Responses to water limitation are independent of light for saplings of a seasonally dry tropical forest

IF 1.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Biotropica Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1111/btp.13404
Ron Sunny, Anirban Guha, Asmi Jezeera, Kavya Mohan N, Neha Mohanbabu, Deepak Barua
{"title":"Responses to water limitation are independent of light for saplings of a seasonally dry tropical forest","authors":"Ron Sunny,&nbsp;Anirban Guha,&nbsp;Asmi Jezeera,&nbsp;Kavya Mohan N,&nbsp;Neha Mohanbabu,&nbsp;Deepak Barua","doi":"10.1111/btp.13404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs) experience large spatial and temporal variation in water and light availability. The effect of heterogeneity in these limiting resources on species water use, physiology, and growth is still not well understood. We used a shade-house experiment to manipulate light and water availability and examine plant water uptake, leaf-level physiology, and sapling growth in four co-occurring SDTF species belonging to both evergreen and deciduous plant functional types. Water uptake varied dramatically among species with a fivefold difference in maximum whole-plant transpiration (WPT). While species differed in how WPT, leaf physiology, and growth responded to shade, there were no differences among species, or between evergreen and deciduous functional types, in responses to limited water. Importantly, responses to shade were independent of water availability in all four species. Changes in WPT in response to limited light and water were largely congruent with changes in leaf physiology and growth. However, the magnitude of change in leaf physiology was largely driven by light, while changes in WPT and growth were driven by water availability. Thus, whole-plant water uptake may be a better indicator of plant growth responses in these species. Overall, these results suggest that responses to light and water limitation may be independent of each other, allowing species in SDTFs to explore a wide range of combinations of light and water responses to adapt to heterogeneous light and water niches.</p>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotropica","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.13404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs) experience large spatial and temporal variation in water and light availability. The effect of heterogeneity in these limiting resources on species water use, physiology, and growth is still not well understood. We used a shade-house experiment to manipulate light and water availability and examine plant water uptake, leaf-level physiology, and sapling growth in four co-occurring SDTF species belonging to both evergreen and deciduous plant functional types. Water uptake varied dramatically among species with a fivefold difference in maximum whole-plant transpiration (WPT). While species differed in how WPT, leaf physiology, and growth responded to shade, there were no differences among species, or between evergreen and deciduous functional types, in responses to limited water. Importantly, responses to shade were independent of water availability in all four species. Changes in WPT in response to limited light and water were largely congruent with changes in leaf physiology and growth. However, the magnitude of change in leaf physiology was largely driven by light, while changes in WPT and growth were driven by water availability. Thus, whole-plant water uptake may be a better indicator of plant growth responses in these species. Overall, these results suggest that responses to light and water limitation may be independent of each other, allowing species in SDTFs to explore a wide range of combinations of light and water responses to adapt to heterogeneous light and water niches.

Abstract Image

季节性干燥热带森林的树苗对水分限制的反应与光照无关
季节性干燥热带森林(SDTFs)在水和光供应方面存在较大的时空变化。这些有限资源的异质性对物种水分利用、生理和生长的影响尚不清楚。我们利用遮荫室内实验来控制光和水的有效性,并研究了四种共发生的SDTF物种的植物水分吸收、叶片生理和幼苗生长,这些物种属于常绿和落叶植物的功能类型。不同物种间的水分吸收差异显著,最大全株蒸腾(WPT)差异达5倍。虽然不同物种的WPT、叶片生理和生长对遮荫的响应不同,但不同物种之间、常绿和落叶功能类型之间对有限水分的响应没有差异。重要的是,在所有四种物种中,对遮荫的反应与水分供应无关。光照和水分限制下WPT的变化与叶片生理和生长的变化基本一致。然而,叶片生理变化的幅度主要由光驱动,而WPT和生长的变化主要由水分有效性驱动。因此,在这些物种中,全株水分吸收可能是植物生长反应的一个更好的指标。总的来说,这些结果表明,对光和水限制的响应可能是相互独立的,这使得SDTFs中的物种能够探索广泛的光和水响应组合,以适应异质的光和水生态位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biotropica
Biotropica 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Ranked by the ISI index, Biotropica is a highly regarded source of original research on the ecology, conservation and management of all tropical ecosystems, and on the evolution, behavior, and population biology of tropical organisms. Published on behalf of the Association of Tropical Biology and Conservation, the journal''s Special Issues and Special Sections quickly become indispensable references for researchers in the field. Biotropica publishes timely Papers, Reviews, Commentaries, and Insights. Commentaries generate thought-provoking ideas that frequently initiate fruitful debate and discussion, while Reviews provide authoritative and analytical overviews of topics of current conservation or ecological importance. The newly instituted category Insights replaces Short Communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信