Clinical Subtypes and Prognostic Outcomes of Rhabdomyolysis in ICU Patients

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shan Xu, Kaixiu Qin, Dan Zhang
{"title":"Clinical Subtypes and Prognostic Outcomes of Rhabdomyolysis in ICU Patients","authors":"Shan Xu,&nbsp;Kaixiu Qin,&nbsp;Dan Zhang","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/3392487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Rhabdomyolysis (RM) is a severe clinical syndrome with substantial heterogeneity that involves the rapid dissolution of skeletal muscles. The condition has a high prevalence and poor prognosis, particularly in critically ill patients. Subtypes of RM in critically ill patients have not been investigated.</p>\n <p><b>Objective:</b> The study aimed to link the clinical RM heterogeneity with distinct prognoses and associated characteristics among different subtypes using an unsupervised analysis.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Patients diagnosed with RM in the intensive care unit (ICU) from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU) were retrospectively enrolled. K-means clustering, guided by correlation coefficients and expert opinions in intensive care medicine, was applied to identify distinct RM clinical subtypes using routinely available parameters from the first 24 h after patient ICU admission. The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality. We assessed associations between subtypes and 28-day mortality, as well as between treatments and 28-day mortality in the derived subtypes, using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. The eICU database patients served as an external validation set. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAPs) were used to visualize features of each clinical subtype.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> A total of 2269 eligible subjects were extracted from the MIMIC-IV. Two distinct subtypes were identified (A and B) using 17 readily available clinical and biological variables. Patients assigned to Subtype A (<i>n</i> = 511) had a higher 28-day mortality. The proportion of organ support, comorbidity index, SAPS II, and SOFA scores were all significantly higher in the Subtype A group than in the Subtype B group (<i>n</i> = 1836). After adjusting for relevant covariates, Subtype A patients were independently associated with increased 28-day mortality (HR [95% CI] = 1.70 [1.36–2.11], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). These findings were further validated using an external cohort from the eICU dataset. Notably, Subtype A patients showed a higher mortality risk associated with sodium bicarbonate use (HR [95% CI] 1.62 [1.20–2.19], <i>p</i> = 0.002).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> We identified two subtypes with distinct clinical features and outcomes. Subtype A is independently associated with poor outcomes and shows increased mortality risk with sodium bicarbonate use. These findings may help clinicians better distinguish prognoses and treatment responses among RM patients.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/3392487","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/3392487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rhabdomyolysis (RM) is a severe clinical syndrome with substantial heterogeneity that involves the rapid dissolution of skeletal muscles. The condition has a high prevalence and poor prognosis, particularly in critically ill patients. Subtypes of RM in critically ill patients have not been investigated.

Objective: The study aimed to link the clinical RM heterogeneity with distinct prognoses and associated characteristics among different subtypes using an unsupervised analysis.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with RM in the intensive care unit (ICU) from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU) were retrospectively enrolled. K-means clustering, guided by correlation coefficients and expert opinions in intensive care medicine, was applied to identify distinct RM clinical subtypes using routinely available parameters from the first 24 h after patient ICU admission. The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality. We assessed associations between subtypes and 28-day mortality, as well as between treatments and 28-day mortality in the derived subtypes, using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. The eICU database patients served as an external validation set. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAPs) were used to visualize features of each clinical subtype.

Results: A total of 2269 eligible subjects were extracted from the MIMIC-IV. Two distinct subtypes were identified (A and B) using 17 readily available clinical and biological variables. Patients assigned to Subtype A (n = 511) had a higher 28-day mortality. The proportion of organ support, comorbidity index, SAPS II, and SOFA scores were all significantly higher in the Subtype A group than in the Subtype B group (n = 1836). After adjusting for relevant covariates, Subtype A patients were independently associated with increased 28-day mortality (HR [95% CI] = 1.70 [1.36–2.11], p < 0.001). These findings were further validated using an external cohort from the eICU dataset. Notably, Subtype A patients showed a higher mortality risk associated with sodium bicarbonate use (HR [95% CI] 1.62 [1.20–2.19], p = 0.002).

Conclusions: We identified two subtypes with distinct clinical features and outcomes. Subtype A is independently associated with poor outcomes and shows increased mortality risk with sodium bicarbonate use. These findings may help clinicians better distinguish prognoses and treatment responses among RM patients.

Abstract Image

ICU患者横纹肌溶解的临床亚型及预后
背景:横纹肌溶解(RM)是一种严重的临床综合征,具有很大的异质性,涉及骨骼肌的快速溶解。该病发病率高,预后差,特别是危重患者。危重患者的RM亚型尚未调查。目的:该研究旨在通过无监督分析将临床RM异质性与不同亚型的不同预后和相关特征联系起来。方法:回顾性纳入重症监护医学信息市场- iv (MIMIC-IV)数据库和eICU合作研究数据库(eICU)中诊断为RM的重症监护病房(ICU)患者。在重症监护医学相关系数和专家意见的指导下,采用K-means聚类方法,利用患者入院后24小时的常规可用参数识别不同的RM临床亚型。主要终点为28天死亡率。我们使用多变量Cox比例风险回归评估了亚型与28天死亡率之间的关系,以及衍生亚型中治疗与28天死亡率之间的关系。eICU数据库患者作为外部验证集。SHapley加性解释(SHAPs)用于可视化每个临床亚型的特征。结果:从MIMIC-IV中共提取了2269名符合条件的受试者。使用17个现成的临床和生物学变量确定了两种不同的亚型(A和B)。A亚型患者(n = 511) 28天死亡率较高。A亚型组的器官支持比例、合并症指数、SAPS II、SOFA评分均显著高于B亚型组(n = 1836)。调整相关协变量后,A亚型患者与28天死亡率增加独立相关(HR [95% CI] = 1.70 [1.36-2.11], p <;0.001)。使用eICU数据集的外部队列进一步验证了这些发现。值得注意的是,A型患者与使用碳酸氢钠相关的死亡风险较高(HR [95% CI] 1.62 [1.20-2.19], p = 0.002)。结论:我们确定了两种具有不同临床特征和结果的亚型。亚型A与不良预后独立相关,并显示使用碳酸氢钠会增加死亡风险。这些发现可能有助于临床医生更好地区分RM患者的预后和治疗反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信