB supported either similar or significantly greater cumulative biomass yields compared with inorganic P fertilization at the two locations. The effect of residual PLB on yield varied with the location and crop, highlighting the importance of soil type and management practices in optimizing the benefits of this amendment.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.