{"title":"Unlocking Responsive and Unresponsive Signatures: A Transfer Learning Approach for Automated Classification in Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Lesions","authors":"Mehdi Bamorovat, Iraj Sharifi, Amirhossein Tahmouresi, Setareh Agha Kuchak Afshari, Esmat Rashedi","doi":"10.1155/tbed/5018632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) remains a significant global public health disease, with the critical distinction and exact detection between responsive and unresponsive cases dictating treatment strategies and patient outcomes. However, image-based methods for differentiating these groups are unexplored. This study addresses this gap by developing a deep learning (DL) model utilizing transfer learning to automatically identify responses in CL lesions. A dataset of 102 lesion images (51 per class; equally distributed across train, test, and validation sets) is employed. The DenseNet161, VGG16, and ResNet18 networks, pretrained on a massive image dataset, are fine-tuned for our specific task. The models achieved an accuracy of 76.47%, 73.53%, and 55.88% on the test data, respectively, with a sensitivity of 80%, 75%, and 100% and specificity of 73.68%, 72.22%, and 53.12%, individually. Transfer learning successfully addressed the limited sample size challenge, demonstrating the models’ potential for real-world application. This work underscores the significance of automated response detection in CL, paving the way for treatment and improved patient outcomes. While acknowledging limitations like the sample size, the need for collaborative efforts is emphasized to expand datasets and further refine the model. This approach stands as a beacon of hope in the contest against CL, illuminating the path toward a future where data-driven diagnostics guide effective treatment and alleviate the suffering of countless patients. Moreover, the study could be a turning point in eliminating this important global public health and widespread disease.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/5018632","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/5018632","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) remains a significant global public health disease, with the critical distinction and exact detection between responsive and unresponsive cases dictating treatment strategies and patient outcomes. However, image-based methods for differentiating these groups are unexplored. This study addresses this gap by developing a deep learning (DL) model utilizing transfer learning to automatically identify responses in CL lesions. A dataset of 102 lesion images (51 per class; equally distributed across train, test, and validation sets) is employed. The DenseNet161, VGG16, and ResNet18 networks, pretrained on a massive image dataset, are fine-tuned for our specific task. The models achieved an accuracy of 76.47%, 73.53%, and 55.88% on the test data, respectively, with a sensitivity of 80%, 75%, and 100% and specificity of 73.68%, 72.22%, and 53.12%, individually. Transfer learning successfully addressed the limited sample size challenge, demonstrating the models’ potential for real-world application. This work underscores the significance of automated response detection in CL, paving the way for treatment and improved patient outcomes. While acknowledging limitations like the sample size, the need for collaborative efforts is emphasized to expand datasets and further refine the model. This approach stands as a beacon of hope in the contest against CL, illuminating the path toward a future where data-driven diagnostics guide effective treatment and alleviate the suffering of countless patients. Moreover, the study could be a turning point in eliminating this important global public health and widespread disease.
期刊介绍:
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions):
Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread.
Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope.
Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies.
Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies).
Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.