Contributions to Systems Software and Service Process Improvement and Innovation Based on Recent Advances

IF 1.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Ricardo Colomo-Palacios, Richard Messnarz, Miklós Biró
{"title":"Contributions to Systems Software and Service Process Improvement and Innovation Based on Recent Advances","authors":"Ricardo Colomo-Palacios,&nbsp;Richard Messnarz,&nbsp;Miklós Biró","doi":"10.1002/smr.2737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This special issue comprises a selected set of high quality and extended articles of the 29th Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI) Conference, held in 2022 in Salzburg, Austria.</p><p>Conferences were held in Dublin (Ireland) in 1994, in Vienna (Austria) in 1995, in Brighton (UK) in 1996, in Budapest (Hungary) in 1997, in Gothenburg (Sweden) in 1998, in Pori (Finland) in 1999, in Copenhagen (Denmark) in 2000, in Limerick (Ireland) in 2001, in Nuremberg (Germany) in 2002, in Graz (Austria) in 2003, in Trondheim (Norway) in 2004, in Budapest (Hungary) in 2005, in Joensuu (Finland) in 2006, in Potsdam (Germany) in 2007, in Dublin (Ireland) in 2008, in Alcala (Spain) in 2009, in Grenoble (France) in 2010, in Roskilde (Denmark) in 2011, in Vienna (Austria) in 2012, in Dundalk (Ireland) in 2013, in Luxembourg in 2014, in Ankara (Turkey) in 2015, in Graz (Austria) in 2016, in Ostrava (Czech Republic) in 2017, in Bilbao (Spain) in 2018, in Edinburgh (UK) in 2019, in Düsseldorf (Germany) in 2020, in Krems (Austria) in 2021, and in Salzburg (Austria) in 2022.</p><p>EuroSPI had a cooperation with the EU Blueprint for Automotive project DRIVES [<span>1</span>] (2018–2022) where leading Automotive industry discusses and presents skills for the Europe 2030 strategy in the automotive sector. In 2022, the ASA (Automotive Skills Alliance) has been formed in Brussels which continues with the DRIVES results, and EuroSPI is a partner in the ASA.</p><p>EuroSPI has a cooperation with the EU Blueprint for Batteries project ALBATTS (2020–2023) where leading European industry discusses and establishes a skills agenda to build a European battery production capability for the electrification of European e-mobility.</p><p>EuroSPI has a cooperation with the EU project FLAMENCO [<span>2</span>] (2023–2024) where for the Working Group 3.6 for IT in Automotive, the certification and training services for job roles in European automotive industry will be developed.</p><p>EuroSPI has established the SPI Manifesto (SPI = Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement [<span>3</span>]), a set of social media groups including a selection of presentations and key notes freely available on YouTube and access to job role-based qualification through the European Certification and Qualification Association (www.ecqa.org).</p><p>A typical characterization of EuroSPI is reflected in a statement made by a company: “… the biggest value of EuroSPI lies in its function as a European knowledge and experience exchange mechanism for SPI and innovation.”</p><p>Since its beginning in 1994 in Dublin, the EuroSPI initiative continuously develops the term SPI including more and more fields that contribute. During the years, new communities (Cybersecurity, Internet of Things, Agile, etc …) joined and the term EuroSPI<sup>2</sup> became European System, Software, Service, Safety, and Security Process, Product, Programming Improvement, Innovation, and Infrastructure. So in fact, it became EuroS<sup>5</sup>P<sup>3</sup>I<sup>3</sup>.</p><p>EuroSPI 2022 took place in Salzburg, Austria. Six of the set of papers presented in the conference were selected by the editors for expansion in this special issue. The choice of the different manuscripts was made with consideration of the comments provided by the reviewers, and the final set was chosen based on the novelty and contribution of the papers. The editors present the selected manuscripts and discuss their content in what follows.</p><p>The paper “Trustworthy and Collaborative Traceability Management: Experts' Feedback on a Blockchain-enabled Framework” by Demi, Sánchez-Gordón, Kristiensen and Larrucea presents a study based on the use of blockchain technology to register and track software artifacts of any type and size, in a decentralized, yet secure manner. The study, by means of a set of semi-structured interviews, is aimed at identifying challenges, benefits, and potential improvements of a previous framework and blockchain prototype by means of feedback collected from a set of software engineering experts. The findings suggest an overall favorable outlook by Experts regarding the blockchain-enabled requirements traceability framework and prototype. While the presence of blockchain technologies in software engineering is nowadays beginning to mature [<span>4</span>], the application of these technologies in requirements engineering is more scarce (see [<span>5-7</span>]). In this paper, adoption factors are taken into account to improve framework usability and contribution.