“You and me”: Parental perceptions on asymmetry in twins' development and their dominance relationship dynamics

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Hila Segal, Yonat Rum, Adi Barkan, Ariel Knafo-Noam
{"title":"“You and me”: Parental perceptions on asymmetry in twins' development and their dominance relationship dynamics","authors":"Hila Segal,&nbsp;Yonat Rum,&nbsp;Adi Barkan,&nbsp;Ariel Knafo-Noam","doi":"10.1111/fare.13104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study investigated the role of nontypical development in the relative dominance in twins' relationships throughout childhood.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Dominance dynamics, affecting siblings' well-being, are different in twins than in singletons for whom age and development often dictate sibling hierarchy. These dynamics in twins, who share similar ages and developmental contexts, remain underexplored and demand further understanding.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A longitudinal study surveyed 1,547 mothers and 536 fathers of 322 monozygotic (sharing nearly 100% genes) and 1,199 dizygotic (sharing 50% genetic variance) twin pairs, aged 3 to 8–9. Both parents reported on the twins' relationships. Mothers reported whether either twin had a developmental condition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No dominance difference was found in similar developmental conditions dyads, whether both twins had typical or nontypical development. However, in dyads where twins differed in the developmental condition, nontypically developing twins were less dominant than their typically developing cotwins. This dominance imbalance persisted throughout childhood, even if initial developmental issues were resolved.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>From parents' perspectives, nontypical development does not, in itself, prevent children from demonstrating dominance behaviors in twinship, but it is more likely that the asymmetry in developmental conditions is associated with the relationship between the twins.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications and Recommendations</h3>\n \n <p>According to parents' perceptions, twins with nontypical development might experience imbalances in their relationship throughout childhood when their co-twin is a typically developing child. However, demonstrating dominance might be possible for them in other contexts. Understanding these dominance dynamics is vital for caregivers, informing tailored parenting strategies and interventions to support the well-being of children.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"74 1","pages":"102-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fare.13104","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study investigated the role of nontypical development in the relative dominance in twins' relationships throughout childhood.

Background

Dominance dynamics, affecting siblings' well-being, are different in twins than in singletons for whom age and development often dictate sibling hierarchy. These dynamics in twins, who share similar ages and developmental contexts, remain underexplored and demand further understanding.

Method

A longitudinal study surveyed 1,547 mothers and 536 fathers of 322 monozygotic (sharing nearly 100% genes) and 1,199 dizygotic (sharing 50% genetic variance) twin pairs, aged 3 to 8–9. Both parents reported on the twins' relationships. Mothers reported whether either twin had a developmental condition.

Results

No dominance difference was found in similar developmental conditions dyads, whether both twins had typical or nontypical development. However, in dyads where twins differed in the developmental condition, nontypically developing twins were less dominant than their typically developing cotwins. This dominance imbalance persisted throughout childhood, even if initial developmental issues were resolved.

Conclusion

From parents' perspectives, nontypical development does not, in itself, prevent children from demonstrating dominance behaviors in twinship, but it is more likely that the asymmetry in developmental conditions is associated with the relationship between the twins.

Implications and Recommendations

According to parents' perceptions, twins with nontypical development might experience imbalances in their relationship throughout childhood when their co-twin is a typically developing child. However, demonstrating dominance might be possible for them in other contexts. Understanding these dominance dynamics is vital for caregivers, informing tailored parenting strategies and interventions to support the well-being of children.

Abstract Image

“你和我”:父母对双胞胎发育不对称的看法及其优势关系动态
目的探讨非典型发育在童年时期双胞胎关系中相对优势的作用。影响兄弟姐妹幸福的优势动力在双胞胎和单胎中是不同的,因为单胎的年龄和发育通常决定了兄弟姐妹的等级。年龄和发育背景相似的双胞胎的这些动态仍未得到充分探索,需要进一步了解。方法对年龄在3 ~ 8 ~ 9岁的322对同卵双胞胎(基因共享率接近100%)和1199对异卵双胞胎(基因共享率50%)的1547对母亲和536对父亲进行纵向研究。父母双方都报告了双胞胎的关系。母亲们报告双胞胎中的任何一个是否有发育问题。结果在发育条件相似的双子体中,无论是典型发育还是非典型发育,均无显性差异。然而,在双胞胎发育条件不同的双胞体中,非典型发育的双胞胎比典型发育的双胞胎更不占优势。即使最初的发育问题得到解决,这种支配地位的不平衡也会持续整个童年。从父母的角度来看,非典型发育本身并不能阻止孩子在双胞胎中表现出优势行为,但更有可能的是发育条件的不对称与双胞胎之间的关系有关。启示和建议根据父母的看法,非典型发育的双胞胎在整个童年时期可能会经历关系的不平衡,而他们的孪生兄弟是典型发育的孩子。然而,在其他情况下,他们可能会表现出支配地位。了解这些优势动态对照顾者来说至关重要,为量身定制的养育策略和干预措施提供信息,以支持儿童的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信