Artificial Intelligence–Based Psychotherapeutic Intervention on Psychological Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Ying Lau, Wei How Darryl Ang, Wen Wei Ang, Patrick Cheong-Iao Pang, Sai Ho Wong, Kin Sun Chan
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence–Based Psychotherapeutic Intervention on Psychological Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression","authors":"Ying Lau,&nbsp;Wei How Darryl Ang,&nbsp;Wen Wei Ang,&nbsp;Patrick Cheong-Iao Pang,&nbsp;Sai Ho Wong,&nbsp;Kin Sun Chan","doi":"10.1155/da/8930012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Artificial intelligence (AI)–based psychotherapeutic interventions may bring a new and viable approach to expanding psychiatric care. However, evidence of their effectiveness remains scarce. We evaluated the efficacy of AI-based psychotherapeutic interventions on depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms at postintervention and follow-up assessments.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A three-step comprehensive search via nine electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses) was performed.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Thirty randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in 31 publications involving 6100 participants from nine countries were included. The majority (79.1%) of trials with intention-to-treat analysis but less than half (48.6%) of trials with perprotocol analysis were graded as low risk. Meta-analyses showed that interventions significantly reduced depressive symptoms at the postintervention assessment (<i>t</i> = −4.40, <i>p</i> = 0.001) with medium effect size (<i>g</i> = −0.54, 95% CI: −0.79 to −0.29) and at 6–12 months of assessment (<i>t</i> = −3.14, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.016) with small effect size (<i>g</i> = −0.23, 95% CI: −0.40 to −0.06) in comparison with comparators. Our subgroup analyses revealed that the depressed participants had a significantly larger effect size in reducing depressive symptoms than participants with stress and other conditions. At postintervention and follow-up assessments, we discovered that AI-based psychotherapeutic interventions did not significantly alter anxiety, stress, and the total scores of depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms in comparison to comparators. The random-effects univariate meta-regression did not identify any significant covariates for depressive and anxiety symptoms at postintervention. The certainty of evidence ranged between moderate and very low.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> AI-based psychotherapeutic interventions can be used in addition to usual treatments for reducing depressive symptoms. Well-designed RCTs with long-term follow-up data are warranted.</p>\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> CRD42022330228</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/8930012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/8930012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)–based psychotherapeutic interventions may bring a new and viable approach to expanding psychiatric care. However, evidence of their effectiveness remains scarce. We evaluated the efficacy of AI-based psychotherapeutic interventions on depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms at postintervention and follow-up assessments.

Methods: A three-step comprehensive search via nine electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses) was performed.

Results: Thirty randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in 31 publications involving 6100 participants from nine countries were included. The majority (79.1%) of trials with intention-to-treat analysis but less than half (48.6%) of trials with perprotocol analysis were graded as low risk. Meta-analyses showed that interventions significantly reduced depressive symptoms at the postintervention assessment (t = −4.40, p = 0.001) with medium effect size (g = −0.54, 95% CI: −0.79 to −0.29) and at 6–12 months of assessment (t = −3.14, p < 0.016) with small effect size (g = −0.23, 95% CI: −0.40 to −0.06) in comparison with comparators. Our subgroup analyses revealed that the depressed participants had a significantly larger effect size in reducing depressive symptoms than participants with stress and other conditions. At postintervention and follow-up assessments, we discovered that AI-based psychotherapeutic interventions did not significantly alter anxiety, stress, and the total scores of depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms in comparison to comparators. The random-effects univariate meta-regression did not identify any significant covariates for depressive and anxiety symptoms at postintervention. The certainty of evidence ranged between moderate and very low.

Conclusions: AI-based psychotherapeutic interventions can be used in addition to usual treatments for reducing depressive symptoms. Well-designed RCTs with long-term follow-up data are warranted.

Trial Registration: CRD42022330228

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信