</p><p>In “Product and Service Quality Risks – a survey about evolution and application in different business domains to facilitate Quality Engineering” by Alexander Poth, the author examines the literature regarding quality risk approaches identifying mature and general product and service risk approaches that are applicable in a variety of contexts. In the manuscript, Poth proposes an approach, describing its methodical evolution and how it can be integrated into development procedures, including soft-skills development such as employee awareness and systematic training within organizations. A case study in the Group IT of the Volkswagen AG is presented. Quality engineering is key in software process improvement initiatives [<span>8</span>], and this importance is even higher when initiatives focus on the sociocultural dimension of improvement duties [<span>9, 10</span>]. In the paper by Poth, the author underlines the importance of the development of employee awareness and systematic training within organizations.</p><p>“Promoting Social and Human Factors through a Gamified Automotive Software Development Environment” is authored by Gloria Piedad Gasca-Hurtado, Mirna Muñoz, and Samer Sameh. This paper presents an analysis from the point of view of developing software-controlled systems in automobiles. Authors employ a deductive approach to examine the design aspects of a strategy created and implemented in a software development automotive environment. One of the most significant findings of this study is the strategy's capacity to promote social and human factors, which encompasses motivation, commitment, team cohesion, emotional intelligence, and autonomy. It is recommended that the aforementioned considerations be taken into account in order to enhance the productivity of the teams in question. Gamification has been quite popular in Software Engineering education and training [<span>11-13</span>]; the presence of gamification initiatives in software industry is less frequent (e.g., [<span>14</span>]). In this paper, authors focus on the use of Gamification approaches in Automotive Software Development.</p><p>Alexander Poth and Pegah Momen from Volkswagen AG are the authors of the paper entitled “Sustainable Software Engineering – a contribution puzzle of different teams in large IT organizations”. In this industrial paper, authors identify and evaluate the contributions of typical teams in relation to their role in the development of sustainable software engineering solutions. The evaluation encompasses the full software engineering lifecycle, including demand analysis, architectural design, user interface design, implementation, operation, and usage. As organizations cover nowadays a broader focus than just software, the term “sustainable IT engineering” better reflects the scope of the organization's sustainability objectives. The proposed approaches are presented as instantiations within the Volkswagen Group IT. Started back in 2015 in the Karlskrona Manifesto [<span>15</span>], in recent times, the topic has evolved to expand in different dimensions such as ecological, technical, economic, social, and individual [<span>16</span>]. This paper is a prolongation of a set of initiatives on Sustainable Software Engineering focusing the endeavors in the case of the manuscript on key functions and processes and their instantiation within IT organizations.</p><p>In the paper “The PIM.3 Process Improvement Process – Part of the iNTACS Certified Process Expert Training”, Richard Messnarz, Vesna Djordjevic, Viktor Grémen, Winifred Menezes, Ahmed Alborae, Rainer Dreves, So Norimatsu, Thomas Wegner, and Bernhard Sechser document the results of the PIM.3 (Process Improvement Management) working group in INTACS (International Assessor Certification Schema) supported by the VDA-QMC (Verband der Deutschen Automobilindustrie/German Automotive Association – Quality Management Center). The new INTACS training is being launched by October 1, 2024 and rolled out worldwide. The process expert training is an integrated part of it, and the PIM.3 process training represents a session of the process expert training. This paper publishes the results of the PIM.3 process improvement management team of the INTACS working group for developing the process expert course.</p><p>The final paper is “Towards an Ontology for Process Compliance with the (Machinery) Legislations” and is authored by Barbara Gallina, Gergo László Steierhoffer, Thomas Young Olesen, Eszter Parajdi, and Mike Aarup. In this work, Gallina et al. focus on knowledge management for process compliance and propose a preliminary structured ontology. The objective of this ontology is to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the cognitive complexity inherent in the compliance problem, particularly in instances where knowledge-driven organizational structures, which may be geographically distributed and/or characterized by significant heterogeneity, are involved in communication. Compliance is one of the hot topics in almost all industries, and software industry is not an exemption [<span>17</span>]. In the case of “Towards an Ontology for Process Compliance with the (Machinery) Legislations”, authors focus on aspects like cognitive complexity tackling the problem by means of the design of an Ontology.</p>","PeriodicalId":48898,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/smr.2737","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smr.2737","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special issue comprises a selected set of high quality and extended articles of the 29th Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI) Conference, held in 2022 in Salzburg, Austria.

