Soil test correlation of Olsen-P for corn and soybean in a subtropical humid region

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
N. I. Reussi Calvo, D. Cortez, C. Crespo, N. Wyngaard, J. Terrazas, C. Paz, R. Trujillo, A. Correndo, F. O. Garcia
{"title":"Soil test correlation of Olsen-P for corn and soybean in a subtropical humid region","authors":"N. I. Reussi Calvo,&nbsp;D. Cortez,&nbsp;C. Crespo,&nbsp;N. Wyngaard,&nbsp;J. Terrazas,&nbsp;C. Paz,&nbsp;R. Trujillo,&nbsp;A. Correndo,&nbsp;F. O. Garcia","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate phosphorus (P) fertilizer recommendations for soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] and corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) are crucial for maximizing productivity and economic return while minimizing the environmental impact of fertilizer use. Currently, there are no calibrations for diagnosing P deficiencies in croplands of Bolivia. This study aimed to define and compare the P critical soil test value (CSTV) for corn and soybean using the Olsen method. Twenty fertilization field trials were conducted for corn and 75 for soybean in the Santa Cruz de la Sierra region, including treatments with and without P fertilization. Soil pre-planting (0–20 cm) organic matter, Olsen P, pH, as well as yield were determined. Relative yield (RY) was estimated as the ratio of grain yield between the control and P-fertilized treatments. The CSTV was calculated using the arcsine-logarithm method, with data resampling through bootstrapping. The average yield response to added P was 259 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> (+11.0%) for soybean and 545 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> (+13.7%) for corn. For soybean, CSTVs were determined as 6.1 and 11.0 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> (<i>r</i> = 0.34, <i>p</i> = 0.002) for 90% and 95% of RY, respectively. For corn, the CSTVs were 8.1 and 13.9 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> (<i>r</i> = 0.34, <i>p</i> = 0.14) for 90% and 95% of RY, respectively. The confidence intervals suggest no differences between crops. The Olsen-P is a promising tool for soil fertility recommendations in Bolivia. Yet, the modest goodness of fit obtained suggests the need for further research refining the performance of soil test P diagnosis in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate phosphorus (P) fertilizer recommendations for soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and corn (Zea mays L.) are crucial for maximizing productivity and economic return while minimizing the environmental impact of fertilizer use. Currently, there are no calibrations for diagnosing P deficiencies in croplands of Bolivia. This study aimed to define and compare the P critical soil test value (CSTV) for corn and soybean using the Olsen method. Twenty fertilization field trials were conducted for corn and 75 for soybean in the Santa Cruz de la Sierra region, including treatments with and without P fertilization. Soil pre-planting (0–20 cm) organic matter, Olsen P, pH, as well as yield were determined. Relative yield (RY) was estimated as the ratio of grain yield between the control and P-fertilized treatments. The CSTV was calculated using the arcsine-logarithm method, with data resampling through bootstrapping. The average yield response to added P was 259 kg ha−1 (+11.0%) for soybean and 545 kg ha−1 (+13.7%) for corn. For soybean, CSTVs were determined as 6.1 and 11.0 mg kg−1 (r = 0.34, p = 0.002) for 90% and 95% of RY, respectively. For corn, the CSTVs were 8.1 and 13.9 mg kg−1 (r = 0.34, p = 0.14) for 90% and 95% of RY, respectively. The confidence intervals suggest no differences between crops. The Olsen-P is a promising tool for soil fertility recommendations in Bolivia. Yet, the modest goodness of fit obtained suggests the need for further research refining the performance of soil test P diagnosis in the region.

Abstract Image

亚热带湿润地区玉米和大豆奥尔森-磷土壤试验相关性研究
大豆磷(P)肥的精确推荐[j]稳定。]和玉米(Zea mays L.)对于最大限度地提高生产力和经济回报,同时最大限度地减少肥料使用对环境的影响至关重要。目前,玻利维亚没有用于诊断农田磷缺乏的校准方法。本研究旨在利用Olsen法确定和比较玉米和大豆的磷临界土壤试验值(CSTV)。在Santa Cruz de la Sierra地区进行了20个玉米和75个大豆施肥大田试验,包括施磷肥和不施磷肥处理。测定种植前0 ~ 20 cm土壤有机质、奥尔森磷、pH值及产量。相对产量(RY)为对照处理与施磷处理籽粒产量之比。CSTV的计算采用反正弦对数法,通过自举法对数据进行重采样。大豆和玉米对添加磷的平均产量响应分别为259 kg ha - 1(+11.0%)和545 kg ha - 1(+13.7%)。对于大豆,在90%和95%的RY条件下,CSTVs分别为6.1和11.0 mg kg - 1 (r = 0.34, p = 0.002)。玉米的CSTVs在90%和95%的氮肥处理下分别为8.1和13.9 mg kg - 1 (r = 0.34, p = 0.14)。置信区间表明不同作物之间没有差异。在玻利维亚,Olsen-P是一种很有前途的土壤肥力建议工具。然而,获得的适度拟合优度表明需要进一步研究,以改进该地区土壤试验P诊断的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信