Comparison of soil Mehlich-3 phosphorus quantified by colorimetry and inductively coupled plasma: A case study for temperate agroecosystems

Noura Ziadi, Bernard Gagnon, Jean Lafond, Sylvie Coté, Marie Bipfubusa
{"title":"Comparison of soil Mehlich-3 phosphorus quantified by colorimetry and inductively coupled plasma: A case study for temperate agroecosystems","authors":"Noura Ziadi,&nbsp;Bernard Gagnon,&nbsp;Jean Lafond,&nbsp;Sylvie Coté,&nbsp;Marie Bipfubusa","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Phosphorus (P) is one of the most limiting essential nutrients for agricultural production and its availability to crops is assessed by various methods. Mehlich-3, however, remains the most used method worldwide. For decades, the colorimetric method by blue ascorbic acid-molybdate reaction has been used to determine soil P concentration following Mehlich-3 extraction. Since early 1990s, the use of automated methods to quantify soil nutrients including P has expanded rapidly, and the inductively coupled plasma (ICP) emission spectroscopy is becoming one of the most popular instruments in routine soil testing. The main objective of this study was to compare ICP (where M3P is Mehlich-3 P, M3P-ICP) with colorimetric (M3P-Col) methods to estimate soil P using data from soil samples (3020) collected between 2005 and 2021 from 16 experiments conducted under different agroecosystems in Canada and Europe. Five case studies were assessed: (1) laboratory incubation, (2) native lowbush blueberry, (3) soil depth, (4) soil tillage, and (5) annual field crops versus perennial forage. In each study, a regression equation was established between soil M3P-ICP and M3P-Col. Results indicated that the two methods were strongly related in all studies (0.82 &lt; <i>r<sup>2</sup></i> &lt; 0.99; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), where soil P measured by ICP (2.1–352 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>) was higher than that measured by colorimetry (0.6–339 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>) except for the incubation study. Most important P differences were observed with forage and blueberry. Further analysis revealed that large differences between M3P-ICP and M3P-Col occurred primarily due to soil total C content. Soil pH, clay and Fe content, and previous crops also affected the relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is one of the most limiting essential nutrients for agricultural production and its availability to crops is assessed by various methods. Mehlich-3, however, remains the most used method worldwide. For decades, the colorimetric method by blue ascorbic acid-molybdate reaction has been used to determine soil P concentration following Mehlich-3 extraction. Since early 1990s, the use of automated methods to quantify soil nutrients including P has expanded rapidly, and the inductively coupled plasma (ICP) emission spectroscopy is becoming one of the most popular instruments in routine soil testing. The main objective of this study was to compare ICP (where M3P is Mehlich-3 P, M3P-ICP) with colorimetric (M3P-Col) methods to estimate soil P using data from soil samples (3020) collected between 2005 and 2021 from 16 experiments conducted under different agroecosystems in Canada and Europe. Five case studies were assessed: (1) laboratory incubation, (2) native lowbush blueberry, (3) soil depth, (4) soil tillage, and (5) annual field crops versus perennial forage. In each study, a regression equation was established between soil M3P-ICP and M3P-Col. Results indicated that the two methods were strongly related in all studies (0.82 < r2 < 0.99; p < 0.001), where soil P measured by ICP (2.1–352 mg kg−1) was higher than that measured by colorimetry (0.6–339 mg kg−1) except for the incubation study. Most important P differences were observed with forage and blueberry. Further analysis revealed that large differences between M3P-ICP and M3P-Col occurred primarily due to soil total C content. Soil pH, clay and Fe content, and previous crops also affected the relationship.

比色法和电感耦合等离子体法测定土壤Mehlich-3磷的比较:以温带农业生态系统为例
磷(P)是农业生产中最受限制的必需营养素之一,其对作物的有效性通过各种方法进行评估。然而,Mehlich-3仍然是世界上最常用的方法。几十年来,蓝色抗坏血酸-钼酸盐反应比色法一直被用来测定Mehlich-3萃取后的土壤P浓度。自20世纪90年代初以来,包括磷在内的土壤养分的自动化定量方法的应用迅速扩大,电感耦合等离子体(ICP)发射光谱法正在成为常规土壤检测中最受欢迎的仪器之一。本研究的主要目的是比较ICP(其中M3P是mehlich - 3p, M3P-ICP)和比色法(M3P- col)方法,利用2005年至2021年间在加拿大和欧洲不同农业生态系统下进行的16次实验中收集的土壤样品(3020)数据来估计土壤P。评估了五个案例研究:(1)实验室孵化,(2)本地矮丛蓝莓,(3)土壤深度,(4)土壤耕作,(5)一年生大田作物与多年生牧草。在每项研究中,都建立了土壤M3P-ICP与M3P-Col之间的回归方程。结果表明,两种方法在所有研究中均呈强相关(0.82 <;r2 & lt;0.99;p & lt;0.001),其中ICP测量的土壤P (2.1-352 mg kg - 1)高于比色法测量的(0.6-339 mg kg - 1),但孵育研究除外。饲粮和蓝莓对磷的影响最为显著。进一步分析表明,M3P-ICP与M3P-Col之间的巨大差异主要是由土壤总碳含量引起的。土壤pH值、粘粒和铁含量以及前茬作物也会影响这一关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信