Conferences were held in Dublin (Ireland) in 1994, in Vienna (Austria) in 1995, in Brighton (UK) in 1996, in Budapest (Hungary) in 1997, in Gothenburg (Sweden) in 1998, in Pori (Finland) in 1999, in Copenhagen (Denmark) in 2000, in Limerick (Ireland) in 2001, in Nuremberg (Germany) in 2002, in Graz (Austria) in 2003, in Trondheim (Norway) in 2004, in Budapest (Hungary) in 2005, in Joensuu (Finland) in 2006, in Potsdam (Germany) in 2007, in Dublin (Ireland) in 2008, in Alcala (Spain) in 2009, in Grenoble (France) in 2010, in Roskilde (Denmark) in 2011, in Vienna (Austria) in 2012, in Dundalk (Ireland) in 2013, in Luxembourg in 2014, in Ankara (Turkey) in 2015, in Graz (Austria) in 2016, in Ostrava (Czech Republic) in 2017, in Bilbao (Spain) in 2018, in Edinburgh (UK) in 2019, in Düsseldorf (Germany) in 2020, in Krems (Austria) in 2021, and in Salzburg (Austria) in 2022.

EuroSPI had a cooperation with the EU Blueprint for Automotive project DRIVES [1] (2018–2022) where leading Automotive industry discusses and presents skills for the Europe 2030 strategy in the automotive sector. In 2022, the ASA (Automotive Skills Alliance) has been formed in Brussels which continues with the DRIVES results, and EuroSPI is a partner in the ASA.

EuroSPI has a cooperation with the EU Blueprint for Batteries project ALBATTS (2020–2023) where leading European industry discusses and establishes a skills agenda to build a European battery production capability for the electrification of European e-mobility.

EuroSPI has a cooperation with the EU project FLAMENCO [2] (2023–2024) where for the Working Group 3.6 for IT in Automotive, the certification and training services for job roles in European automotive industry will be developed.

EuroSPI has established the SPI Manifesto (SPI = Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement [3]), a set of social media groups including a selection of presentations and key notes freely available on YouTube and access to job role-based qualification through the European Certification and Qualification Association (www.ecqa.org).

A typical characterization of EuroSPI is reflected in a statement made by a company: “… the biggest value of EuroSPI lies in its function as a European knowledge and experience exchange mechanism for SPI and innovation.”

Since its beginning in 1994 in Dublin, the EuroSPI initiative continuously develops the term SPI including more and more fields that contribute. During the years, new communities (Cybersecurity, Internet of Things, Agile, etc …) joined and the term EuroSPI2 became European System, Software, Service, Safety, and Security Process, Product, Programming Improvement, Innovation, and Infrastructure. So in fact, it became EuroS5P3I3.

EuroSPI 2022 took place in Salzburg, Austria. Six of the set of papers presented in the conference were selected by the editors for expansion in this special issue. The choice of the different manuscripts was made with consideration of the comments provided by the reviewers, and the final set was chosen based on the novelty and contribution of the papers. The editors present the selected manuscripts and discuss their content in what follows.

