Patients with detectable KIT p.D816V in peripheral blood are at high risk for adverse systemic events during venom immunotherapy and treatment failure

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Ajda Demšar Luzar, Jakob Otorepec, Mitja Košnik, Peter Kopač, Julij Šelb, Peter Korošec, Matija Rijavec
{"title":"Patients with detectable KIT p.D816V in peripheral blood are at high risk for adverse systemic events during venom immunotherapy and treatment failure","authors":"Ajda Demšar Luzar,&nbsp;Jakob Otorepec,&nbsp;Mitja Košnik,&nbsp;Peter Kopač,&nbsp;Julij Šelb,&nbsp;Peter Korošec,&nbsp;Matija Rijavec","doi":"10.1002/clt2.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Recent studies have highlighted the importance of routine screening for the somatic missense <i>KIT</i> p.D816V variant in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL), and its association with severe sting anaphylaxis. Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of <i>KIT</i> p.D816V detected in PBL on systemic adverse events (SAEs) and the efficacy of venom immunotherapy (VIT).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included 839 patients receiving VIT. The <i>KIT</i> p.D816V variant was assayed with a highly sensitive, allele-specific, quantitative PCR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p><i>KIT</i> p.D816V was detected in the PBL of 125 (15%) of 839 VIT patients. The majority (70%, 88/125) of these individuals had normal BST levels. Notably, half of the <i>KIT</i>-positive patients receiving honeybee venom immunotherapy had SAEs during treatment (48%, 18/37; <i>p</i> = 0.0136), and the <i>KIT</i> p.D816V allele burden was higher than 0.01% in the majority of those patients (61%, 11/18). Furthermore, a significant difference was observed between <i>KIT</i>-positive and <i>KIT</i>-negative patients treated with VIT in the past and who experienced a recurrent reaction to a sting after treatment termination (VIT failure). <i>KIT</i>-positive patients with VIT failure had a higher allele burden than those with successful VIT (80% vs. 40% with a <i>KIT</i> p.D816V higher than 0.01%; <i>p</i> = 0.0019). <i>KIT</i> p.D816V was a predictor of SAEs during honeybee VIT (univariate; OR = 2.43, <i>p</i> = 0.012/multivariate; OR = 2.26, <i>p</i> = 0.033) and a strong predictor of VIT failure in patients treated with wasp venom (univariate; OR = 4.1, <i>p</i> = 0.002/multivariate; OR = 3.54, <i>p</i> = 0.008).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our study revealed the high clinical relevance of <i>KIT</i> p.D816V detected in PBL. <i>KIT</i> p.D816V was a significant predictor of SAEs during honeybee VIT and a significant predictor of VIT failure after completing wasp VIT.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10334,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clt2.70019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clt2.70019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have highlighted the importance of routine screening for the somatic missense KIT p.D816V variant in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL), and its association with severe sting anaphylaxis. Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of KIT p.D816V detected in PBL on systemic adverse events (SAEs) and the efficacy of venom immunotherapy (VIT).

Methods

This retrospective study included 839 patients receiving VIT. The KIT p.D816V variant was assayed with a highly sensitive, allele-specific, quantitative PCR.

Results

KIT p.D816V was detected in the PBL of 125 (15%) of 839 VIT patients. The majority (70%, 88/125) of these individuals had normal BST levels. Notably, half of the KIT-positive patients receiving honeybee venom immunotherapy had SAEs during treatment (48%, 18/37; p = 0.0136), and the KIT p.D816V allele burden was higher than 0.01% in the majority of those patients (61%, 11/18). Furthermore, a significant difference was observed between KIT-positive and KIT-negative patients treated with VIT in the past and who experienced a recurrent reaction to a sting after treatment termination (VIT failure). KIT-positive patients with VIT failure had a higher allele burden than those with successful VIT (80% vs. 40% with a KIT p.D816V higher than 0.01%; p = 0.0019). KIT p.D816V was a predictor of SAEs during honeybee VIT (univariate; OR = 2.43, p = 0.012/multivariate; OR = 2.26, p = 0.033) and a strong predictor of VIT failure in patients treated with wasp venom (univariate; OR = 4.1, p = 0.002/multivariate; OR = 3.54, p = 0.008).

Conclusion

Our study revealed the high clinical relevance of KIT p.D816V detected in PBL. KIT p.D816V was a significant predictor of SAEs during honeybee VIT and a significant predictor of VIT failure after completing wasp VIT.

Abstract Image

外周血检测到KIT p.D816V的患者在毒液免疫治疗过程中发生全身不良事件和治疗失败的风险很高
最近的研究强调了常规筛查外周血白细胞(PBL)体细胞错义KIT p.D816V变异的重要性,以及它与严重刺痛过敏反应的关系。本研究旨在评价PBL检测KIT p.D816V与全身不良事件(sae)及毒液免疫治疗(VIT)疗效的临床相关性。方法对839例VIT患者进行回顾性研究。采用高度敏感的等位基因特异性定量PCR检测KIT p.D816V变异。结果839例VIT患者的PBL中检测到KIT p.D816V 125例(15%)。大多数(70%,88/125)患者BST水平正常。值得注意的是,接受蜂毒免疫治疗的kit阳性患者中有一半在治疗期间发生了SAEs (48%, 18/37;p = 0.0136),大多数患者的KIT p. d816v等位基因负担高于0.01%(61%,11/18)。此外,在过去接受过VIT治疗的kit阳性和kit阴性患者以及在治疗结束后再次出现刺痛反应(VIT失败)的患者之间观察到显著差异。KIT阳性的VIT失败患者的等位基因负担高于VIT成功患者(80% vs 40%, KIT p.D816V高于0.01%;p = 0.0019)。KIT p.D816V是蜜蜂VIT期间SAEs的预测因子(单变量;OR = 2.43, p = 0.012/多变量;OR = 2.26, p = 0.033)和黄蜂毒液治疗患者VIT衰竭的强预测因子(单变量;OR = 4.1, p = 0.002/多变量;OR = 3.54, p = 0.008)。结论KIT p.D816V在PBL中检测具有较高的临床相关性。KIT p.D816V是蜜蜂VIT期间SAEs的显著预测因子,也是黄蜂完成VIT后VIT失败的显著预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Allergy
Clinical and Translational Allergy Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Allergy, one of several journals in the portfolio of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy research and reviews, as well as EAACI position papers, task force reports and guidelines, amongst an international scientific audience. Clinical and Translational Allergy accepts clinical and translational research in the following areas and other related topics: asthma, rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic conjunctivitis, allergic skin diseases, atopic eczema, urticaria, angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis, food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, animal models of allergic disease, immune mechanisms, or any other topic related to allergic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信