Efficacy of Chitosan-Cloisites—Nanocomposite as Sustainable Coatings on Storage Stability of Fresh Eggs

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Orhan Atakan, Cengiz Caner, Muhammed Yüceer
{"title":"Efficacy of Chitosan-Cloisites—Nanocomposite as Sustainable Coatings on Storage Stability of Fresh Eggs","authors":"Orhan Atakan,&nbsp;Cengiz Caner,&nbsp;Muhammed Yüceer","doi":"10.1111/jfpe.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Fresh eggs can quickly lose their high quality if the necessary care is not taken during storage. Biocoating the fresh eggs may be a valuable option. The current study focused on developing sustainable chitosan biocoatings by adding different Cloisite clays (Cloisite 15A, 20A, and 30B) into chitosan biocoatings to seek enhancement effects on the fresh eggshell storability. The variables measured were weight loss (WL), Haugh unit (HU), yolk index, pH measurements, soluble solids, relative whipping capacity and foam stability, color analysis, lipid oxidation, viscosity, and eggshell breaking strength. The coatings increased the eggshell's storability by sealing its pores, which decreased breakage and minimized mass transfer. As a result, the lower WL occurred in the Cloisite-coated groups. The WL, which was 6.63% in the control group, was 3.63% in the group coated with chitosan-Cloisite15A combination at week 4. The HU of samples with chitosan-Cloisite15A and chitosan-Cloisite20A (60.14) had the highest HU, significantly. Chitosan-Cloisite 30B (58.78), pure chitosan (53.85), while the control (45.60) was the lowest HU. The TBARS values were measured as follows: control 1.01; chitosan 0.61, chitosan-Cloisite15A 0.39, chitosan-Cloisite20A 0.42, and chitosan-Cloisite30B 0.47 mg of malondialdehyde/kg. Cloisite15A were found to be the most effective for improving storage stability and Cloisite30 B for enhancing breaking strength. Biocoatings with Cloisite (15A, 20B, and 30B) could enhance qualities for at least 2 weeks longer.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpe.70014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fresh eggs can quickly lose their high quality if the necessary care is not taken during storage. Biocoating the fresh eggs may be a valuable option. The current study focused on developing sustainable chitosan biocoatings by adding different Cloisite clays (Cloisite 15A, 20A, and 30B) into chitosan biocoatings to seek enhancement effects on the fresh eggshell storability. The variables measured were weight loss (WL), Haugh unit (HU), yolk index, pH measurements, soluble solids, relative whipping capacity and foam stability, color analysis, lipid oxidation, viscosity, and eggshell breaking strength. The coatings increased the eggshell's storability by sealing its pores, which decreased breakage and minimized mass transfer. As a result, the lower WL occurred in the Cloisite-coated groups. The WL, which was 6.63% in the control group, was 3.63% in the group coated with chitosan-Cloisite15A combination at week 4. The HU of samples with chitosan-Cloisite15A and chitosan-Cloisite20A (60.14) had the highest HU, significantly. Chitosan-Cloisite 30B (58.78), pure chitosan (53.85), while the control (45.60) was the lowest HU. The TBARS values were measured as follows: control 1.01; chitosan 0.61, chitosan-Cloisite15A 0.39, chitosan-Cloisite20A 0.42, and chitosan-Cloisite30B 0.47 mg of malondialdehyde/kg. Cloisite15A were found to be the most effective for improving storage stability and Cloisite30 B for enhancing breaking strength. Biocoatings with Cloisite (15A, 20B, and 30B) could enhance qualities for at least 2 weeks longer.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Journal of Food Process Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
259
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: This international research journal focuses on the engineering aspects of post-production handling, storage, processing, packaging, and distribution of food. Read by researchers, food and chemical engineers, and industry experts, this is the only international journal specifically devoted to the engineering aspects of food processing. Co-Editors M. Elena Castell-Perez and Rosana Moreira, both of Texas A&M University, welcome papers covering the best original research on applications of engineering principles and concepts to food and food processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信