Gully erosion susceptibility mapping in the Loess Plateau and the Northeast China Mollisol region: Optimal resolution and algorithms, influencing factors and spatial distribution

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Annan Yang, Chunmei Wang, Qinke Yang, Guowei Pang, Yongqing Long, Lei Wang, Richard M. Cruse
{"title":"Gully erosion susceptibility mapping in the Loess Plateau and the Northeast China Mollisol region: Optimal resolution and algorithms, influencing factors and spatial distribution","authors":"Annan Yang,&nbsp;Chunmei Wang,&nbsp;Qinke Yang,&nbsp;Guowei Pang,&nbsp;Yongqing Long,&nbsp;Lei Wang,&nbsp;Richard M. Cruse","doi":"10.1002/esp.6059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gully erosion susceptibility (GES) mapping is crucial for controlling gully erosion hazards and has become a significant focus of global research and management efforts. Machine learning models have proven effective in this field. However, in areas with different terrain complexity, the model shows significant variation in optimal resolution and algorithms, factor importance and spatial distribution of the model results, which limits their broader application. This study compares GES mapping in two small watersheds: one located in the complex terrain of the Loess Plateau and the other in the relatively flat terrain of the Northeast China Mollisol region. The model predictive accuracy was evaluated using 30% of the datasets that were excluded from model training. The results revealed that: 1) significant differences in optimal resolution of GES mapping in the two regions, which were 1–2.5 m for the Mollisol region, and 2.5–5 m for the Loess Plateau. The extreme boosting tree (XGBoost) algorithm achieved the best simulation results compared to random forest (RF) and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) in both regions. 2) Slope gradient and contributing area influenced gully distribution in both watersheds, with land use being critical in the Loess Plateau and distance from streams more important in the Mollisol region. 3) In the Loess Plateau watershed, 25% of the area was highly susceptible to gully erosion, while only 1% of the Mollisol watershed was highly susceptible. This research compared GES mapping in two watersheds with different terrain complexity, which would be beneficial for better use of machine learning in gully research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11408,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.6059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gully erosion susceptibility (GES) mapping is crucial for controlling gully erosion hazards and has become a significant focus of global research and management efforts. Machine learning models have proven effective in this field. However, in areas with different terrain complexity, the model shows significant variation in optimal resolution and algorithms, factor importance and spatial distribution of the model results, which limits their broader application. This study compares GES mapping in two small watersheds: one located in the complex terrain of the Loess Plateau and the other in the relatively flat terrain of the Northeast China Mollisol region. The model predictive accuracy was evaluated using 30% of the datasets that were excluded from model training. The results revealed that: 1) significant differences in optimal resolution of GES mapping in the two regions, which were 1–2.5 m for the Mollisol region, and 2.5–5 m for the Loess Plateau. The extreme boosting tree (XGBoost) algorithm achieved the best simulation results compared to random forest (RF) and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) in both regions. 2) Slope gradient and contributing area influenced gully distribution in both watersheds, with land use being critical in the Loess Plateau and distance from streams more important in the Mollisol region. 3) In the Loess Plateau watershed, 25% of the area was highly susceptible to gully erosion, while only 1% of the Mollisol watershed was highly susceptible. This research compared GES mapping in two watersheds with different terrain complexity, which would be beneficial for better use of machine learning in gully research.

Abstract Image

黄土高原与东北旱塬地区沟壑区侵蚀敏感性填图:最优分辨率与算法、影响因素与空间分布
沟蚀敏感性制图是控制沟蚀危害的重要手段,已成为全球研究和管理的重要焦点。机器学习模型在这个领域已经被证明是有效的。然而,在地形复杂程度不同的地区,模型在最优分辨率和算法、因子重要性以及模型结果的空间分布等方面存在显著差异,限制了模型的广泛应用。本文比较了黄土高原地形复杂地区和东北Mollisol地区地形相对平坦地区两个小流域的GES制图。使用从模型训练中排除的30%的数据集来评估模型的预测准确性。结果表明:①两区GES制图的最佳分辨率差异显著,Mollisol区为1 ~ 2.5 m,黄土高原为2.5 ~ 5 m;与随机森林(RF)和梯度增强决策树(GBDT)相比,极限增强树(XGBoost)算法在这两个区域都取得了最好的仿真结果。(2)坡度和贡献面积影响两流域沟壑区的分布,黄土高原地区的沟壑区以土地利用为主,Mollisol地区的沟壑区与河流的距离更为重要。③黄土高原流域沟蚀高度易感区面积为25%,而Mollisol流域高度易感区面积仅为1%。本研究比较了不同地形复杂性流域的GES制图,有助于更好地将机器学习应用于沟壑研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
215
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms is an interdisciplinary international journal concerned with: the interactions between surface processes and landforms and landscapes; that lead to physical, chemical and biological changes; and which in turn create; current landscapes and the geological record of past landscapes. Its focus is core to both physical geographical and geological communities, and also the wider geosciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信