Attachment Style Predicts Emotion Regulation, Help-Seeking, and Recovery in Psychosis

Jacqui Tiller, Tess Maguire, Katherine Newman-Taylor
{"title":"Attachment Style Predicts Emotion Regulation, Help-Seeking, and Recovery in Psychosis","authors":"Jacqui Tiller,&nbsp;Tess Maguire,&nbsp;Katherine Newman-Taylor","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n <p>Untreated psychosis can have a devastating impact on individuals and their families. Recommended therapies are underutilised. Attachment theory provides a framework to understand intra- and interpersonal responses to threat cues, such as voices and paranoia, which affect recovery. This is the first study to test a coherent set of theory-driven predictions about the impact of attachment style on people's ability to manage distress associated with psychosis, and seek help effectively. We used a cross-sectional design to examine the impact of attachment style on emotional regulation, help-seeking intentions, service engagement, and clinical and recovery outcomes in people with psychosis. We recruited a total of 65 participants with psychosis from community and NHS pathways. Participants completed standardized measures of predictor and dependent variables at one-time point. Regression analyses showed that insecure attachment (anxious and avoidant) predicted more use of unhelpful emotional regulation strategies, less help-seeking, and poorer clinical and recovery outcomes, with medium to large effects (<i>p </i>&lt; 0.05). We found no effects for service engagement. Attachment style predicts intra- and interpersonal responses to threat in psychosis, and may partially account for the considerable variation in engagement with recommended therapies, and longer-term outcomes. Routine assessment of attachment at initial service contact would identify people likely to struggle to seek and accept therapeutic interventions, who may in turn benefit from attachment-congruent engagement efforts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.70002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.70002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Untreated psychosis can have a devastating impact on individuals and their families. Recommended therapies are underutilised. Attachment theory provides a framework to understand intra- and interpersonal responses to threat cues, such as voices and paranoia, which affect recovery. This is the first study to test a coherent set of theory-driven predictions about the impact of attachment style on people's ability to manage distress associated with psychosis, and seek help effectively. We used a cross-sectional design to examine the impact of attachment style on emotional regulation, help-seeking intentions, service engagement, and clinical and recovery outcomes in people with psychosis. We recruited a total of 65 participants with psychosis from community and NHS pathways. Participants completed standardized measures of predictor and dependent variables at one-time point. Regression analyses showed that insecure attachment (anxious and avoidant) predicted more use of unhelpful emotional regulation strategies, less help-seeking, and poorer clinical and recovery outcomes, with medium to large effects (p < 0.05). We found no effects for service engagement. Attachment style predicts intra- and interpersonal responses to threat in psychosis, and may partially account for the considerable variation in engagement with recommended therapies, and longer-term outcomes. Routine assessment of attachment at initial service contact would identify people likely to struggle to seek and accept therapeutic interventions, who may in turn benefit from attachment-congruent engagement efforts.

依恋类型预测精神病患者的情绪调节、求助和康复
未经治疗的精神病会对个人及其家庭造成毁灭性的影响。推荐的治疗方法未得到充分利用。依恋理论提供了一个框架来理解内部和人际间对威胁线索的反应,比如影响康复的声音和偏执。这是第一个测试一套连贯的理论驱动预测的研究,这些预测是关于依恋类型对人们处理与精神病相关的痛苦和有效寻求帮助的能力的影响。我们采用横断面设计来检验依恋类型对精神病患者情绪调节、求助意向、服务参与以及临床和康复结果的影响。我们从社区和NHS途径共招募了65名精神病患者。参与者一次性完成预测变量和因变量的标准化测量。回归分析显示,不安全依恋(焦虑型和回避型)预示着更多的使用无益的情绪调节策略,更少的寻求帮助,更差的临床和康复结果,具有中到大的影响(p < 0.05)。我们没有发现服务参与的影响。依恋类型预测了精神病患者对威胁的内部和人际反应,并可能部分解释了推荐疗法的参与程度和长期结果的相当大的差异。在最初的服务接触中对依恋进行常规评估,可以识别出那些可能难以寻求和接受治疗干预的人,他们可能反过来从依恋一致的参与努力中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信