Incorporating soil-structure interaction into simplified numerical models for fragility analysis of RC structures

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Valentina Blasone, Shahin Huseynli, Flavia De Luca, Dimitris Karamitros, Raffaele De Risi, Enrico Spacone
{"title":"Incorporating soil-structure interaction into simplified numerical models for fragility analysis of RC structures","authors":"Valentina Blasone,&nbsp;Shahin Huseynli,&nbsp;Flavia De Luca,&nbsp;Dimitris Karamitros,&nbsp;Raffaele De Risi,&nbsp;Enrico Spacone","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Simplified building models are a valuable option for seismic assessment at the regional scale. These models often use calibrated springs to model column behaviour, and recent advances have made them suitable for capturing torsional response in Reinforced-Concrete Moment-Resisting-Frames. Nevertheless, their validation is typically achieved using fixed-base models, which do not include the influence of soil-structure interaction (SSI). This study introduces a novel approach to quantify the accuracy of a recently developed simplified model while accounting for dynamic SSI, using a newly implemented, refined 3D Finite Element non-linear soil model in OpenSees. The accuracy of the simplified structural model is assessed by comparing the results of non-linear dynamic analyses with those of a refined model in terms of (i) a peak structural demand parameter such as the interstorey-drift ratio and (ii) fragility curves computed from cloud analysis and accounting for collapse cases. The study presents details of the proposed refined approach for 3D soil modelling in OpenSees, focusing on implementing free-field boundary conditions and structure-to-soil connections. Results show that the accuracy of the simplified model is maintained, even in the presence of SSI, and it successfully captures the overall structural response measured at peak demand. For the proposed case study, the difference between the simplified and refined models’ fragility curves’ medians is 4% and 2% for fixed and SSI models, respectively. The simplified structural model, combined with the refined soil model for SSI effects, presents an innovative and conservative, yet computationally efficient, alternative for seismic risk analysis, even in the presence of structural irregularity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 2","pages":"393-412"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eqe.4259","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4259","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Simplified building models are a valuable option for seismic assessment at the regional scale. These models often use calibrated springs to model column behaviour, and recent advances have made them suitable for capturing torsional response in Reinforced-Concrete Moment-Resisting-Frames. Nevertheless, their validation is typically achieved using fixed-base models, which do not include the influence of soil-structure interaction (SSI). This study introduces a novel approach to quantify the accuracy of a recently developed simplified model while accounting for dynamic SSI, using a newly implemented, refined 3D Finite Element non-linear soil model in OpenSees. The accuracy of the simplified structural model is assessed by comparing the results of non-linear dynamic analyses with those of a refined model in terms of (i) a peak structural demand parameter such as the interstorey-drift ratio and (ii) fragility curves computed from cloud analysis and accounting for collapse cases. The study presents details of the proposed refined approach for 3D soil modelling in OpenSees, focusing on implementing free-field boundary conditions and structure-to-soil connections. Results show that the accuracy of the simplified model is maintained, even in the presence of SSI, and it successfully captures the overall structural response measured at peak demand. For the proposed case study, the difference between the simplified and refined models’ fragility curves’ medians is 4% and 2% for fixed and SSI models, respectively. The simplified structural model, combined with the refined soil model for SSI effects, presents an innovative and conservative, yet computationally efficient, alternative for seismic risk analysis, even in the presence of structural irregularity.

Abstract Image

将土-结构相互作用纳入RC结构易损性分析的简化数值模型
简化的建筑模型是在区域尺度上进行地震评估的一个有价值的选择。这些模型通常使用校准弹簧来模拟柱的行为,最近的进展使它们适用于捕获钢筋混凝土抗矩框架的扭转响应。然而,它们的验证通常是使用固定基础模型来实现的,其中不包括土壤-结构相互作用(SSI)的影响。本研究引入了一种新的方法来量化最近开发的简化模型的准确性,同时考虑动态SSI,使用OpenSees中新实现的精细3D有限元非线性土壤模型。通过将非线性动力分析结果与精炼模型的结果进行比较,评估简化结构模型的准确性,其中包括(i)峰值结构需求参数,如层间位移比和(ii)从云分析和考虑倒塌案例计算的易损性曲线。该研究详细介绍了在OpenSees中提出的3D土壤建模的改进方法,重点是实现自由场边界条件和结构与土壤的连接。结果表明,即使在存在SSI的情况下,简化模型的准确性仍然保持不变,并且它成功地捕获了峰值需求时测量的整体结构响应。对于所提出的案例研究,固定模型和SSI模型的简化模型和精炼模型的脆弱性曲线中位数之间的差异分别为4%和2%。简化结构模型与考虑SSI效应的精细化土模型相结合,即使在存在结构不规则性的情况下,也为地震风险分析提供了一种创新、保守但计算效率高的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信