{"title":"Seismic Behavior of a Stone Curtain Wall System With Undercut Bolt Anchorage Under Various Loading Protocols","authors":"Xiaodong Ji, Rongwei Luo, Yuncheng Zhuang, Xiang Gao, Wanhui Lim, Zhe Qu","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper presents full-scale experimental tests on the seismic behavior of a stone curtain wall system with undercut bolt anchorage (SCWS-UBA). Experimental set-ups were developed to test full-scale stone curtain wall systems subjected to three loading protocols: quasi-static in-plane loading, dynamic in-plane loading, and dynamic coupled in-plane and out-of-plane loading. In all three tests, the SCWS-UBA failed due to connector disengagement, followed by fracture of silicone sealant and transom-to-mullion connection welds and, finally, the falling out of stone panels. The SCWS-UBA specimens exhibited a large displacement capacity with an ultimate falling-out drift exceeding 3.0% in all tests. The drift ratio at connector disengagement was almost identical for both quasi-static and dynamic in-plane loading scenarios, indicating that in-plane accelerations had a minimal impact on stone curtain wall failure. In addition, disengagement of the connector was dependent on the horizontal edge distance and vertical overlap depth between the connector and the L-shaped steel angle. Simplified formulas for calculating the horizontal and vertical displacement of the connector were then developed. Based on these, seismic design recommendations were proposed for the overlap depth and edge distance between the connector and L-shaped steel angle, thereby preventing the falling out of stone panels.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 2","pages":"706-723"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper presents full-scale experimental tests on the seismic behavior of a stone curtain wall system with undercut bolt anchorage (SCWS-UBA). Experimental set-ups were developed to test full-scale stone curtain wall systems subjected to three loading protocols: quasi-static in-plane loading, dynamic in-plane loading, and dynamic coupled in-plane and out-of-plane loading. In all three tests, the SCWS-UBA failed due to connector disengagement, followed by fracture of silicone sealant and transom-to-mullion connection welds and, finally, the falling out of stone panels. The SCWS-UBA specimens exhibited a large displacement capacity with an ultimate falling-out drift exceeding 3.0% in all tests. The drift ratio at connector disengagement was almost identical for both quasi-static and dynamic in-plane loading scenarios, indicating that in-plane accelerations had a minimal impact on stone curtain wall failure. In addition, disengagement of the connector was dependent on the horizontal edge distance and vertical overlap depth between the connector and the L-shaped steel angle. Simplified formulas for calculating the horizontal and vertical displacement of the connector were then developed. Based on these, seismic design recommendations were proposed for the overlap depth and edge distance between the connector and L-shaped steel angle, thereby preventing the falling out of stone panels.
期刊介绍:
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following:
ground motions for analysis and design
geotechnical earthquake engineering
probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis
experimental behaviour of structures
seismic protective systems
system identification
risk assessment
seismic code requirements
methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.