Prognostic Analysis of Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Older Patients Undergoing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shuangyue Wang, Heqing Huang, Fengqiao Huang, Haiyan Wu, Zhiru Li, Ziyan Zhou, Min Kang
{"title":"Prognostic Analysis of Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Older Patients Undergoing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy","authors":"Shuangyue Wang,&nbsp;Heqing Huang,&nbsp;Fengqiao Huang,&nbsp;Haiyan Wu,&nbsp;Zhiru Li,&nbsp;Ziyan Zhou,&nbsp;Min Kang","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/8833803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> We investigated a visual model for estimating prognosis in older patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and analyzed the survival rates in different patient groups during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Between January 2012 and March 2021, patients with NPC aged &gt; 65 years who received IMRT and were initially diagnosed with no distant metastases were enrolled. Propensity score analysis with 1:1 matching was used to balance baseline characteristics, including age, sex, tumor stage, and comorbidities. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to calculate survival. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). A nomogram was constructed based on the determined prognostic factors, and prediction accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> In total, 140 patients were included in the analysis (median age: 69 years; range: 66–81 years). The median follow-up was 84.9 (26.2–131.5) months. Compared with radiotherapy (RT) alone, chemotherapy during RT failed to improve OS (54.2% vs. 50.0%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.969), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (59.1% vs. 60.5%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.712), distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS) (66.7% vs. 70.5%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.824), or locoregional relapse–free survival (LRFS) (85.0% vs. 86.9%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.811). After the final regression analysis, age, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) score, N stage, and total stage were identified as independent factors affecting OS prognosis. The OS nomogram was applied to the data and, based on the value of the area under the ROC and calibration curves, demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Survival outcomes in older patients with NPC treated with RT alone were similar to those in patients treated with both chemotherapy and RT. Our nomogram had good performance in predicting OS in older patients with NPC and may benefit the clinical decision-making process.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/8833803","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/8833803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We investigated a visual model for estimating prognosis in older patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and analyzed the survival rates in different patient groups during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Methods: Between January 2012 and March 2021, patients with NPC aged > 65 years who received IMRT and were initially diagnosed with no distant metastases were enrolled. Propensity score analysis with 1:1 matching was used to balance baseline characteristics, including age, sex, tumor stage, and comorbidities. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to calculate survival. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). A nomogram was constructed based on the determined prognostic factors, and prediction accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves.

Results: In total, 140 patients were included in the analysis (median age: 69 years; range: 66–81 years). The median follow-up was 84.9 (26.2–131.5) months. Compared with radiotherapy (RT) alone, chemotherapy during RT failed to improve OS (54.2% vs. 50.0%, respectively; p = 0.969), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (59.1% vs. 60.5%, respectively; p = 0.712), distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS) (66.7% vs. 70.5%, respectively; p = 0.824), or locoregional relapse–free survival (LRFS) (85.0% vs. 86.9%, respectively; p = 0.811). After the final regression analysis, age, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) score, N stage, and total stage were identified as independent factors affecting OS prognosis. The OS nomogram was applied to the data and, based on the value of the area under the ROC and calibration curves, demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance.

Conclusions: Survival outcomes in older patients with NPC treated with RT alone were similar to those in patients treated with both chemotherapy and RT. Our nomogram had good performance in predicting OS in older patients with NPC and may benefit the clinical decision-making process.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信