Waterfalls Alter Reach-Scale Fluvial Erosion Rates: Evidence From Field Data and Process Modeling

IF 3.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sophie D. Rothman, Joel S. Scheingross, Scott W. McCoy
{"title":"Waterfalls Alter Reach-Scale Fluvial Erosion Rates: Evidence From Field Data and Process Modeling","authors":"Sophie D. Rothman,&nbsp;Joel S. Scheingross,&nbsp;Scott W. McCoy","doi":"10.1029/2024JF007792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Waterfalls are often interpreted as transient, upstream-propagating features that mark changes in external conditions. Thus, waterfalls are commonly used to infer past tectonic and climatic forcing, making understanding the controls on waterfall erosion central to predicting how external perturbations move through landscapes. Surprisingly, there exist few direct field measurements of waterfall erosion, and existing waterfall retreat measurements are rarely paired with measurements of waterfall morphology and frequency, which, theory suggests, modulate retreat rates. This lack of data limits our ability to test existing theory and explore how waterfalls alter reach-scale bedrock erosion rates. Here, we use cosmogenic <sup>10</sup>Be accumulated in bedrock riverbeds to measure erosion rates in fluvial reaches with varying waterfall frequency and morphology. We find that waterfall-rich reaches erode one to five times faster than the landscape average, and that reach-averaged erosion rates increase with increasing waterfall frequency. We develop a new, process-based model combining waterfall and planar-channel erosion to explore mechanistic controls on the relative erosion rate between waterfall-rich and waterfall-free reaches. This model predicts that reach-averaged erosion rates increase with waterfall frequency at low sediment supply, consistent with our field measurements, but that waterfalls can also slow reach-averaged erosion rates for high sediment supply, large grain sizes, low water discharge, or large plunge pools. Our work is consistent with previous suggestions that waterfall erosion rates may decrease in low drainage areas and can influence long-profile morphology.</p>","PeriodicalId":15887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","volume":"129 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JF007792","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Waterfalls are often interpreted as transient, upstream-propagating features that mark changes in external conditions. Thus, waterfalls are commonly used to infer past tectonic and climatic forcing, making understanding the controls on waterfall erosion central to predicting how external perturbations move through landscapes. Surprisingly, there exist few direct field measurements of waterfall erosion, and existing waterfall retreat measurements are rarely paired with measurements of waterfall morphology and frequency, which, theory suggests, modulate retreat rates. This lack of data limits our ability to test existing theory and explore how waterfalls alter reach-scale bedrock erosion rates. Here, we use cosmogenic 10Be accumulated in bedrock riverbeds to measure erosion rates in fluvial reaches with varying waterfall frequency and morphology. We find that waterfall-rich reaches erode one to five times faster than the landscape average, and that reach-averaged erosion rates increase with increasing waterfall frequency. We develop a new, process-based model combining waterfall and planar-channel erosion to explore mechanistic controls on the relative erosion rate between waterfall-rich and waterfall-free reaches. This model predicts that reach-averaged erosion rates increase with waterfall frequency at low sediment supply, consistent with our field measurements, but that waterfalls can also slow reach-averaged erosion rates for high sediment supply, large grain sizes, low water discharge, or large plunge pools. Our work is consistent with previous suggestions that waterfall erosion rates may decrease in low drainage areas and can influence long-profile morphology.

瀑布改变河段河流侵蚀率:来自实地数据和过程建模的证据
瀑布通常被解释为短暂的、上游传播的特征,标志着外部条件的变化。因此,瀑布通常被用来推断过去的构造和气候强迫,这使得了解对瀑布侵蚀的控制对于预测外部扰动如何在景观中移动至关重要。令人惊讶的是,很少有直接的瀑布侵蚀现场测量,而且现有的瀑布退缩测量很少与瀑布形态和频率的测量相匹配,理论表明,瀑布形态和频率可以调节退缩率。数据的缺乏限制了我们检验现有理论和探索瀑布如何改变河段基岩侵蚀速率的能力。在这里,我们使用在基岩河床中积累的宇宙成因10Be来测量具有不同瀑布频率和形态的河流河段的侵蚀速率。我们发现,瀑布丰富的河段的侵蚀速度比景观平均速度快1到5倍,而且随着瀑布频率的增加,河段的平均侵蚀速度也在增加。我们开发了一个新的基于过程的模型,结合瀑布和平面通道侵蚀来探索富瀑布和无瀑布河段之间相对侵蚀速率的机制控制。该模型预测,在含沙量低的情况下,平均河段侵蚀率随着瀑布频率的增加而增加,这与我们的实地测量结果一致,但在含沙量高、粒度大、水量少或大型瀑布池的情况下,瀑布也会减慢河段平均侵蚀率。我们的工作与之前的建议一致,即瀑布侵蚀率可能会在低排水区减少,并可能影响长剖面形态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
162
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信