Full-tensor magnetic gradiometry: Comparison with scalar total magnetic intensity, processing and visualization guidelines

IF 1.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Hernan Ugalde, Bill Morris, Akshay Kamath, Brian Parsons
{"title":"Full-tensor magnetic gradiometry: Comparison with scalar total magnetic intensity, processing and visualization guidelines","authors":"Hernan Ugalde,&nbsp;Bill Morris,&nbsp;Akshay Kamath,&nbsp;Brian Parsons","doi":"10.1111/1365-2478.13629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Full-tensor magnetic gradiometry data have been collected commercially for the last few years. However, to date, there is still no clarity on how to compare these data to scalar total field surveys. Some users display the vertical gradient of the vertical component (<i>B</i><sub>zz</sub>) and compare that to a first vertical derivative of total field with the caveat that ‘they are similar’. Others compute the length of the measured vector and call that total field. We establish the basic formulas to calculate total field from the tensor components and demonstrate this with a real data example from Thompson, Manitoba, Canada. Another key question is whether full-tensor interpolation is required to obtain total field from tensor data. We compare the results from using a commercial full-tensor interpolation algorithm with standard minimum curvature of the tensor components individually and with another open-source code that uses a radial basis function interpolator on the individual tensor components. All three applications produced a total field grid of superior quality to that calculated from a scalar total field survey available for the area of study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12793,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Prospecting","volume":"73 1","pages":"303-314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Prospecting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2478.13629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Full-tensor magnetic gradiometry data have been collected commercially for the last few years. However, to date, there is still no clarity on how to compare these data to scalar total field surveys. Some users display the vertical gradient of the vertical component (Bzz) and compare that to a first vertical derivative of total field with the caveat that ‘they are similar’. Others compute the length of the measured vector and call that total field. We establish the basic formulas to calculate total field from the tensor components and demonstrate this with a real data example from Thompson, Manitoba, Canada. Another key question is whether full-tensor interpolation is required to obtain total field from tensor data. We compare the results from using a commercial full-tensor interpolation algorithm with standard minimum curvature of the tensor components individually and with another open-source code that uses a radial basis function interpolator on the individual tensor components. All three applications produced a total field grid of superior quality to that calculated from a scalar total field survey available for the area of study.

全张量磁梯度法:与标量总磁强度的比较,处理和可视化指南
在过去的几年里,全张量磁梯度测量数据已经开始商业化收集。然而,到目前为止,如何将这些数据与纯量野外调查进行比较仍不清楚。有些用户显示垂直分量(Bzz)的垂直梯度,并将其与总字段的第一个垂直导数进行比较,并警告说“它们是相似的”。其他方法计算测量向量的长度,并将其称为总场。我们建立了从张量分量计算总场的基本公式,并以加拿大马尼托巴省汤普森的实际数据为例进行了验证。另一个关键问题是是否需要全张量插值来从张量数据中获得总场。我们比较了使用单个张量分量的标准最小曲率的商业全张量插值算法和另一个在单个张量分量上使用径向基函数插值器的开源代码的结果。所有这三种应用程序产生的总现场网格的质量优于研究地区可用的标量总现场调查计算的网格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geophysical Prospecting
Geophysical Prospecting 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.50%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Prospecting publishes the best in primary research on the science of geophysics as it applies to the exploration, evaluation and extraction of earth resources. Drawing heavily on contributions from researchers in the oil and mineral exploration industries, the journal has a very practical slant. Although the journal provides a valuable forum for communication among workers in these fields, it is also ideally suited to researchers in academic geophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信