Ratio Bias Across Cultures and Disciplines: How Academic Background Shapes Statistical Decision-Making

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Jochen Baumeister, Bernhard Streicher, Eva Lermer
{"title":"Ratio Bias Across Cultures and Disciplines: How Academic Background Shapes Statistical Decision-Making","authors":"Jochen Baumeister,&nbsp;Bernhard Streicher,&nbsp;Eva Lermer","doi":"10.1002/bdm.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ratios are an instrumental component of the communication of probabilities such as COVID incidence rates, side effects of medical drugs, or political decision-making; hence, they are a critical component of an individual's statistical decision-making. Research on the ratio bias has shown inconsistent results based on six major shortcomings which we surmount by replicating an identical experiment with students in Germany, Turkey, and Italy, with a <b>physical</b>, textual, and graphical depiction, and accounting for different levels of exposure to probabilities. In six studies (<i>N</i> = 1338), we show that lower exposure to probabilities leads to significantly more ratio bias–conform choices. The results also suggest that higher levels of statistical numeracy and risk literacy reduce ratio bias–conform choices. Our contribution helps to better understand the ratio bias concerning different populations and highlights different baselines for ratio bias–conform choices among subgroups in the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bdm.70010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdm.70010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ratios are an instrumental component of the communication of probabilities such as COVID incidence rates, side effects of medical drugs, or political decision-making; hence, they are a critical component of an individual's statistical decision-making. Research on the ratio bias has shown inconsistent results based on six major shortcomings which we surmount by replicating an identical experiment with students in Germany, Turkey, and Italy, with a physical, textual, and graphical depiction, and accounting for different levels of exposure to probabilities. In six studies (N = 1338), we show that lower exposure to probabilities leads to significantly more ratio bias–conform choices. The results also suggest that higher levels of statistical numeracy and risk literacy reduce ratio bias–conform choices. Our contribution helps to better understand the ratio bias concerning different populations and highlights different baselines for ratio bias–conform choices among subgroups in the population.

跨文化和学科的比例偏差:学术背景如何影响统计决策
比率是传达诸如COVID发病率、医疗药物副作用或政治决策等概率的重要组成部分;因此,它们是个人统计决策的关键组成部分。对比例偏差的研究表明,基于六个主要缺陷,我们通过对德国、土耳其和意大利的学生进行相同的实验,用物理、文字和图形描述,并考虑不同程度的概率暴露,克服了这些缺陷。在6项研究中(N = 1338),我们发现较低的概率暴露会导致更多符合比例偏差的选择。结果还表明,较高水平的统计计算能力和风险识字率降低了比例偏差符合的选择。我们的贡献有助于更好地理解不同人群的比例偏差,并强调了人群中亚组中符合比例偏差选择的不同基线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Decision Making is a multidisciplinary journal with a broad base of content and style. It publishes original empirical reports, critical review papers, theoretical analyses and methodological contributions. The Journal also features book, software and decision aiding technique reviews, abstracts of important articles published elsewhere and teaching suggestions. The objective of the Journal is to present and stimulate behavioral research on decision making and to provide a forum for the evaluation of complementary, contrasting and conflicting perspectives. These perspectives include psychology, management science, sociology, political science and economics. Studies of behavioral decision making in naturalistic and applied settings are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信