Shuangyue Wang, Heqing Huang, Fengqiao Huang, Haiyan Wu, Zhiru Li, Ziyan Zhou, Min Kang
{"title":"Prognostic Analysis of Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Older Patients Undergoing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy","authors":"Shuangyue Wang, Heqing Huang, Fengqiao Huang, Haiyan Wu, Zhiru Li, Ziyan Zhou, Min Kang","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/8833803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> We investigated a visual model for estimating prognosis in older patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and analyzed the survival rates in different patient groups during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Between January 2012 and March 2021, patients with NPC aged > 65 years who received IMRT and were initially diagnosed with no distant metastases were enrolled. Propensity score analysis with 1:1 matching was used to balance baseline characteristics, including age, sex, tumor stage, and comorbidities. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to calculate survival. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). A nomogram was constructed based on the determined prognostic factors, and prediction accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> In total, 140 patients were included in the analysis (median age: 69 years; range: 66–81 years). The median follow-up was 84.9 (26.2–131.5) months. Compared with radiotherapy (RT) alone, chemotherapy during RT failed to improve OS (54.2% vs. 50.0%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.969), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (59.1% vs. 60.5%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.712), distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS) (66.7% vs. 70.5%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.824), or locoregional relapse–free survival (LRFS) (85.0% vs. 86.9%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.811). After the final regression analysis, age, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) score, N stage, and total stage were identified as independent factors affecting OS prognosis. The OS nomogram was applied to the data and, based on the value of the area under the ROC and calibration curves, demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Survival outcomes in older patients with NPC treated with RT alone were similar to those in patients treated with both chemotherapy and RT. Our nomogram had good performance in predicting OS in older patients with NPC and may benefit the clinical decision-making process.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/8833803","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/8833803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: We investigated a visual model for estimating prognosis in older patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and analyzed the survival rates in different patient groups during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
Methods: Between January 2012 and March 2021, patients with NPC aged > 65 years who received IMRT and were initially diagnosed with no distant metastases were enrolled. Propensity score analysis with 1:1 matching was used to balance baseline characteristics, including age, sex, tumor stage, and comorbidities. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to calculate survival. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). A nomogram was constructed based on the determined prognostic factors, and prediction accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves.
Results: In total, 140 patients were included in the analysis (median age: 69 years; range: 66–81 years). The median follow-up was 84.9 (26.2–131.5) months. Compared with radiotherapy (RT) alone, chemotherapy during RT failed to improve OS (54.2% vs. 50.0%, respectively; p = 0.969), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (59.1% vs. 60.5%, respectively; p = 0.712), distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS) (66.7% vs. 70.5%, respectively; p = 0.824), or locoregional relapse–free survival (LRFS) (85.0% vs. 86.9%, respectively; p = 0.811). After the final regression analysis, age, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) score, N stage, and total stage were identified as independent factors affecting OS prognosis. The OS nomogram was applied to the data and, based on the value of the area under the ROC and calibration curves, demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance.
Conclusions: Survival outcomes in older patients with NPC treated with RT alone were similar to those in patients treated with both chemotherapy and RT. Our nomogram had good performance in predicting OS in older patients with NPC and may benefit the clinical decision-making process.
期刊介绍:
IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal.
IJCP publishes:
Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed]
Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
International scope
IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.