Low Richness of Invasive Non-Native Plants in New Zealand Indigenous Forests May Not Reflect Low Impact

IF 4.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Laureline Rossignaud, Philip E. Hulme
{"title":"Low Richness of Invasive Non-Native Plants in New Zealand Indigenous Forests May Not Reflect Low Impact","authors":"Laureline Rossignaud,&nbsp;Philip E. Hulme","doi":"10.1111/ddi.13965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Identifying habitats vulnerable to plant invasions is essential for developing efficient management programmes. We assessed trends in richness and cover of non-native plants in indigenous shrublands and forests across New Zealand. We investigated whether species classed as invasive species exhibited higher levels of plant invasion than naturalised species and the extent to which this reflected plant life form.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>New Zealand.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>From January 2009 to March 2014.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Plant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analysed 839 permanent 20 × 20 m plots spread across New Zealand that could be classified to a recognised forest type: mānuka-kānuka shrubland, beech, beech-broadleaved, beech-broadleaved-podocarp and broadleaved-podocarp forests. Generalised additive models were run with native canopy richness or cover and spatial coordinates as co-variables in order to compare non-native plant richness and cover across forest types in relation to their invasive status and growth form.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 35% of the plots had at least one non-native species. Mānuka-kānuka shrubland exhibited the highest mean non-native richness (11 species) and cover (32%) with broadleaved-podocarp forest presenting the next highest invasion level but to a much lesser extent (1.7 species and 3% cover). Despite presenting overall greater non-native richness, naturalised species had lower cover than invasive species (4.2%, 13.5%, respectively). This pattern was mainly related to non-native woody species that, despite their low richness, can reach greater cover than herbaceous species once established.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Despite half the New Zealand flora being composed of non-native plant species, relatively few were found in forest habitats. However, indigenous shrubland and early successional forests showed higher vulnerability to plant invasion. Woody species, which are overrepresented among invasive species, had higher cover than herbaceous species and were less limited by native canopy cover. Such findings highlight the threat posed by non-native woody species and the need for more targeted management programmes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.13965","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.13965","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Identifying habitats vulnerable to plant invasions is essential for developing efficient management programmes. We assessed trends in richness and cover of non-native plants in indigenous shrublands and forests across New Zealand. We investigated whether species classed as invasive species exhibited higher levels of plant invasion than naturalised species and the extent to which this reflected plant life form.

Location

New Zealand.

Time Period

From January 2009 to March 2014.

Major Taxa Studied

Plant.

Methods

We analysed 839 permanent 20 × 20 m plots spread across New Zealand that could be classified to a recognised forest type: mānuka-kānuka shrubland, beech, beech-broadleaved, beech-broadleaved-podocarp and broadleaved-podocarp forests. Generalised additive models were run with native canopy richness or cover and spatial coordinates as co-variables in order to compare non-native plant richness and cover across forest types in relation to their invasive status and growth form.

Results

Overall, 35% of the plots had at least one non-native species. Mānuka-kānuka shrubland exhibited the highest mean non-native richness (11 species) and cover (32%) with broadleaved-podocarp forest presenting the next highest invasion level but to a much lesser extent (1.7 species and 3% cover). Despite presenting overall greater non-native richness, naturalised species had lower cover than invasive species (4.2%, 13.5%, respectively). This pattern was mainly related to non-native woody species that, despite their low richness, can reach greater cover than herbaceous species once established.

Main Conclusions

Despite half the New Zealand flora being composed of non-native plant species, relatively few were found in forest habitats. However, indigenous shrubland and early successional forests showed higher vulnerability to plant invasion. Woody species, which are overrepresented among invasive species, had higher cover than herbaceous species and were less limited by native canopy cover. Such findings highlight the threat posed by non-native woody species and the need for more targeted management programmes.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diversity and Distributions
Diversity and Distributions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
195
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信