Incremental Modification in the Existing Approaches for Affinity Chromatographic Enrichment of Phosphoproteins Improves Their Profile in Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis

IF 3 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Neha Agrawal, Rukmini Govekar
{"title":"Incremental Modification in the Existing Approaches for Affinity Chromatographic Enrichment of Phosphoproteins Improves Their Profile in Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis","authors":"Neha Agrawal,&nbsp;Rukmini Govekar","doi":"10.1002/ansa.202400058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cell signalling is a vital process in cell physiology, which is driven by protein phosphorylation. Global phosphoproteome analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has thus gained importance in cell signalling research. However, phosphoprotein identification by LC-MS/MS in whole cell lysates, which are complex protein mixtures, is hindered by their poor ionization coupled with suppression of peaks due to low abundance. Enrichment by immobilized metal ion- and metal oxide-affinity chromatography (IMAC and MOAC), which preferentially enrich multi- and mono-phosphorylated proteins, respectively, have improved their detection by MS. However, preferential enrichment limits phosphoproteome coverage in global analyses of cell lysates which contain mono- and multi-phosphorylated proteins. Improvement in their coverage by sequential elution approach that exploits the complementary chemistries of these matrices has been reported. In this study, we observed that the number of phosphoproteins detected using the sequential elution approach was lower (∼250–400) as compared to the theoretically predicted number (&gt;500) based on their reported 30% abundance in the cell proteome (1700–2200 proteins detected by MS in our cell lines). Acknowledging the merit of using multiple matrices, we used IMAC and MOAC individually and pooled the data. We observed a remarkable increase (&gt;30%) in phosphoproteome coverage. Further, though 98% of phosphoproteins were enriched by IMAC, among the remaining 2%, those detected exclusively by MOAC were biologically important. This justified the use of multiple matrices. Thus, an incremental modification of using multiple matrices individually rather than sequentially and pooling the data markedly improved the phosphoproteome coverage, which can positively impact cell signalling research.</p>","PeriodicalId":93411,"journal":{"name":"Analytical science advances","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ansa.202400058","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical science advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ansa.202400058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cell signalling is a vital process in cell physiology, which is driven by protein phosphorylation. Global phosphoproteome analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has thus gained importance in cell signalling research. However, phosphoprotein identification by LC-MS/MS in whole cell lysates, which are complex protein mixtures, is hindered by their poor ionization coupled with suppression of peaks due to low abundance. Enrichment by immobilized metal ion- and metal oxide-affinity chromatography (IMAC and MOAC), which preferentially enrich multi- and mono-phosphorylated proteins, respectively, have improved their detection by MS. However, preferential enrichment limits phosphoproteome coverage in global analyses of cell lysates which contain mono- and multi-phosphorylated proteins. Improvement in their coverage by sequential elution approach that exploits the complementary chemistries of these matrices has been reported. In this study, we observed that the number of phosphoproteins detected using the sequential elution approach was lower (∼250–400) as compared to the theoretically predicted number (>500) based on their reported 30% abundance in the cell proteome (1700–2200 proteins detected by MS in our cell lines). Acknowledging the merit of using multiple matrices, we used IMAC and MOAC individually and pooled the data. We observed a remarkable increase (>30%) in phosphoproteome coverage. Further, though 98% of phosphoproteins were enriched by IMAC, among the remaining 2%, those detected exclusively by MOAC were biologically important. This justified the use of multiple matrices. Thus, an incremental modification of using multiple matrices individually rather than sequentially and pooling the data markedly improved the phosphoproteome coverage, which can positively impact cell signalling research.

Abstract Image

对现有亲和层析富集磷蛋白方法的改进改善了其在液相色谱-串联质谱分析中的谱图
细胞信号传导是细胞生理中的一个重要过程,它是由蛋白磷酸化驱动的。因此,液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)全球磷蛋白质组分析在细胞信号研究中具有重要意义。然而,LC-MS/MS在全细胞裂解物中鉴定磷蛋白是一种复杂的蛋白质混合物,由于它们的电离性差以及丰度低导致的峰抑制,阻碍了它们的鉴定。固定化金属离子和金属氧化物亲和层析(IMAC和MOAC)分别优先富集多磷酸化和单磷酸化蛋白,提高了质谱检测的效率。然而,优先富集限制了对含有单磷酸化和多磷酸化蛋白的细胞裂解物进行全局分析的磷酸化蛋白质组覆盖率。通过利用这些基质的互补化学物质的顺序洗脱方法改善其覆盖范围已被报道。在这项研究中,我们观察到使用顺序洗脱方法检测到的磷蛋白数量比理论预测的数量(>500)要低(~ 250-400),这是基于它们在细胞蛋白质组中报道的30%丰度(MS在我们的细胞系中检测到1700-2200个蛋白)。考虑到使用多个矩阵的优点,我们分别使用了IMAC和MOAC,并汇集了数据。我们观察到磷蛋白组覆盖率显著增加(30%)。此外,尽管98%的磷酸化蛋白被IMAC富集,但在剩下的2%中,仅由MOAC检测到的磷酸化蛋白具有重要的生物学意义。这证明了使用多个矩阵是合理的。因此,单独使用多个基质而不是按顺序使用并汇集数据的增量修改显着提高了磷蛋白质组的覆盖率,这可以对细胞信号传导研究产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信