The paper “Trustworthy and Collaborative Traceability Management: Experts' Feedback on a Blockchain-enabled Framework” by Demi, Sánchez-Gordón, Kristiensen and Larrucea presents a study based on the use of blockchain technology to register and track software artifacts of any type and size, in a decentralized, yet secure manner. The study, by means of a set of semi-structured interviews, is aimed at identifying challenges, benefits, and potential improvements of a previous framework and blockchain prototype by means of feedback collected from a set of software engineering experts. The findings suggest an overall favorable outlook by Experts regarding the blockchain-enabled requirements traceability framework and prototype. While the presence of blockchain technologies in software engineering is nowadays beginning to mature [4], the application of these technologies in requirements engineering is more scarce (see [5-7]). In this paper, adoption factors are taken into account to improve framework usability and contribution.

In “Product and Service Quality Risks – a survey about evolution and application in different business domains to facilitate Quality Engineering” by Alexander Poth, the author examines the literature regarding quality risk approaches identifying mature and general product and service risk approaches that are applicable in a variety of contexts. In the manuscript, Poth proposes an approach, describing its methodical evolution and how it can be integrated into development procedures, including soft-skills development such as employee awareness and systematic training within organizations. A case study in the Group IT of the Volkswagen AG is presented. Quality engineering is key in software process improvement initiatives [8], and this importance is even higher when initiatives focus on the sociocultural dimension of improvement duties [9, 10]. In the paper by Poth, the author underlines the importance of the development of employee awareness and systematic training within organizations.

“Promoting Social and Human Factors through a Gamified Automotive Software Development Environment” is authored by Gloria Piedad Gasca-Hurtado, Mirna Muñoz, and Samer Sameh. This paper presents an analysis from the point of view of developing software-controlled systems in automobiles. Authors employ a deductive approach to examine the design aspects of a strategy created and implemented in a software development automotive environment. One of the most significant findings of this study is the strategy's capacity to promote social and human factors, which encompasses motivation, commitment, team cohesion, emotional intelligence, and autonomy. It is recommended that the aforementioned considerations be taken into account in order to enhance the productivity of the teams in question. Gamification has been quite popular in Software Engineering education and training [11-13]; the presence of gamification initiatives in software industry is less frequent (e.g., [14]). In this paper, authors focus on the use of Gamification approaches in Automotive Software Development.

Alexander Poth and Pegah Momen from Volkswagen AG are the authors of the paper entitled “Sustainable Software Engineering – a contribution puzzle of different teams in large IT organizations”. In this industrial paper, authors identify and evaluate the contributions of typical teams in relation to their role in the development of sustainable software engineering solutions. The evaluation encompasses the full software engineering lifecycle, including demand analysis, architectural design, user interface design, implementation, operation, and usage. As organizations cover nowadays a broader focus than just software, the term “sustainable IT engineering” better reflects the scope of the organization's sustainability objectives. The proposed approaches are presented as instantiations within the Volkswagen Group IT. Started back in 2015 in the Karlskrona Manifesto [15], in recent times, the topic has evolved to expand in different dimensions such as ecological, technical, economic, social, and individual [16]. This paper is a prolongation of a set of initiatives on Sustainable Software Engineering focusing the endeavors in the case of the manuscript on key functions and processes and their instantiation within IT organizations.

In the paper “The PIM.3 Process Improvement Process – Part of the iNTACS Certified Process Expert Training”, Richard Messnarz, Vesna Djordjevic, Viktor Grémen, Winifred Menezes, Ahmed Alborae, Rainer Dreves, So Norimatsu, Thomas Wegner, and Bernhard Sechser document the results of the PIM.3 (Process Improvement Management) working group in INTACS (International Assessor Certification Schema) supported by the VDA-QMC (Verband der Deutschen Automobilindustrie/German Automotive Association – Quality Management Center). The new INTACS training is being launched by October 1, 2024 and rolled out worldwide. The process expert training is an integrated part of it, and the PIM.3 process training represents a session of the process expert training. This paper publishes the results of the PIM.3 process improvement management team of the INTACS working group for developing the process expert course.

