Optimising Neural Networks for Enhanced Fracture Density Prediction in Surrounding Rock of Coalbed Methane Reservoir

IF 1.4 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Geological Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1002/gj.5075
Xinyang Men, Shida Chen, Heng Wu, Bin Zhang, Yafei Zhang, Shu Tao
{"title":"Optimising Neural Networks for Enhanced Fracture Density Prediction in Surrounding Rock of Coalbed Methane Reservoir","authors":"Xinyang Men,&nbsp;Shida Chen,&nbsp;Heng Wu,&nbsp;Bin Zhang,&nbsp;Yafei Zhang,&nbsp;Shu Tao","doi":"10.1002/gj.5075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Fractures influence the mechanical strength of coal roof and floor, constraining the design of hydraulic fracturing for coalbed methane production. Currently, the predominant approach involves the integration of petrophysical logging with machine learning for fracture prediction. Nevertheless, challenges exist regarding the model's accuracy. In this study, we present a novel approach to predict fracture density. Our method optimises a back-propagation (BP) neural network and utilises principal component analysis for feature extraction. We employ logging parameters (density, compensated neutron and acoustic time difference) obtained from Shouyang Block well SY-1 and fracture density data from electrical imaging logging to construct the FVDC model's dataset. The BP neural network model is optimised using the Sparrow Search algorithm and Tent Chaotic Mapping. The results demonstrate a substantial enhancement over the BP neural network model, with reductions of 80.102% in mean absolute error, 94.182% in mean square error, 75.879% in root mean square error and 79.764% in mean absolute percentage error. When considering accuracy, the optimised model (97.098%) surpasses the support vector regression model (96.478%), the random forest model (94.404%) and the BP neural network model (85.657%). Scalability testing for the optimised model was conducted using data from well SY-2, yielding a remarkable prediction accuracy of 96.775%. This performance exceeds that of the BP neural network (with an accuracy of 85.102%), as well as the random forest and support vector regression models (with accuracies of 91.234% and 90.384%, respectively). These results underscore the potential of well logging and machine learning in FVDC prediction.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12784,"journal":{"name":"Geological Journal","volume":"60 1","pages":"73-86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gj.5075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fractures influence the mechanical strength of coal roof and floor, constraining the design of hydraulic fracturing for coalbed methane production. Currently, the predominant approach involves the integration of petrophysical logging with machine learning for fracture prediction. Nevertheless, challenges exist regarding the model's accuracy. In this study, we present a novel approach to predict fracture density. Our method optimises a back-propagation (BP) neural network and utilises principal component analysis for feature extraction. We employ logging parameters (density, compensated neutron and acoustic time difference) obtained from Shouyang Block well SY-1 and fracture density data from electrical imaging logging to construct the FVDC model's dataset. The BP neural network model is optimised using the Sparrow Search algorithm and Tent Chaotic Mapping. The results demonstrate a substantial enhancement over the BP neural network model, with reductions of 80.102% in mean absolute error, 94.182% in mean square error, 75.879% in root mean square error and 79.764% in mean absolute percentage error. When considering accuracy, the optimised model (97.098%) surpasses the support vector regression model (96.478%), the random forest model (94.404%) and the BP neural network model (85.657%). Scalability testing for the optimised model was conducted using data from well SY-2, yielding a remarkable prediction accuracy of 96.775%. This performance exceeds that of the BP neural network (with an accuracy of 85.102%), as well as the random forest and support vector regression models (with accuracies of 91.234% and 90.384%, respectively). These results underscore the potential of well logging and machine learning in FVDC prediction.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geological Journal
Geological Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
269
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: In recent years there has been a growth of specialist journals within geological sciences. Nevertheless, there is an important role for a journal of an interdisciplinary kind. Traditionally, GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL has been such a journal and continues in its aim of promoting interest in all branches of the Geological Sciences, through publication of original research papers and review articles. The journal publishes Special Issues with a common theme or regional coverage e.g. Chinese Dinosaurs; Tectonics of the Eastern Mediterranean, Triassic basins of the Central and North Atlantic Borderlands). These are extensively cited. The Journal has a particular interest in publishing papers on regional case studies from any global locality which have conclusions of general interest. Such papers may emphasize aspects across the full spectrum of geological sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信