Attitudes toward mandatory vaccination and the COVID certificate as a function of vaccination status and risk perception: A vignette-based study

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Marie Brisbois, Mathias Schmitz, Maarten Vansteenkiste, Vincent Yzerbyt, Pascaline Van Oost, Sofie Morbée, Joachim Waterschoot, Olivier Luminet, Omer Van den Bergh, Eveline Raemdonck, Olivier Klein
{"title":"Attitudes toward mandatory vaccination and the COVID certificate as a function of vaccination status and risk perception: A vignette-based study","authors":"Marie Brisbois,&nbsp;Mathias Schmitz,&nbsp;Maarten Vansteenkiste,&nbsp;Vincent Yzerbyt,&nbsp;Pascaline Van Oost,&nbsp;Sofie Morbée,&nbsp;Joachim Waterschoot,&nbsp;Olivier Luminet,&nbsp;Omer Van den Bergh,&nbsp;Eveline Raemdonck,&nbsp;Olivier Klein","doi":"10.1111/asap.12435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In January 2022, several vaccination policies were debated to address the Omicron outbreak in Belgium. Considering variability in risk perception and vaccine uptake, this study aimed to understand differences in support and expectations for four scenarios, ranging from relaxed to restrictive vaccination policies, to inform policymakers. Using an online survey, 12,670 participants (46% female; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 45.9, SD = 13.38) reported their risk perception, number of vaccination doses (0/1, 2, 3 doses) as well as their support and several anticipated psychological outcomes for each scenario. Mixed model ANCOVA showed a pattern of preferential support for the relaxed scenario and more positive anticipated outcomes (general well-being and government appraisals) compared to the restrictive policies, that were treated equivalently. An exception to this pattern was found when people were vaccinated with three doses and perceived high risk. Taken separately, risk perception and vaccination status were not sufficient to drive positive attitudes toward restrictive policies; only their interaction had an effect. Limitations include the self-selected sample and the vignette methodology. The conjunct role of risk perception and vaccination status should be considered when discussing the introduction of restrictive vaccination policies. These findings inform vaccination strategies management during pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.12435","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In January 2022, several vaccination policies were debated to address the Omicron outbreak in Belgium. Considering variability in risk perception and vaccine uptake, this study aimed to understand differences in support and expectations for four scenarios, ranging from relaxed to restrictive vaccination policies, to inform policymakers. Using an online survey, 12,670 participants (46% female; Mage = 45.9, SD = 13.38) reported their risk perception, number of vaccination doses (0/1, 2, 3 doses) as well as their support and several anticipated psychological outcomes for each scenario. Mixed model ANCOVA showed a pattern of preferential support for the relaxed scenario and more positive anticipated outcomes (general well-being and government appraisals) compared to the restrictive policies, that were treated equivalently. An exception to this pattern was found when people were vaccinated with three doses and perceived high risk. Taken separately, risk perception and vaccination status were not sufficient to drive positive attitudes toward restrictive policies; only their interaction had an effect. Limitations include the self-selected sample and the vignette methodology. The conjunct role of risk perception and vaccination status should be considered when discussing the introduction of restrictive vaccination policies. These findings inform vaccination strategies management during pandemics.

对强制性疫苗接种和COVID证书的态度与疫苗接种状况和风险认知的关系:一项基于小样本的研究
2022年1月,为应对比利时欧米克隆病毒的爆发,对若干疫苗接种政策进行了辩论。考虑到风险认知和疫苗摄取的可变性,本研究旨在了解对从宽松到限制性疫苗接种政策的四种情况的支持和期望的差异,以便为决策者提供信息。通过一项在线调查,12670名参与者(46%为女性;Mage = 45.9, SD = 13.38)报告了他们的风险认知、疫苗接种剂量(0/1、2、3剂量)以及他们对每种情况的支持和几种预期心理结果。与同等对待的限制性政策相比,混合模型ANCOVA显示了对宽松情景的优先支持模式和更积极的预期结果(总体福祉和政府评估)。这种模式的一个例外是,当人们接种三剂疫苗并认为风险很高时。单独来看,风险认知和疫苗接种状况不足以推动对限制性政策的积极态度;只有他们的相互作用才有效果。局限性包括自我选择的样本和小插曲方法。在讨论引入限制性疫苗接种政策时,应考虑风险认知和疫苗接种状况的共同作用。这些发现为大流行期间的疫苗接种战略管理提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信