The final paper is “Towards an Ontology for Process Compliance with the (Machinery) Legislations” and is authored by Barbara Gallina, Gergo László Steierhoffer, Thomas Young Olesen, Eszter Parajdi, and Mike Aarup. In this work, Gallina et al. focus on knowledge management for process compliance and propose a preliminary structured ontology. The objective of this ontology is to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the cognitive complexity inherent in the compliance problem, particularly in instances where knowledge-driven organizational structures, which may be geographically distributed and/or characterized by significant heterogeneity, are involved in communication. Compliance is one of the hot topics in almost all industries, and software industry is not an exemption [17]. In the case of “Towards an Ontology for Process Compliance with the (Machinery) Legislations”, authors focus on aspects like cognitive complexity tackling the problem by means of the design of an Ontology.

基于最新进展对系统软件和服务过程改进和创新的贡献
本期特刊包括2022年在奥地利萨尔茨堡举行的第29届系统,软件和服务过程改进(EuroSPI)会议的一组精选的高质量和扩展文章。会议举行在都柏林(爱尔兰)在1994年,1995年在维也纳(奥地利),在布赖顿(英国)在1996年,1997年在布达佩斯(匈牙利),哥德堡(瑞典)于1998年在波里(芬兰)在1999年,2000年在哥本哈根(丹麦),2001年在利默里克(爱尔兰),在2002年纽伦堡(德国),2003年在格拉茨(奥地利),在特隆赫姆(挪威)在2004年,2005年在布达佩斯(匈牙利),在Joensuu(芬兰)2006年,在波茨坦(德国)在2007年,2008年在都柏林(爱尔兰),在Alcala(西班牙)在2009年,2010年格勒诺布尔(法国)、2011年罗斯基勒(丹麦)、2012年维也纳(奥地利)、2013年敦多克(爱尔兰)、2014年卢森堡、2015年安卡拉(土耳其)、2016年格拉茨(奥地利)、2017年俄斯特拉发(捷克共和国)、2018年毕尔巴鄂(西班牙)、2019年爱丁堡(英国)、2020年杜塞尔多夫(德国)、2021年克雷姆斯(奥地利)、2022年萨尔茨堡(奥地利)。EuroSPI与欧盟汽车蓝图项目DRIVES[1](2018-2022)合作,在该项目中,领先的汽车行业讨论并展示了欧洲汽车行业2030战略的技能。2022年,ASA(汽车技能联盟)在布鲁塞尔成立,延续了DRIVES的成果,EuroSPI是ASA的合作伙伴。EuroSPI与欧盟电池蓝图项目ALBATTS(2020-2023)合作,欧洲领先的行业讨论并建立了技能议程,以建立欧洲电池生产能力,实现欧洲电动汽车的电气化。EuroSPI与欧盟项目FLAMENCO[2](2023-2024)合作,其中3.6汽车IT工作组将开发欧洲汽车行业工作角色的认证和培训服务。EuroSPI建立了SPI宣言(SPI =系统、软件和服务过程改进[3]),这是一组社交媒体组,包括YouTube上免费提供的精选演讲和关键说明,并可通过欧洲认证和资格认证协会(www.ecqa.org)获得基于工作角色的资格。EuroSPI的典型特征反映在一家公司的声明中:“……EuroSPI的最大价值在于它作为欧洲SPI和创新的知识和经验交流机制的功能。”自1994年在都柏林开始以来,EuroSPI倡议不断发展SPI一词,包括越来越多的领域。多年来,新的社区(网络安全、物联网、敏捷等)加入,EuroSPI2这个术语变成了欧洲系统、软件、服务、安全和安全过程、产品、编程改进、创新和基础设施。实际上,它变成了EuroS5P3I3。EuroSPI 2022在奥地利萨尔茨堡举行。在会议上发表的一组论文中,有六篇被编辑们挑选出来在本期特刊中进行扩充。不同稿件的选择是根据审稿人提供的意见进行的,最终根据论文的新颖性和贡献来选择。