A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Surface Soil Wetness and Its Uncertainty Analysis Over the Tel River Basin, India

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sovan Sankalp, Bibhuti Bhusan Sahoo, Sushindra Kumar Gupta, Mani Bhushan, Rajib Kumar Majhi, Santosh DT
{"title":"A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Surface Soil Wetness and Its Uncertainty Analysis Over the Tel River Basin, India","authors":"Sovan Sankalp,&nbsp;Bibhuti Bhusan Sahoo,&nbsp;Sushindra Kumar Gupta,&nbsp;Mani Bhushan,&nbsp;Rajib Kumar Majhi,&nbsp;Santosh DT","doi":"10.1002/clen.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Surface soil moisture (SSM) refers to the capacity of the top layer of soil to hold moisture. It is an essential part of the budget for surface water. Soil moisture monitoring is crucial to reduce the effects of precipitation deficits and determine the best ways to manage natural ecosystems in the face of climate change. The current study collected daily SSW data from MERRA-2 for the Tel River Basin in Odisha, India, from 2001 to 2020 with a spatial resolution of 0.5° × 0.625°. To forecast SSW time series (SSWTS) one step ahead, this study examines the reliability of three deep learning (DL) models: gated recurrent unit (GRU), long short-term memory (LSTM), and simple recurrent neural network (simpleRNN). This study aims to address the following research questions: (1) How accurately can DL models predict SSWTS? (2) Which DL model—GRU, LSTM, or simpleRNN—is the most reliable for SSW forecasting? (3) How can the uncertainty in the predicted SSW be quantified and analyzed? Further, in an uncertainty investigation on SSW projected values, a Wilson score technique was employed to evaluate the uncertainty of the DL methods. GRU has outdone the other two models in forecasting monthly SSW with a 12-lookback timestep with a lower error for all the stations. The model appeared more accurate as it declined in gradient on larger sequencing samples. GRU's ability to remember significant prior knowledge, whereas discarding irrelevant data may assist in finding a novel, dependable solution for SSWTS forecasting.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10306,"journal":{"name":"Clean-soil Air Water","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clean-soil Air Water","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clen.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surface soil moisture (SSM) refers to the capacity of the top layer of soil to hold moisture. It is an essential part of the budget for surface water. Soil moisture monitoring is crucial to reduce the effects of precipitation deficits and determine the best ways to manage natural ecosystems in the face of climate change. The current study collected daily SSW data from MERRA-2 for the Tel River Basin in Odisha, India, from 2001 to 2020 with a spatial resolution of 0.5° × 0.625°. To forecast SSW time series (SSWTS) one step ahead, this study examines the reliability of three deep learning (DL) models: gated recurrent unit (GRU), long short-term memory (LSTM), and simple recurrent neural network (simpleRNN). This study aims to address the following research questions: (1) How accurately can DL models predict SSWTS? (2) Which DL model—GRU, LSTM, or simpleRNN—is the most reliable for SSW forecasting? (3) How can the uncertainty in the predicted SSW be quantified and analyzed? Further, in an uncertainty investigation on SSW projected values, a Wilson score technique was employed to evaluate the uncertainty of the DL methods. GRU has outdone the other two models in forecasting monthly SSW with a 12-lookback timestep with a lower error for all the stations. The model appeared more accurate as it declined in gradient on larger sequencing samples. GRU's ability to remember significant prior knowledge, whereas discarding irrelevant data may assist in finding a novel, dependable solution for SSWTS forecasting.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clean-soil Air Water
Clean-soil Air Water 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
88
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: CLEAN covers all aspects of Sustainability and Environmental Safety. The journal focuses on organ/human--environment interactions giving interdisciplinary insights on a broad range of topics including air pollution, waste management, the water cycle, and environmental conservation. With a 2019 Journal Impact Factor of 1.603 (Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2020), the journal publishes an attractive mixture of peer-reviewed scientific reviews, research papers, and short communications. Papers dealing with environmental sustainability issues from such fields as agriculture, biological sciences, energy, food sciences, geography, geology, meteorology, nutrition, soil and water sciences, etc., are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信