Expression-based machine learning models for predicting plant tissue identity

IF 2.7 3区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Sourabh Palande, Jeremy Arsenault, Patricia Basurto-Lozada, Andrew Bleich, Brianna N. I. Brown, Sophia F. Buysse, Noelle A. Connors, Sikta Das Adhikari, Kara C. Dobson, Francisco Xavier Guerra-Castillo, Maria F. Guerrero-Carrillo, Sophia Harlow, Héctor Herrera-Orozco, Asia T. Hightower, Paulo Izquierdo, MacKenzie Jacobs, Nicholas A. Johnson, Wendy Leuenberger, Alessandro Lopez-Hernandez, Alicia Luckie-Duque, Camila Martínez-Avila, Eddy J. Mendoza-Galindo, David Cruz Plancarte, Jenny M. Schuster, Harry Shomer, Sidney C. Sitar, Anne K. Steensma, Joanne Elise Thomson, Damián Villaseñor-Amador, Robin Waterman, Brandon M. Webster, Madison Whyte, Sofía Zorilla-Azcué, Beronda L. Montgomery, Aman Y. Husbands, Arjun Krishnan, Sarah Percival, Elizabeth Munch, Robert VanBuren, Daniel H. Chitwood, Alejandra Rougon-Cardoso
{"title":"Expression-based machine learning models for predicting plant tissue identity","authors":"Sourabh Palande,&nbsp;Jeremy Arsenault,&nbsp;Patricia Basurto-Lozada,&nbsp;Andrew Bleich,&nbsp;Brianna N. I. Brown,&nbsp;Sophia F. Buysse,&nbsp;Noelle A. Connors,&nbsp;Sikta Das Adhikari,&nbsp;Kara C. Dobson,&nbsp;Francisco Xavier Guerra-Castillo,&nbsp;Maria F. Guerrero-Carrillo,&nbsp;Sophia Harlow,&nbsp;Héctor Herrera-Orozco,&nbsp;Asia T. Hightower,&nbsp;Paulo Izquierdo,&nbsp;MacKenzie Jacobs,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Johnson,&nbsp;Wendy Leuenberger,&nbsp;Alessandro Lopez-Hernandez,&nbsp;Alicia Luckie-Duque,&nbsp;Camila Martínez-Avila,&nbsp;Eddy J. Mendoza-Galindo,&nbsp;David Cruz Plancarte,&nbsp;Jenny M. Schuster,&nbsp;Harry Shomer,&nbsp;Sidney C. Sitar,&nbsp;Anne K. Steensma,&nbsp;Joanne Elise Thomson,&nbsp;Damián Villaseñor-Amador,&nbsp;Robin Waterman,&nbsp;Brandon M. Webster,&nbsp;Madison Whyte,&nbsp;Sofía Zorilla-Azcué,&nbsp;Beronda L. Montgomery,&nbsp;Aman Y. Husbands,&nbsp;Arjun Krishnan,&nbsp;Sarah Percival,&nbsp;Elizabeth Munch,&nbsp;Robert VanBuren,&nbsp;Daniel H. Chitwood,&nbsp;Alejandra Rougon-Cardoso","doi":"10.1002/aps3.11621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>The selection of <i>Arabidopsis</i> as a model organism played a pivotal role in advancing genomic science. The competing frameworks to select an agricultural- or ecological-based model species were rejected, in favor of building knowledge in a species that would facilitate genome-enabled research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Here, we examine the ability of models based on <i>Arabidopsis</i> gene expression data to predict tissue identity in other flowering plants. Comparing different machine learning algorithms, models trained and tested on <i>Arabidopsis</i> data achieved near perfect precision and recall values, whereas when tissue identity is predicted across the flowering plants using models trained on <i>Arabidopsis</i> data, precision values range from 0.69 to 0.74 and recall from 0.54 to 0.64.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The identity of belowground tissue can be predicted more accurately than other tissue types, and the ability to predict tissue identity is not correlated with phylogenetic distance from <i>Arabidopsis</i>. <i>k</i>-nearest neighbors is the most successful algorithm, suggesting that gene expression signatures, rather than marker genes, are more valuable to create models for tissue and cell type prediction in plants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Our data-driven results highlight that the assertion that knowledge from <i>Arabidopsis</i> is translatable to other plants is not always true. Considering the current landscape of abundant sequencing data, we should reevaluate the scientific emphasis on <i>Arabidopsis</i> and prioritize plant diversity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8022,"journal":{"name":"Applications in Plant Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aps3.11621","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applications in Plant Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aps3.11621","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise

The selection of Arabidopsis as a model organism played a pivotal role in advancing genomic science. The competing frameworks to select an agricultural- or ecological-based model species were rejected, in favor of building knowledge in a species that would facilitate genome-enabled research.

Methods

Here, we examine the ability of models based on Arabidopsis gene expression data to predict tissue identity in other flowering plants. Comparing different machine learning algorithms, models trained and tested on Arabidopsis data achieved near perfect precision and recall values, whereas when tissue identity is predicted across the flowering plants using models trained on Arabidopsis data, precision values range from 0.69 to 0.74 and recall from 0.54 to 0.64.

Results

The identity of belowground tissue can be predicted more accurately than other tissue types, and the ability to predict tissue identity is not correlated with phylogenetic distance from Arabidopsis. k-nearest neighbors is the most successful algorithm, suggesting that gene expression signatures, rather than marker genes, are more valuable to create models for tissue and cell type prediction in plants.

Discussion

Our data-driven results highlight that the assertion that knowledge from Arabidopsis is translatable to other plants is not always true. Considering the current landscape of abundant sequencing data, we should reevaluate the scientific emphasis on Arabidopsis and prioritize plant diversity.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Applications in Plant Sciences (APPS) is a monthly, peer-reviewed, open access journal promoting the rapid dissemination of newly developed, innovative tools and protocols in all areas of the plant sciences, including genetics, structure, function, development, evolution, systematics, and ecology. Given the rapid progress today in technology and its application in the plant sciences, the goal of APPS is to foster communication within the plant science community to advance scientific research. APPS is a publication of the Botanical Society of America, originating in 2009 as the American Journal of Botany''s online-only section, AJB Primer Notes & Protocols in the Plant Sciences. APPS publishes the following types of articles: (1) Protocol Notes describe new methods and technological advancements; (2) Genomic Resources Articles characterize the development and demonstrate the usefulness of newly developed genomic resources, including transcriptomes; (3) Software Notes detail new software applications; (4) Application Articles illustrate the application of a new protocol, method, or software application within the context of a larger study; (5) Review Articles evaluate available techniques, methods, or protocols; (6) Primer Notes report novel genetic markers with evidence of wide applicability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信