编辑们展示了精选的手稿,并在下面讨论了它们的内容。Demi, Sánchez-Gordón, Kristiensen和Larrucea撰写的论文“可信和协作可追溯性管理:专家对区块链支持框架的反馈”提出了一项基于使用区块链技术的研究,以分散但安全的方式注册和跟踪任何类型和大小的软件工件。这项研究通过一组半结构化的访谈,旨在通过从一组软件工程专家那里收集的反馈来确定以前的框架和区块链原型的挑战、好处和潜在改进。研究结果表明,专家们对支持区块链的需求可追溯性框架和原型的整体前景持乐观态度。虽然现在软件工程中区块链技术的出现已经开始趋于成熟,但这些技术在需求工程中的应用却很少(参见[5-7])。本文考虑了采用因素,以提高框架的可用性和贡献。在Alexander Poth的“产品和服务质量风险——关于不同业务领域的发展和应用以促进质量工程的调查”中,作者检查了关于质量风险方法的文献,确定了适用于各种环境的成熟和通用的产品和服务风险方法。在手稿中,Poth提出了一种方法,描述了它的系统演变,以及如何将其集成到开发过程中,包括软技能开发,如员工意识和组织内的系统培训。 介绍了大众汽车集团IT的一个案例研究。质量工程是软件过程改进计划[8]的关键,当计划关注改进职责的社会文化维度时,其重要性甚至更高[9,10]。在Poth的论文中,作者强调了组织内部员工意识发展和系统培训的重要性。“通过游戏化的汽车软件开发环境促进社会和人为因素”由Gloria Piedad Gasca-Hurtado, Mirna Muñoz和Samer Sameh撰写。本文从开发汽车软件控制系统的角度进行了分析。作者采用演绎方法来检查在软件开发汽车环境中创建和实现的策略的设计方面。本研究最重要的发现之一是战略能够促进社会和人为因素,包括动机、承诺、团队凝聚力、情商和自主性。建议考虑到上述因素,以便提高有关小组的生产力。游戏化在软件工程教育和培训中非常流行[11-13];游戏化计划在软件行业的出现频率较低(例如b[14])。在本文中,作者着重于游戏化方法在汽车软件开发中的应用。来自大众汽车公司的Alexander Poth和Pegah Momen是题为“可持续软件工程——大型IT组织中不同团队的贡献难题”的论文的作者。在这篇工业论文中,作者识别并评估了典型团队在可持续软件工程解决方案开发中的作用。评估包含了完整的软件工程生命周期,包括需求分析、架构设计、用户界面设计、实现、操作和使用。由于组织现在所关注的不仅仅是软件,因此术语“可持续IT工程”更好地反映了组织的可持续性目标的范围。建议的方法在大众集团IT中作为实例呈现。从2015年的《卡尔斯克鲁纳宣言》(Karlskrona Manifesto)开始,近年来,这个话题已经发展到生态、技术、经济、社会和个人等不同维度。这篇论文是关于可持续软件工程的一组计划的延伸,其重点是手稿中关于关键功能和过程及其在IT组织中的实例化的努力。在论文“PIM.3过程改进过程- iNTACS认证过程专家培训的一部分”中,Richard Messnarz, Vesna Djordjevic, Viktor gracimmen, Winifred Menezes, Ahmed Alborae, Rainer Dreves, So Norimatsu, Thomas Wegner,和Bernhard Sechser记录了由VDA-QMC(德国汽车工业协会/德国汽车协会-质量管理中心)支持的INTACS(国际评审员认证方案)中PIM.3(过程改进管理)工作组的结果。新的INTACS培训将于2024年10月1日启动,并在全球范围内推广。过程专家培训是过程专家培训的一个组成部分,PIM.3过程培训代表了过程专家培训的一个环节。本文发表了INTACS工作组的PIM.3过程改进管理小组为开发过程专家课程所取得的成果。最后一篇论文是“迈向符合(机械)法规的过程遵从本体论”,由Barbara Gallina、Gergo László Steierhoffer、Thomas Young Olesen、Eszter Parajdi和Mike Aarup撰写。在这项工作中,Gallina等人专注于流程遵从性的知识管理,并提出了一个初步的结构化本体。这个本体论的目标是实现对遵从性问题中固有的认知复杂性的全面理解,特别是在知识驱动的组织结构的情况下,这种组织结构可能在地理上分布和/或以显著的异质性为特征,涉及到沟通。法规遵从性是几乎所有行业的热门话题之一,软件行业也不例外。在“迈向符合(机器)法规的过程本体”的案例中,作者关注的是通过本体设计来解决问题的认知复杂性等方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Software-Evolution and Process
Journal of Software-Evolution and Process COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING-
自引率
10.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信