Comparison between measurements of the circumpapillary nerve fiber layer thickness and the thickness of the waist of the nerve fiber layer in the optic nerve head

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jonatan Holm, Konstancija Kisonaite, Zhaohua Yu, Chunliang Wang, Qiran Cao, Per Soderberg
{"title":"Comparison between measurements of the circumpapillary nerve fiber layer thickness and the thickness of the waist of the nerve fiber layer in the optic nerve head","authors":"Jonatan Holm,&nbsp;Konstancija Kisonaite,&nbsp;Zhaohua Yu,&nbsp;Chunliang Wang,&nbsp;Qiran Cao,&nbsp;Per Soderberg","doi":"10.1111/aos.17096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <p><b>Aims/Purpose:</b> To compare measurements of circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness (cpRNFLT) and Pigment epithelium central limit Inner limit of the retina Minimal Distance (PIMD), respectively, between healthy and glaucoma eyes with regard to angular distribution of the measurements in the frontal plane and the variation coefficients for measurements of cpRNFLT-2π and PIMD-2π.</p>\n \n <p><b>Methods:</b> 17 eyes without ocular pathology and 7 with glaucoma, each from a different subject, were included. In each eye, the ONH was captured in 3 iterated volumes at one occasion with the OCT-Triton (Topcon, Japan). In each volume, the nerve fiber layer thickness was resolved in 12 frontal plane clock hrs as cpRNFLT with the Topcon software, and as PIMD with an automatic custom-made software. Finally, the 12 clock hrs were averaged and the inter-volume errors were determined with ANOVA for comparison of variation coefficients (CV:s) between cpRNFLT-2π and PIMD-2π.</p>\n \n <p><b>Results:</b> PIMD-2π was approximately 3 times higher than cpRNFLT-2π in the healthy eyes and 2.5 times higher in the glaucoma eyes. In both groups, PIMD peaked superiorly and inferiorly, slightly shifted nasally, and cpRNFLT peaked superiorly and inferiorly, slightly shifted temporally. The CV for iterated measurements at the same occasion was slightly higher for PIMD-2π than for cpRNFLT-2π in the healthy eyes, and of the same order for PIMD-2π and cpRNFLT-2π in the glaucoma eyes.</p>\n \n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> PIMD-2π and cpRNFLT-2π were lower in glaucoma- than in healthy eyes, probably due to less ganglion cell axons. PIMD-2π was generally 2.5-3 times higher than cpRNFLT-2π. The CV:s were on the order of 1.5-2.5 x10<sup>-2</sup> for both healthy- and glaucoma eyes and both quantities measured. Thus, averages of 3 volumes at each occasion is sufficient for comparison of measurements among occasions within subjects.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":"103 S284","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.17096","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.17096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/Purpose: To compare measurements of circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness (cpRNFLT) and Pigment epithelium central limit Inner limit of the retina Minimal Distance (PIMD), respectively, between healthy and glaucoma eyes with regard to angular distribution of the measurements in the frontal plane and the variation coefficients for measurements of cpRNFLT-2π and PIMD-2π.

Methods: 17 eyes without ocular pathology and 7 with glaucoma, each from a different subject, were included. In each eye, the ONH was captured in 3 iterated volumes at one occasion with the OCT-Triton (Topcon, Japan). In each volume, the nerve fiber layer thickness was resolved in 12 frontal plane clock hrs as cpRNFLT with the Topcon software, and as PIMD with an automatic custom-made software. Finally, the 12 clock hrs were averaged and the inter-volume errors were determined with ANOVA for comparison of variation coefficients (CV:s) between cpRNFLT-2π and PIMD-2π.

Results: PIMD-2π was approximately 3 times higher than cpRNFLT-2π in the healthy eyes and 2.5 times higher in the glaucoma eyes. In both groups, PIMD peaked superiorly and inferiorly, slightly shifted nasally, and cpRNFLT peaked superiorly and inferiorly, slightly shifted temporally. The CV for iterated measurements at the same occasion was slightly higher for PIMD-2π than for cpRNFLT-2π in the healthy eyes, and of the same order for PIMD-2π and cpRNFLT-2π in the glaucoma eyes.

Conclusions: PIMD-2π and cpRNFLT-2π were lower in glaucoma- than in healthy eyes, probably due to less ganglion cell axons. PIMD-2π was generally 2.5-3 times higher than cpRNFLT-2π. The CV:s were on the order of 1.5-2.5 x10-2 for both healthy- and glaucoma eyes and both quantities measured. Thus, averages of 3 volumes at each occasion is sufficient for comparison of measurements among occasions within subjects.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信